I didn't think it was on my Win7 x64.
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Tim Ellison
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 7:14 AM
To: jmb...@teaser.fr
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] General
Is there a version that has the CAT command fixed AND supports x64? It seems
that the ones that I've tried don't like the x64.
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Tim Ellison
Sent: Thursday, June 04, 2009 7:19
for details.
-Original Message-
From: Bob McGwier [mailto:rwmcgw...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 02, 2009 6:36 PM
To: Woodrick, Ed
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] vhf/uhf digital modes and repeater operation
I believe that we should follow the route that Ed
.
Just one ham's opinion.
Cheers,
Bill (kd5tfd)
At 07:55 PM 6/1/2009, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
But it doesn't preclude the use of D-STAR. (and there is D-STAR data
without voice)
There's a number of efforts where the AMBE chip (a lot of
state-of-art technology crammed into a little chip) is being
Because if you turn it on, you get two receivers within the current segment
being scanned. So you can listen on frequency as well as up 10
You can't listen on two bands without the second receiver, or 200 kHz apart,
but you can when they are closer to each other.
Ed WA4YIH
-Original
Correction - D-STAR is NOT Proprietary. It is an open standard developed by the
JARL.
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
[mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of Tim Ellison
Sent: Monday, June 01, 2009 11:08 AM
To: Jim Madden;
, June 01, 2009 8:09 PM
To: Woodrick, Ed; Jim Madden; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] vhf/uhf digital modes and repeater operation
OK, so proprietary was the wrong description. The original specification is in
the public domain, developed by JARL as you noted. It specifies the AMBE
I think that the greatest compatibility would be Vista or Windows 7 32bit.
XP on a quad core would be like, Guttenberg on a computer. It just isn't
optimized for quad-core implementations
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
I'll definitely agree that there has been a lot of hard work done. But there's
some very basics to the equation.
Parallel ports were pretty much out of use when the Flex 1000 was shipped.
Apple, the prime pusher of the Firewire port has now started to drop support
for Firewire just as the Flex
Brian,
My guess is that there probably has been no significant testing of the voltage
levels for the 3000. I suspect that the specified voltages come from the many
parts that are used in the radio. As such, your mileage may vary on a per radio
basis as to what the actual levels may be.
I
If I'm not mistaken, that's a Hyperthreaded processor, not a dual-core.
I'd probably recommend getting a new machine for anything else that you do and
then wipe this one clean and reload it with a fresh OS for your Flex computer.
I'd stay away from ANYTHING else on the machine such as
I wouldn't suggest even thinking about running PowerSDR in a virtualized
server. Aside from the just getting the Firewire to work, virtualization and
real-time operation do not fit in the same sentence.
Ed WA4YIH
-Original Message-
From: flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz
24, 2009 10:19 AM
To: Woodrick, Ed; FlexRadio List
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Choice of PCs
Woodrick, Ed wrote:
Now, if you had a regular radio, would you install a toaster in it? What
about using it as a remote control. Hopefully your answer is no. So why do
you make your SDR controller a Word
Wow, check the forum today and there's been a lot of messages, many about the
choice of computer.
Now, I'm not a Flex expert, but I do know computers, and I feel that I can
definitely stand behind the following statements.
It will be next to impossible to guarantee that a computer is going to
14 matches
Mail list logo
