On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:31:53 -0600,
Mike Bonar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thursday 16 January 2003 09:41, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Arnt Karlsen writes:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:16:36 -0600,
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL
Jim Wilson writes:
Look for an include file plib/psl.h. If it's not there, then plib 1.6
didn't include PSL (and I will #ifdef it out).
Yes, that's the problem. It isn't there.
OK, I'll fix it now.
Thanks,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Jim Wilson writes:
Actually there is another problem. The makefile is being generated with
plibpsl included, which doesn't exist in 1.6.
Thanks -- I'll try to fix that as well.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
I've made all PSL support in FlightGear conditional now, so there
should be no more build problems with the official plib 1.6 release.
Could someone using plib 1.6 do a CVS update and rebuild to confirm?
You'll need to do
sh autogen.sh
./configure
(I think they happen automatically, but it
Hi guys!
I made a progress in creating lightlobes
I insert multitexture support in flightgear
I got no framerate drop using 2 textures on geforce3
so now I have a question
there are several techniques to calculate lightmaps dymanic position
1) simple calculating in CPU ( no special card required)
Any thought to using ANT as part of the build process?
http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/index.html
Michael Bonar
I
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Jonathan,
I've got behind reading my mail from this list, and I've only just read
this mail from a while ago about this and the later error you had in
ATCVoice.cxx. I've commited Norman's fixes for both files to the cvs, so
if you could do a clean checkout of the ATC subdirectory and check I
I'm not looking for or expecting a concensus on this, but I'd be
interested in people's thoughts relative to the attached message.
This raises a number of difficult issues, and I'd be even more
interested in people's thoughts on the larger issues.
---BeginMessage---
Good day.
My name is Henti
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:20:02 -0600
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not looking for or expecting a concensus on this, but
I'd be
My quick reply (I'm almost off to lunch) given with no
thought whatsoever (and without carefully reading all the
fine print) is to mention that JSBSim
Are there any elevation data sets out there for which full re-distribution
rights can be bought for a fairly modest sum of money? I'm pretty sure
someone might have mentioned the Japanese data as falling into this
catorgory at some point.
Anyway, its a thought, even if possibly of only the
I've made all PSL support in FlightGear conditional now, so there
should be no more build problems with the official plib 1.6 release.
Could someone using plib 1.6 do a CVS update and rebuild to confirm?
I still get this:
g++-2.95 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src/Include -I../..
Mike Bonar writes:
Any thought to using ANT as part of the build process?
http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/index.html
I love ant, but I don't want to require a JVM just to build
FlightGear.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
Ever since upgrading from automake-1.4 to 1.5, the messages shown on screen
while compiling Flightgear have got far more verbose, with stuff about
tmpfiles and deps being output, and this is even worse with automake-1.7
that comes with the latest Cygwin. Is there any way of getting rid of all
the
Curtis L. Olson writes:
I'm not looking for or expecting a concensus on this, but I'd be
interested in people's thoughts relative to the attached message.
This raises a number of difficult issues, and I'd be even more
interested in people's thoughts on the larger issues.
We don't really
David Luff writes:
Are there any elevation data sets out there for which full
re-distribution rights can be bought for a fairly modest sum of
money? I'm pretty sure someone might have mentioned the Japanese
data as falling into this catorgory at some point.
I checked the Canadian data,
Major A writes:
I still get this:
g++-2.95 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src/Include -I../.. -I../../src
-I/usr/local/SimGear/include -I/usr/X11R6/include
-DPKGLIBDIR=\/usr/local/FlightGear/lib/FlightGear\ -g -O2 -c -o location.o `test -f
location.cxx || echo './'`location.cxx
On 1/17/03 at 1:21 PM David Megginson wrote:
I checked the Canadian data, thinking that I might be willing to
invest a hundred or two for the sake of having good Canadian GIS data
online. For nationwide elevation and general GIS vector data, my
government wants CAD 1M (USD 650K) for a closed
Curt wrote:
Of course if everyone is happy with any money going straight into
Curt's big screen TV fund, that would be a *lot* simpler in the long
run. :-)
David Megginson writes:
Why do you need a TV when you have a computer with a text editor and a
C++ compiler? Jeesh.
