Re: [Flightgear-devel] The bouncing plane

2002-01-04 Thread Sergio
I think we could concentrate our effort to evaluate some parameters in way to verify a good or bad landing and so we can also generate a sort of damage relatory acording to situation. Sergio Roth - Original Message - From: Thales de Lima Ferreira [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear TLE

2002-01-04 Thread Erik Hofman
David Megginson wrote: Graphic Artists --- We also need a couple of good icons, one for the application and one for its data files. I made a crappy one depicting a 3/4 view of a inexplicably greenish Cessna 310 in a steep turn, and will use it if no one develops anything

[Flightgear-devel] Command-line arguments

2002-01-04 Thread David Megginson
It's now possible to pass property files as simple command-line arguments to the FlightGear application, as in fgfs start-at-lax.fgd The start-at-lax.fgd file would probably look something like this: PropertyList sim startup airport-idKLAX/airport-id /startup /sim

RE: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear TLE

2002-01-04 Thread Norman Vine
David Megginson writes: Norman Vine writes: The general rule of thumb for portable applications is to use the lowest common denominator or in the case filenames use the 8.3 rule max 8 letters for a file or directory name max 3 letters for a file extension do not use case

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Why not use FS2002 aircraft files?

2002-01-04 Thread Cameron Moore
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] (throttle1000) [2002.01.04 21:26]: That would add about 2000 different aircrafts in one night to the FGFS. There should only be an additional FGFS file which would give those parameters that are not found in MSFS files. And that could be some default file for most new