, digital
programs, etc? Makes you wonder
Pete WA2ODO
- Original Message -
From: Jerry Flanders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] differences between PSK31 demodulators
At 02
What does it make you wonder, Pete?
73,
Bob, K5KDN
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Pete M
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 3:37 PM
To: Jerry Flanders
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] differences between PSK31 demodulators
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dudley Hurry
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2008 9:12 PM
To: Brian Lloyd
Cc: FlexRadio Reflector
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] differences between PSK31 demodulators
Brian,
Try DM780 that comes with Ham Radio Deluxe. You have to download the
entire HRD package, but then you can run
: Re: [Flexradio] differences between PSK31 demodulators
Brian,
Try DM780 that comes with Ham Radio Deluxe. You have to download the
entire HRD package, but then you can run only DM-780 for the digital.
In the Super Browser, you can have 20 to 30 PSK QSOs going at once,
and it's decode rate
On Jul 20, 2008, at 3:56 AM, Bob McGwier wrote:
There are some not understood faults in the use of VAC, it being
closed
source, etc.
The following is a general rule of thumb. Open on the PowerSDR
side, a VAC
cable that is a integer divisor of the sample rate in the radio.
That is
On Jul 20, 2008, at 8:29 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
After initially buying and trying VAC just because everybody does
it, I gave it up and use conventional audio cables now.
I am beginning to think I may have to do just that. Right now I am
using an audio cable to my Mac which is running
At 02:28 PM 7/20/2008, Brian Lloyd wrote:
SNIP
If there ever was a compelling reason to use VAC, I missed it. Given
its faults, why is VAC still being recommended?
What else can replace it?
I bought a lifetime supply of these for less than I paid for VAC:
At 02:22 PM 7/20/2008, K0VM wrote:
Jerry,
I guess that VAC is still recommended , because for many of us,
the current, paid for,version works reliably!
I wonder if the hiccups don't reveal themselves in ordinary digital
mode use, where the only person listening to the transmitted signal
is
On Jul 20, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
At 02:28 PM 7/20/2008, Brian Lloyd wrote:
SNIP
If there ever was a compelling reason to use VAC, I missed it. Given
its faults, why is VAC still being recommended?
What else can replace it?
I bought a lifetime supply of these for less
-Original Message-
From: Brian Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 3:18 PM
To: Jerry Flanders
Cc: Bob McGwier; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] differences between PSK31 demodulators
On Jul 20, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
At 02:28
-
From: Brian Lloyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 3:18 PM
To: Jerry Flanders
Cc: Bob McGwier; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] differences between PSK31 demodulators
On Jul 20, 2008, at 11:53 AM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
At 02:28 PM 7/20/2008, Brian Lloyd wrote
On Jul 20, 2008, at 1:29 PM, Jerry Flanders wrote:
Hmmm. Seems like a recommendation of this sort should have been
based on engineering considerations, not philosophical ones.
My transmitted RTTY is now 100% garble-free. Is 90-95% good enough
for everybody else?
I understand Jerry and
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, my current hypothesis is that there is some high-priority
process that is part of Windows that is causing a problem...
The way this problem is addressed under Linux is by using the so-called rt
version of the kernel,
Hurdle the dead
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Frank Brickle
Sent: Sunday, July 20, 2008 6:28 PM
To: Brian Lloyd
Cc: flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: Re: [Flexradio] differences between PSK31 demodulators
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 2:36 PM
On Jul 20, 2008, at 6:35 PM, Bob McGwier wrote:
What Frank suggests and what Brian suggested before: modify threading
priorities, has been done for the audio threads in PowerSDR for,
literally,
years. All threads in PowerSDR can be run at real time through a
setting in
the Setup
Making progress here. VAC is working and I am trying different digital-
mode applications. It is interesting to see how different the quality
of the copy is. I have my MacBook Pro connected via analog cable to
line out and am using CocoaModem to monitor the off-air signal as I
fumble with
Reflector
Subject: [Flexradio] differences between PSK31 demodulators
Making progress here. VAC is working and I am trying different digital-
mode applications. It is interesting to see how different the quality
of the copy is. I have my MacBook Pro connected via analog cable to
line out and am using
On Jul 19, 2008, at 12:22 AM, Tim Ellison wrote:
Are you using the demo version of VAC?
No. I paid for it. They gave me a link for download. I presume this is
the full version. It isn't asking for a serial number or anything.
If so, the decode errors are from the embedded voice that says
Brian,
Try DM780 that comes with Ham Radio Deluxe. You have to download the
entire HRD package, but then you can run only DM-780 for the digital.
In the Super Browser, you can have 20 to 30 PSK QSOs going at once,
and it's decode rate is better than MixW I think..
73,
Dudley
WA5QPZ
19 matches
Mail list logo