This is to
David Luff writes:
Ever since upgrading from automake-1.4 to 1.5, the messages shown on screen
while compiling Flightgear have got far more verbose, with stuff about
tmpfiles and deps being output, and this is even worse with automake-1.7
that comes with the latest Cygwin. Is there any way of
Curtis L. Olson writes:
This is to distract the 2 year old so that I have a bit of time to
use the text editor computer and C++ compiler. So really it's a
legitimate FlightGear need. :-)
Two year olds are usually happy watching the clothes drier spin round
and round. I still suspect
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:07:54 -0500
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two year olds are usually happy watching the clothes drier spin round
and round. I still suspect some involvement from the father here.
Instead of 1 two-year old, try 2 one-year olds. I've
gotten fairly good at
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:26:20 -0600,
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Curt wrote:
Of course if everyone is happy with any money going straight into
Curt's big screen TV fund, that would be a *lot* simpler in the
long run. :-)
David Megginson
On Friday 17 January 2003 12:31 pm, Jon S Berndt wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 11:20:02 -0600
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not looking for or expecting a concensus on this, but
I'd be
My quick reply (I'm almost off to lunch) given with no
thought whatsoever (and without
On Friday 17 January 2003 3:07 pm, David Megginson wrote:
Curtis L. Olson writes:
This is to distract the 2 year old so that I have a bit of time to
use the text editor computer and C++ compiler. So really it's a
legitimate FlightGear need. :-)
Two year olds are usually happy
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 02:17:37PM -0600, Jon S Berndt wrote:
Instead of 1 two-year old, try 2 one-year olds. I've
gotten fairly good at programming in 4 minute chunks.
That's about how long my twins will stay occupied inside a
circle of toys, get bored, then crawl twenty feet to my
James A. Treacy writes:
Instead of 2 one-year olds, try two 7 week olds. I wish I could get 4
minutes to do some programming. Of course, I guess you already went
through that stage to get where you are. :)
At least you get to sleep through the night.
Ok, I have to relate one story here.
David Megginson writes:
Two year olds are usually happy watching the clothes drier spin round
and round. I still suspect some involvement from the father here.
The only thing we've found that have entertained her longer than 4
minutes is lipstick, permanent markers, and the dog's water dish.
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 15:30:45 -0500
James A. Treacy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of 2 one-year olds, try two 7 week olds. I wish I could get 4
minutes to do some programming. Of course, I guess you already went
through that stage to get where you are. :)
At least you get to sleep through
John Check writes:
You can have the TV, but you can't watch anything but Barney
I thought the reason the U.S. still has capital punishment was to
spare people that.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.megginson.com/
Thanks for catching that. I've patched up src/Main/Makefile.am, and
would be grateful if you could do a cvs update and make. There's no
need to rebuild from scratch.
It now works fine, thanks a lot! I like the terminal building at
KSFO...
Also, now that I give the mem=nopentium option to
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:03:17 -0500
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Check writes:
You can have the TV, but you can't watch anything but Barney
I thought the reason the U.S. still has capital
punishment was to spare people that.
Actually, watching Barney *is* a form of capital
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 14:46:19 -0600
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
she's clearly hurt. Of course she was just fine and faking it to get
our attention, but if this is an early sign of the cleverness to come,
I think we are in big trouble ... :-)
Now I've had to spend the whole day
Major A writes:
It now works fine, thanks a lot! I like the terminal building at
KSFO...
You get the prize for being the first to notice -- congrats (I sneaked
it into the base package CVS fairly quietly). It's just a roughing-in
of the new International Terminal, but I'll try to fill in
Jon S Berndt writes:
Child: Mommy!
Daddy: She's not here.
Child: Daddy!
Mommy: He's not here, either.
Child: !? ... ? ... ... snore
20 years and $50,000 later:
Therapist: So why do you think you have this pathological fear of
abandonment?
All the best,
David
--
David
Knowing the route helps. Before starting I did a test run in the clear and
found you could go back to the bridge (easy landmark) and head SW from there.
