Like a waterfall display directly underneath and keyed by frequency to the
panadapter display. That would be cool! ...and still 2d for the display.
Maybe that wouldn't be too difficult since both displays already exist.
Kent/KA5MIR
On Friday 04 May 2007 08:05:24 pm Tim Ellison wrote
with tuner guy care about the radio w/o tuner at all?
It would seem that to make the rig effective that the boys would just
include it in the OVERALL PRICE!!!
Flex Radio - Please continue to give me options so I CAN DECIDE what the
most effective rig is for me.
Thank you,
Jeff/KA5MIR
volunteers, who has better
software? I use other rigs, but always come back to the Panadapter/Spectrum
Display in PowerSDR. It is my visual connection into the previously only
audible radio spectrum and the PowerSDR panadapter is great. Is that too
dramatic? Just my opinion...
73',
Kent/KA5MIR
It would seem that a separate cheap built-in receiver like a broadcast band
rcvr just for the noise blanker input could work and not affect the current
Flex receiver.
I take it from the lack of response to my post that this must not be a
problem for many people, though.
Thanks Maarten for
Hello Bob,
GREAT! I'm not familiar with the terms noise subtraction but possibly it
is related to a phase reversal and a balancing out type of process?
In any case, GREAT! Have I said that already? After going through power
co negotiations and putting up with impulse noises for YEARS,
On Thursday 08 March 2007 11:16:34 am Bob Maser wrote:
Why would anyone say something stupid like dump Microsoft? Without
Microsoft, we'd still be using CPM.
Pot, meet Kettle...
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
that just do
email use the default os, but I would think that the majority of SDR users
would be in a more computer literate group. A group that could appreciate
the advantages of not being tied to a single os vendor with manipulative
tendencies.
Jeff/KA5MIR
think their success indicates that it was a good
business decision.
Jeff/KA5MIR
On Wednesday 03 January 2007 10:38, Bob McGwier wrote:
User space drivers, behind Vista layers and layers of bulk and
protection of digital media rights, is possible. It is just awful so
why would we do it? I
While competition
Ridicule;
FUD;
Embrace and Extend;
Inject IP;
Litigate;
Eliminate;
I would guess we are at the start of the embrace and extend clause.
...
I am very wary of using Mono for a major development until ALL of the
implications of the MS/Novell situation fall out.
NB3
(the post filter blanker) and leave NB1 and NB2 off. ...or whatever
combination produced the best results for that noise and signal.
Thanks for considering,
Jeff/KA5MIR
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz
. It is Open Source
and Free and as Joe said, it prints pdf's directly.
Once information gets into a proprietary format, it can be difficult to pry
it loose from dependency on a particular vendors software.
Jeff/KA5MIR
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 12:53, Joe - AB1DO wrote:
Hi,
I am hoping to use
version. The code is done. His implementation
WORKS WELL! Why try to reinvent what Jeff has so graciously offered to us
for free?
Thanks to the code maintainers for considering this request.
Jeff/KA5MIR
On Sunday 09 July 2006 14:35, Ken N9VV wrote:
For those of you who may have missed
with the newly downloaded exe showing 701.
I am running Subversion from the command line without Tortoise. Have not had
any problems previously.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Jeff/KA5MIR
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex
Thanks for the replies, both on and off list.
Jeff/KA5MIR
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz
The */bin/Release sub-directory seems to be gone now...
Maybe whoever is changing it will let us common folk know what's going on and
where to look for the binaries when it's done. :)
Jeff/KA5MIR
On Thursday 26 October 2006 22:06, Tim Ellison wrote:
I believe, you have to actually pick
Would someone who knows mind sharing what files are placed where and what is
added to the registry? I mean other than in the release directory.
Thanks,
Jeff/KA5MIR
On Saturday 21 October 2006 11:28, Gerald Capodieci wrote:
Just a note on running from an 'Install' vs running from an unzipped
That might be a handy tool to have. I'll remember it.
Thanks Ken,
Jeff/KA5MIR
On Saturday 21 October 2006 15:34, Ken - N9VV wrote:
Hi Jeff, I don't know if this might help you. I use ConfigSafe and it
shows me every thing that is changed in the PC including every registry
entry. I haven't
Ah, that's exactly what I was curious about!
Thanks Eric,
Jeff/KA5MIR
On Saturday 21 October 2006 19:25, FlexRadio - Eric wrote:
This file (and the associated registry entry mentioned above)
are actually what will keep an SVN version from working if they
are not present
To expound a little more... The fast attack and lockup is a GOOD thing. The
fast release is a BAD thing.
A separate thought is if the lock frequency could be weighted to favor a
signal closer to the vfo frequency vs one farther away that may be stronger.
Jeff/KA5MIR
No! No! No! Please don't reach into my computer and permanently and
irreparably tear out the digital meter. I don't want a ragged hole in the
console with little virtual wires hanging out!
Sorry... couldn't resist.
Sincerely - Thanks for the OPTION.
Jeff/KA5MIR
On Tuesday 10 October 2006
That's great! That should attract a lot more volunteer code
contributor/maintainers.
On Tuesday 10 October 2006 11:42, Eric Wachsmann wrote:
We ARE NOT planning on using the same tools for the future versions of the
software. Rather, we will use FREE TOOLS.
for the spurs
so as not to stop on them during scanning. Probably have to keep the spur
frequencies in a database. There could be hundreds of them. Maybe someone
will take on that challenge at some point. For now, I'm very glad that the
code is open and the possibility exists.
Jeff/KA5MIR
time elsewhere. Everything
has priorities. I don't know. Just another possibility.
Jeff/KA5MIR
On Saturday 30 September 2006 07:32, Stig Rasmussen wrote:
Can someone tell me how to start scanning.
In the 1.6.2 there is a Scanner-button on the front.(Greyed out, no
function)
In 1.6.3 SVN
Mel,
That is very interesting. Why did you choose a standalone box? Is there
not a good software solution available for the SDR or is the ARD just easier
to implement?
Thank you,
Jeff/KA5MIR
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 14:48, Mel Whitten wrote:
I have completed testing with the new
. Maybe with VAC.
Thanks very much Mel for your reply and the information you have
published. I'll be checking for your update to the Flex Expert Setups
section.
73'
Jeff/KA5MIR
On Wednesday 13 September 2006 17:52, you wrote:
Jeff,
I have been following the work of G4GUO who did
version, but don't want to miss
out on any bugfixes or future enhancements.
A big Thanks! to everyone working on this software.
Jeff/KA5MIR
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex
.
As for overdrive protection, the SDR has great potential here by sampling
audio level BEFORE rf generation instead of detecting it after the fact.
This could eliminate the overshoot problem entirely.
I've entered a feature request for a Peak Audio Limiter on the wish list. :)
73'
Jeff/KA5MIR
as
there are people who want to maintain them. The more the merrier.
Jeff/KA5MIR
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex
That's interesting. I have a Dell P4 also.
Thanks Eric Dennis,
Jeff/KA5MIR
I used to have this happen to me on a Dell machine I used
...
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
I see this rather often when I first start up with my Dell P4
...
Dennis NT0V
29 matches
Mail list logo
