On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 21:28 -0500, Allen Boehm wrote:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pyerlbridge/
I had found this site while searching Python sources. Don't know if
it will be of help or interest, but decided to post it anyway as I was
following the thread.
On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 20:23 -0400, Frank Brickle wrote:
On Sun, 2006-08-27 at 23:10 +0100, Bob Cowdery wrote:
Ok. But something in this system has to be *the* application.
Yes, we're on very different wavelengths, because I don't see this at
all, not at all. I see the system as a
Can someone help me out please?
I have recently upgraded my PC and am reinstalling various things, such
as PowerSDR. However, I cannot get the program to run...
To give all the details that you may need about the new processor, the
new board is running an AMD Sempron 3300 processor (at 2GHz),
Eric,
I tried the latest SVN binary this weekend and the problem seems to be fixed
- the audio sounded good without having to set the process priority to
'real-time.' In fact, it sounded good with the 'normal' setting.
Pete, N3EVL
-Original Message-
From: Eric Wachsmann
Hi Dave
Have you verified that Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 is installed ?
73 José
David Ackrill a écrit :
Can someone help me out please?
I have recently upgraded my PC and am reinstalling various things, such
as PowerSDR. However, I cannot get the program to run...
To give all the
David,
It seems to me that you need the Direct X package. It can bedownloaded
free from Microsoft.
73 de Ignacio, EB4APL
--
David Ackrill wrote:
Can someone help me out please?
I have
David, there is also a nice utility that is sometimes helpful called
dxdiag, on my XP system it is installed in C:\WINDOWS\System32\.
The utility displays everything it can determine about your DirectX
installation.
de ken n9vv
David Ackrill wrote:
Can someone help me out please?
I have
Thanks Ignacio,
That was exactly what the problem was!
Now back up and running on the new PC, but not yet calibrated it again. HI.
Thanks again.
Dave (G0DJA)
EB4APL wrote:
David,
It seems to me that you need the Direct X package. It can bedownloaded
free from Microsoft.
73 de Ignacio,
Great! Thanks for the report Pete. :)
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 6:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; flexradio@flex-radio.biz
Subject: RE: [Flexradio] Crackle on Received Audio...
Anyone know of a Firebox driver for Windows 2000 NT or is this unit only
capable of operating with XP?
73 Joel W5ZN
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive
According to their website it is limited to XP.
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
radio.biz] On Behalf Of Joel Harrison
Sent: Monday, August 28, 2006 10:49 AM
To: 'FlexList'
Subject: [Flexradio] Firebox and
Just curious what I should expect on a comparison of rcve sensitivity
between the SDR-1000 and KW TS-850 on 10 meters. With one watt of
transmitted RF on FM between two stations 18.6 miles distant, the unit
we tested shows the 850 as a winner by a long shot. I am not talking
about S-meter
Radio Station W5AMI wrote:
Just curious what I should expect on a comparison of rcve sensitivity
between the SDR-1000 and KW TS-850 on 10 meters. With one watt of
transmitted RF on FM between two stations 18.6 miles distant, the unit
we tested shows the 850 as a winner by a long shot. I am
what performance difference do you see between the 850 and SDR using side
band on 10 meters?
FM signals take the IF from a noise spectrum to a square wave (limited)
spectrum. you may be operating the SDR IF within it's dynamic range, i.e.,
the IF is not in haard limiting. maybe a little more
Hi
Had a problem during the BARTG contest and verified during the SCC(using
then SVN652 and now with 654).
The SDR-1000 was set to xmit lower sideband in the digl mode. The
display
showed it to be transmitting OK (mark=2.125kHz below the indicated
frequency). It actually was
Which soundcard are you using? It sounds like you may have the output
cables reversed (i.e. the left channel is connected where the right channel
should be and vice versa).
Eric Wachsmann
FlexRadio Systems
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To be fair to the two radios you mentioned, that was on FM, and any
audio mode that needs a wide frequency response is notoriously difficult
to be subjective about...
Having been an AM CBer in the the UK, I quickly noticed that FM CB rigs
that became legal in the UK did not seem to do as well
Guys,
I have a 940SAT I am getting ready to sell sitting alongside the SDR
which beats it hands down on most everything except nostalgia, using
same antennas.
chas, w1cg
At 02:36 PM 8/28/2006, Cecilio Bayona wrote:
Radio Station W5AMI wrote:
Just curious what I should expect on a
On 8/28/06, philip gentile [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what performance difference do you see between the 850 and SDR using side
band on 10 meters?
We will try SSB and AM next time.
On 8/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please check your DSP/AGC settings when performing receiver
Make sure the AGC Max Gain is set to a high value if you are using v1.6.2
release. It is now called RF on the latest SVN version. If this is set too
low you will not get maximum sensitivity. On the SVN version set it all the
way to the right. Sensitivity should be around -130 dBm in 500 Hz
I was up on 20 PSK (14.070) and suddenly started hearing a raspy CW note
that obviously was not the primary signal. The signal went on long enough
for me to move down the band and identify it. W1AW running CW on 14.047.
Their signal was well over S9 here.
I had not experienced
At 05:31 PM 8/28/2006, you wrote:
I was up on 20 PSK (14.070) and suddenly started hearing a raspy
CW note
that obviously was not the primary signal. The signal went on long enough
for me to move down the band and identify it. W1AW running CW on 14.047.
Their signal was well over S9
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20060828/bc87be67/attachment.html
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman
/20060828/bc87be67/attachment
.html
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http
/recheck 'RFE Present' each time Preamp gain is
changed.
Posted as bug report but not sure if html went thru.
Phil, K3IB
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
/pipermail/flexradio_flex-radio.biz/attachments/20060828/bc87be67/attachment
.html
Hi Eric
You are so so right! That was the problem(Delta44). My fault. Put in
Radio
Scack isolation transformers 3 weeks ago. Leads were reversed. All is well
now. Still do not know how to adjust the xmit image. I see no change when
moving the sliders while monitoring the image on another
/20060828/8f54b72b/attachment.html
___
FlexRadio mailing list
FlexRadio@flex-radio.biz
http://mail.flex-radio.biz/mailman/listinfo/flexradio_flex-radio.biz
Archive Link: http://www.mail-archive.com/flexradio%40flex-radio.biz/
FlexRadio Homepage: http
27 matches
Mail list logo
