[Flightgear-devel] ATC

2002-05-18 Thread David Findlay
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Wonder if we could use some of this stuff. http://www.openatc.org David -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE85fsZx58m2d272NoRAspWAJ0fySpRWprmXDadVXK/hxaTzj285gCgnlcd

[Flightgear-devel] Re: I simply don't know what I'm doing wrong

2002-05-18 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Keith Wiley -- Saturday 18 May 2002 00:26: Should I just scrap my entire flightgear directory, throw it away, and start over from scratch? As a last resort, maybe. But you still didn't investigate the bug that you originally reported: remember do ble?

[Flightgear-devel] Cheaper 3D clouds?

2002-05-18 Thread Erik Hofman
Hi, Another approach to cliud modelling could be found here: http://nis-lab.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~nis/abs_cgi.html#pg01 Looking at the images it has about the same looks, but seems to be cheaper in CPU/GPU performance: http://nis-lab.is.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~nis/img/cmlcloud1s.jpg

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: I simply don't know what I'm doing wrong

2002-05-18 Thread Keith Wiley
As a last resort, maybe. But you still didn't investigate the bug that you originally reported: remember do ble? /usr/local/src/FlightGear/src/Main/fg_init.cxx:628: undefined reference to `FGNullFDM::FGNullFDM(do ble)' Have you ever looked into fg_init.cxx, line 628? (Things have

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: I simply don't know what I'm doing wrong

2002-05-18 Thread Frederic Bouvier
When you cvs update FlightGear, do you also cvs update SimGear ? Cheers, -Fred - Original Message - From: Keith Wiley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 7:28 PM Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: I simply don't know what I'm doing wrong As a last

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: I simply don't know what I'm doing wrong

2002-05-18 Thread Keith Wiley
When you cvs update FlightGear, do you also cvs update SimGear ? Ugh! Usually I start with plib, move to SimGear, then move to FlightGear. But when FlightGear starts causing trouble for me, I suppose I just revert to trying to cvs update FlightGear. I guess that won't work though. That

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: I simply don't know what I'm doing wrong

2002-05-18 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Do you retry now with plib, SimGear and FlightGear in sync. What are your actual error messages ? -Fred - Original Message - From: Keith Wiley [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2002 8:00 PM Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: I simply don't know what I'm

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: I simply don't know what I'm doing wrong

2002-05-18 Thread Alex Perry
Do you retry now with plib, SimGear and FlightGear in sync. What are your actual error messages ? Further on that topic, I've got a script redoing that I need about once every couple of months. It does CVS with explicit -APd against the six trees, builds simgear from clean with reinstall,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: I simply don't know what I'm doing wrong

2002-05-18 Thread Julian Foad
Another idea: you might have old versions of SimGear, plib or other libraries installed somewhere. This should find exactly one copy of libsgsky: $ find /usr -name 'libsg*' -exec grep -l getSpan_m {} \; /usr/local/lib/libsgsky.a If it finds none or more than one, there's a problem with the

[Flightgear-devel] Bad line endings when running on windows

2002-05-18 Thread Frederic Bouvier
The telnet interface produce wrong line ending when I run both FlightGear and the telnet client on Win2k. I've just sent a patch to Curt that produce line ending based on the platform where fgfs is running ( something between #ifdef and #endif ). For the moment, this patch only address the issue

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bad line endings when running on windows

2002-05-18 Thread Julian Foad
Frederic Bouvier wrote: The telnet interface produce wrong line ending when I run both FlightGear and the telnet client on Win2k. I've just sent a patch to Curt that produce line ending based on the platform where fgfs is running ( something between #ifdef and #endif ). For the moment,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bad line endings when running on windows

2002-05-18 Thread Julian Foad
I (Julian Foad) wrote: Idea: the receiver should accept any of these four line endings: Sorry, I misunderstood. I was thinking of a peer-to-peer type connection. - Julian ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bad line endings when running on windows

2002-05-18 Thread Julian Foad
Frederic Bouvier wrote: Perhaps I didn't made me clear. The problem is when FlightGear send text to the telnet client. Each line begins where the previous ends because Win2k telnet client needs a cariage return (\r) with the line feed (\n). OK. The Telnet protocol (RFC854) requires that line

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bad line endings when running on windows

2002-05-18 Thread Bernie Bright
Frederic Bouvier wrote: The telnet interface produce wrong line ending when I run both FlightGear and the telnet client on Win2k. I've just sent a patch to Curt that produce line ending based on the platform where fgfs is running ( something between #ifdef and #endif ). For the moment,