Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting

2009-12-11 Thread George Steube
: Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting I've been running LOGic with hardware radios for a l-o-n-g time, pretty much trouble-free and frankly can't complain about the product or support. OK, so some have reported troubles interfacing with FLEX, others not. Those of you who have switched from

Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting

2009-12-11 Thread NU8Z
-boun...@flex-radio.biz] On Behalf Of George Steube Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 7:28 AM To: K0DAN; dan edwards Cc: flex list Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting Dan, The transfer was easy, the software is free, there is a ton of QSLing options that work. Just down load

Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting

2009-12-11 Thread K0DAN
edwards' w...@att.net Cc: 'flex list' flexradio@flex-radio.biz Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 8:59 AM Subject: RE: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting I was also a long time user of Logic. Started back with Logic 1 or 2 (can't remember). I think Logic is an excellent logging program

Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting

2009-12-11 Thread Neal Campbell
@flex-radio.biz Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 8:59 AM Subject: RE: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting I was also a long time user of Logic. Started back with Logic 1 or 2 (can't remember). I think Logic is an excellent logging program. If it were not for the issues ( I had

Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting

2009-12-11 Thread Tim Ellison
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting Excuse my shameless plug but as the owner of DXBase, I can guarantee you that DXBase will be 100% compatible with the expanded CAT cormmand set with the next major release which will be sometime next year. Neal Campbell Abroham Neal

Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting

2009-12-11 Thread N4PY2
...@comcast.net Cc: flex list flexradio@flex-radio.biz Sent: Friday, December 11, 2009 12:32 PM Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting If only more developers would take the initiative to do the same. Thanks a lot, Neal! -Tim -Original Message- From: flexradio-boun...@flex

Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting

2009-12-11 Thread Rick Tarbert
to their SDR radios? 73 dan k0dan - Original Message - From: Rudy Bakalov r_baka...@yahoo.com To: FlexRadio reflector flexradio@flex-radio.biz; Brian Lloyd brian-wb6...@lloyd.com Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 12:17 PM Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting Fair enough

[Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting

2009-12-10 Thread Brian Lloyd
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Rudy Bakalov r_baka...@yahoo.com wrote: It appears that the logger can in fact re-program the antenna selection on the fly using the set of available CAT commands.  But this is extremely inefficient as the logger will have to send all the CAT commands just to

Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting

2009-12-10 Thread Rudy Bakalov
-wb6...@lloyd.com wrote: From: Brian Lloyd brian-wb6...@lloyd.com Subject: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting To: FlexRadio reflector flexradio@flex-radio.biz Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 1:00 PM On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Rudy Bakalov r_baka...@yahoo.com wrote: It appears

Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting

2009-12-10 Thread Brian Lloyd
On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Rudy Bakalov r_baka...@yahoo.com wrote: Fair enough.  The issue with the logger is the ease of configuration.  Many hams are intimidated by messing with CAT commands. I don't expect most hams to mess with the CAT commands. I do expect that they are the way

Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting

2009-12-10 Thread K0DAN
, 2009 12:17 PM Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting Fair enough. The issue with the logger is the ease of configuration. Many hams are intimidated by messing with CAT commands. Also, there is a much higher risk of an error compared to a visual interface that clearly defines

Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting

2009-12-10 Thread Rudy Bakalov
. Rudy N2WQ --- On Thu, 12/10/09, Brian Lloyd brian-wb6...@lloyd.com wrote: From: Brian Lloyd brian-wb6...@lloyd.com Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting To: Rudy Bakalov r_baka...@yahoo.com Cc: FlexRadio reflector flexradio@flex-radio.biz Date: Thursday, December 10, 2009, 1:44

Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting

2009-12-10 Thread George Steube
-boun...@flex-radio.biz [mailto:flexradio-boun...@flex-radio.biz]on Behalf Of K0DAN Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 4:35 PM To: FlexRadio reflector Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting Speaking of logging software, have any FLEX users out there interfaced LOGic to their SDR radios

Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting

2009-12-10 Thread Bob Tracy
Rudy asked: 2) Can the F5K accept all CAT commands as one string? The Kenwood CAT protocol uses a 150ms pacing. So, if 2 seperate commands (select ANT and PTT line) are sent before TX there would be at least a 300ms and maybe as much as 450ms delay. The polling runs all the time so depending when

Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting

2009-12-10 Thread K0DAN
To: George Steube a...@bellsouth.net Cc: flex list flexradio@flex-radio.biz Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2009 8:20 PM Subject: Re: [Flexradio] Fwd: More Flex in contesting i second that motion dxLab work GREAT dan, w5xz --- On Fri, 12/11/09, George Steube a...@bellsouth.net wrote