Probably making it through the notch. I got just about all the way through
and got hungup in a loop at a tile change (something to do
Good point. Nuf said.
Mike
On Friday 17 January 2003 12:15, David Megginson wrote:
Mike Bonar writes:
Any thought to using ANT as part of the build process?
http://jakarta.apache.org/ant/index.html
I love ant, but I don't want to require a JVM just to build
FlightGear.
All
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:25:10 -0500
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Major A writes:
It now works fine, thanks a lot! I like the terminal building at
KSFO...
You get the prize for being the first to notice -- congrats (I sneaked
it into the base package CVS fairly quietly).
On Friday 17 January 2003 12:21, David Megginson wrote:
David Luff writes:
Are there any elevation data sets out there for which full
re-distribution rights can be bought for a fairly modest sum of
money? I'm pretty sure someone might have mentioned the Japanese
data as falling
David Megginson writes:
Jon S Berndt writes:
Child: Mommy!
Daddy: She's not here.
Child: Daddy!
Mommy: He's not here, either.
Child: !? ... ? ... ... snore
20 years and $50,000 later:
Therapist: So why do you think you have this pathological fear of
abandonment?
Major A writes:
This is a really good one, David -- I think I would end up with
s*** in my pants if I had to do this for real!
Dead people don't care if they have clean underwear, despite all the
warnings your mother gave you as a kid.
I think it's a generational thing -- in my so-far
Bernie Bright writes:
If you are interested I have an overhead shot of KSFO. You can't
see taxiway signs or windsocks but it does show the relative
positioning of the terminal, gates, hangars and other ancillary
buildings.
Yes, please. I can get the positioning from the NOAA airport
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 12:46, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
James A. Treacy writes:
Instead of 2 one-year olds, try two 7 week olds. I wish I could get 4
minutes to do some programming. Of course, I guess you already went
through that stage to get where you are. :)
At least you get to sleep
David,
as an interim report, the guy with the FS98 add-on KSFO scenery did not
answer until now (but mail did not bounce either). I'll stay tuned, but
doubt he will... it's just been so long ago and he did never provide
upgrades for FS2000/2 .
I fear you'll have to find pictures and stuff
David,
the link you provided might be of help here:
http://edj.net/cgi-bin/echoplate.pl?SouthWest/SFO_.GIF
It's only 2D, but it gives you a good idea where things are.
Andras
===
Major Andras
e-mail: [EMAIL
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003 16:11:38 -0600,
Mike Bonar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Friday 17 January 2003 05:06, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:31:53 -0600,
Mike Bonar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
You know, I still have
Michael Basler writes:
as an interim report, the guy with the FS98 add-on KSFO scenery did not
answer until now (but mail did not bounce either). I'll stay tuned, but
doubt he will... it's just been so long ago and he did never provide
upgrades for FS2000/2 .
I fear you'll have to
Major A writes:
Anyone know of a new runway at LHBP (Budapest Ferihegy), or where I
can find more up-to-date information about it?
Depending on how good your Hungarian is, you can try this:
http://www.bud-airport.hu/
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Major A writes:
the link you provided might be of help here:
http://edj.net/cgi-bin/echoplate.pl?SouthWest/SFO_.GIF
It's only 2D, but it gives you a good idea where things are.
Yes, I've been using that NOAA facilities plate for the airport. It's
especially useful because it has
Dave,
Worked like a champ. A few more instances of this have turned up, and
I can supply diffs if you are interested.
Thanks,
Jonathan Polley
On Friday, January 17, 2003, at 10:39 AM, David Luff wrote:
Jonathan,
I've got behind reading my mail from this list, and I've only just read
Anyone know of a new runway at LHBP (Budapest Ferihegy), or where I
can find more up-to-date information about it?
Depending on how good your Hungarian is, you can try this:
http://www.bud-airport.hu/
Thanks, my Hungarian is fine, but there is no information on that site
that I
If you really want LHX, I can send you my copy.
It's so old I doubt anyone sells it anymore. I think that
might have been the first flight sim I played too.
Curiouser and curiouser.
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003 19:31:53 -0600,
Mike Bonar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL
51 matches
Mail list logo
