Hi,
I found anouther Freeware JavaScript implementation which looks smaller
than the one provided bij Mozilla and supports ECMA Script level 3. It
isn't much smaller, but at least it is completely LGPL.
http://www.bbassett.net/njs/
Erik
___
Jim Wilson writes:
This is in the c172: http://www.spiderbark.com/fgfs/c1723d-panel-1.png
Looks like the 3D panel is raised up off the panel's plane a bit (you can
see the yoke sort of in the middle of the RPM guage in this shot).
Yes, that's my fault. I raised it a bit so that the mag
Gene Buckle writes:
Along this vein, how about a wingtip smoke system? Red and blue smoke
would look VERY cool.
Funny you should mention that -- plib has a new (mostly undocumented)
particle system designed for just that sort of thing. I'm not getting
through to SourceForge right now, so
Jim Wilson writes:
That and we should probably make the pilot be able to salute.
Now that would be easy, but he needs an arm first!
Thumbs up first, please.
Might be fun to do an eject too :-)
He'll need his own FDM, then.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL
David Megginson writes:
(I'd love a programming environment on my Palm V, for example)
Hmm.. I sense a potential Python convert lurking in these words :-)
http://pippy.sf.net
Enjoy
Norman
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cameron Moore writes:
I think it's safe to say that there are two contenders at this point:
Scheme and Lua. I'd never heard of Lua until this thread, but I've seen
Scheme. I would expect that we would use Guile for a Scheme
interpreter. How big is Guile? Has anyone ever used Lua?
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Aside from locating 8 suitable machines/monitors, the big issue is
that paying the union fees for moving this stuff 20 feet across the
loading doc would be extremely prohibitive. :-(
You need 8 notebooks with big LCD panels and GeForce cards, together
with small
Cameron Moore writes:
Here's another dumb suggestion: It would be pretty cool is someone
would turn off the sun at night. This is a known issue[1], but it's a
pretty glaring (no pun intended) bug.
Yes, I've had this discussion as well. The sun should stop being a
light source once
David Megginson writes:
-- plib has a new (mostly undocumented)
particle system designed for just that sort of thing.
Have you seen
http://toobular.sf.net
Norman
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
David Megginson writes:
Cameron Moore writes:
Here's another dumb suggestion: It would be pretty cool is someone
would turn off the sun at night. This is a known issue[1],
but it's a
pretty glaring (no pun intended) bug.
Yes, I've had this discussion as well. The sun should stop being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 29 Jun 2002 05:53, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I was just looking at the external view of the blue angels a4 ...
If someone wanted to really waste some time it might be kind of neat
to animate the helmet based on the direction of the internal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can the viewing angle now be set via the network interface? Thanks,
David
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE9HaF9ZOfFgbBAbXARAmWTAJ9XDsp69ns9H9t9+od14oJMi3bHjwCgoXUJ
David Megginson wrote:
Andy Ross writes:
But the language itself is pretty mild. It's a lot like perl and
python -- hashes and vectors are the core data structures, with syntax
support for common idioms like regular expressions and function
calling. Object naming is represented
On Fri, 28 Jun 2002, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andy Ross) wrote:
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2002 23:15:31 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andy Ross)
Subject: [Plib-devel] New font / updated patch
[...]
Plib folks: this patch supersedes the one I sent yesterday.
Andy Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jim Wilson wrote:
One thing I'm wondering is if we can do away with the background
texture in the 3-D panel. Do we need it or can the backplane always
be part of the model? Not sure if this would fix the problem with the
3-D model/instrument or not.
David Megginson wrote:
So, Andy, here's your challenge -- you wrote YASim to prove how small
and simple an FDM could be; how about showing us how small and simple
a JavaScript implementation can be? I'm sure FlightGear isn't the
only project that would benefit.
Yikes, don't tempt me. You
David Megginson writes:
That's what I had thought as well, but it turned out not to be the
case. The string constructor is expensive, and we ended up using lots
(and lots and lots of them), running, as we were, 30-100 iterations
per second through hundreds of properties. Switching from string
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 06:58:07 -0700 (PDT),
Gene Buckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A number of Bf-109 pilots would have the slats bolted into the
retracted position to keep a asymetrical slat deployment from
ruining a gun attack.
..this was a designed in feature,
Andy Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Also, by way of the A-4 cockpit: I checked in an AoA indexer mini
panel last night that sits up by the windscreen edge as an example of
having more than one 3D panel. There's not geometry to go with it
yet, just a texture floating in the air.
Cool! I'll
Jim Wilson wrote:
Andy Ross wrote:
But I also goofed and checked in some of my private changes. The
eyepoint is slightly higher, allowing the pilot to look straight
down the nose as I believe is true for the real aircraft (it
radically improves visibility at high AoA's).
You probably
Andy Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Of course, a real pilot would be able to physically move his head by a
few inches.
Yes and actually they can move their head left a right a bit to see better
too. I'm not opposed to fudging things a bit to allow for the limitations of
flying on a PC. For
21 matches
Mail list logo