David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Spott writes:
This is why I simply don't understand why they had to go. Would anyone be so
kind to give me an unbiased explanation ? Did Erik fail to follow
differentiation in the available land cover data or has anything else been
Martin Spott writes:
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Spott writes:
This is why I simply don't understand why they had to go. Would anyone be so
kind to give me an unbiased explanation ? Did Erik fail to follow
differentiation in the available land cover data or has
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Spott writes:
The current state still does not make much sense to me,
Originally we had 5 unique crop textures and 5 corresponding material
property entries.
On April 25, those 5 material property entries were pointed at 3
nearly identical
Michael Selig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Earlier today I added an ornithopter model to
FlightGear. The model simulates the full scale
piloted C-GPTR ornithopter designed by Prof
DeLaurier and his group at the University of
Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies (UTIAS).
This looks great !
At 6/5/03, Martin Spott wrote:
Michael Selig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Earlier today I added an ornithopter model to
FlightGear. The model simulates the full scale
piloted C-GPTR ornithopter designed by Prof
DeLaurier and his group at the University of
Toronto Institute for Aerospace Studies
At 6/5/03, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Michael Selig wrote:
cvs admin -kb
Then run a cvs update to sync the flag on your local copy.
Done. Thanks. And I think it all worked.
Thanks Michael, I can see the 3D model now.
While you're at it, you have add a dos file into CVS from a Linux
machine.
At 6/4/03, Jim Wilson wrote:
Michael Selig [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So far, nothing is going on w/ a 3D cockpit. But if someone wants to do
this, I have photos of the actual cockpit.
Great. Can you send them? Not sure how much I'll get done when, but I can
give it a start.
Yes, I can send
Michael Selig wrote :
I now have a program crash with this aero model. It appears that
Throttle_pct_input_ntime is used at uiuc_engine.cpp:88 before
being initialised at uiuc_menu_engine.cpp:160. On MSVC, default
values for uninitialized data is not 0, so it goes bezerk with a
negative array
David Culp wrote :
just a note to say that I am in the process of modelling an
Airbus A320 :
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fb-fgsd.png
Here is another one, with your flight model :
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fb-fgfs-1.png
Beautiful model Fred! Here
http://www.vis-sim.org/news_comm.asp?ref=4235
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
I am trying to animate the rudder but it seems that the property
/surface-positions/rudder-pos-norm stay at 0.
My mistake. The FCS didn't have an aerosurface-scale for the rudder. In
fact, none of my models have it, so I'll have to add it to them all (thanks
for the catch). Here's the
Hi,
Just flying the B52 with all engines running, manually took her up to
10,000 feet, engaged autopilot to take her down to 1000 feet and to plot
a course back to KSF0.
Of course, minds do wander, so I messed with the cloud settings and
tried to make everything clear. Unfortunately I ended up
Having built the cvs version of FG under cygwin. I cannot see the terminal
at KSFO.
All the correct files (.stg and .ac)seem to be in the scenery folder.
If it is a Plib problem why would Plib handle the aircraft .ac files and not
the scenery .ac files.
The aircraft work fine.
Also is there any
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 23:46, Matthew Johnson wrote:
Hi,
Just flying the B52 with all engines running, manually took her up to
10,000 feet, engaged autopilot to take her down to 1000 feet and to plot
a course back to KSF0.
Of course, minds do wander, so I messed with the cloud settings
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
David Culp wrote :
just a note to say that I am in the process of modelling an
Airbus A320 :
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fb-fgsd.png
Here is another one, with your flight model :
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fb-fgfs-1.png
Very nice!
Erik Hofman wrote:
just a note to say that I am in the process of modelling an
Airbus A320 :
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fb-fgsd.png
Here is another one, with your flight model :
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/a320-fb-fgfs-1.png
Very nice!
Thanks
Matthew Johnson wrote:
Hi,
Just flying the B52 with all engines running, manually took her up to
10,000 feet, engaged autopilot to take her down to 1000 feet and to plot
a course back to KSF0.
Of course, minds do wander, so I messed with the cloud settings and
tried to make everything clear.
Innis Cunningham wrote:
Having built the cvs version of FG under cygwin. I cannot see the
terminal at KSFO.
All the correct files (.stg and .ac)seem to be in the scenery folder.
If it is a Plib problem why would Plib handle the aircraft .ac files and
not the scenery .ac files.
The aircraft work
Michael Selig [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'd like people to try this out:
In the preferences.xml, change the line:
eye-heading-deg-path/orientation/heading-deg/eye-heading-deg-path
... line 126, for chase view (view #2)
to
On 6/6/03 at 2:49 PM Innis Cunningham wrote:
Having built the cvs version of FG under cygwin. I cannot see the
terminal
at KSFO.
All the correct files (.stg and .ac)seem to be in the scenery folder.
If it is a Plib problem why would Plib handle the aircraft .ac files and
not
the scenery .ac
Fred wrote:
I have another problem: the model seems underpower and it is not able to
take of with full throttle on the KSFO runway. It stall under 160knt and
it arrives at the end of the runway at 175knt.
I've been having a problem with the JSBSim airplanes sometimes
have no fuel in them, even
As an interim solution, here is a turbine module that no longer checks if
there is any fuel in the tanks. This turbine is always on, regardless of
fuel state. The module goes in FlightGear-0.9.2/src/FDM/JSBSim/
http://home.attbi.com/~davidculp2/FGSimTurbine.cpp
I'll see if the JSBSim
Having built the cvs version of FG under cygwin. I cannot see the
terminal
at KSFO.
All the correct files (.stg and .ac)seem to be in the scenery folder.
If it is a Plib problem why would Plib handle the aircraft .ac files and
not
the scenery .ac files.
The aircraft work fine.
Also is
David Culp wrote :
Fred wrote:
I have another problem: the model seems underpower and it is not able to
take of with full throttle on the KSFO runway. It stall under 160knt and
it arrives at the end of the runway at 175knt.
I've been having a problem with the JSBSim airplanes sometimes
Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
It (KSFO terminal) doesn't appear under Windows, only Linux. It appears to
No, No, I can see it untextured ( it has none ) with my MSVC build.
I don't have a special patch for that, just standard CVS.
It is a cygwin problem.
Actually, it starts to look like an
On 6 Jun 2003 at 9:00, Norman Vine wrote:
Innis Cunningham writes:
So any windows people managed to fix this.
Does it mean also if the file can be textured it will show?.
I would love to add some buildings but untill we get this little problem
sorted it will be a bit hard to see what
Actually, the better solution would be for us to fix it. Can you remind me
when this bug was reported (if you recall)? I'll try to have a look at it
in the very near future.
It looks like two bugs, which were discussed a month or two ago, although I
don't know if they were reported via an
So as to try and help with this problem.
On my system I have the 9.1 version of FG from the win binaries by Norman on
my E drive and the cvs build under cygwin on my H drive.
I have taken a copy of the scenery folder that contains the KSFO terminal
and put it in my win binaries version and the
Jon Berndt wrote:
Actually, the better solution would be for us to fix it. Can you remind me
when this bug was reported (if you recall)? I'll try to have a look at it
in the very near future.
This is probably the conflicting initial fuel load problem between
FlightGear and JSBSim. It looks
David Culp wrote:
It looks like two bugs, which were discussed a month or two ago, although I
don't know if they were reported via an official channel, partly because I'm
insecure enough in my coding ability to believe the problem is probably at my
end in every case.
Can you test if this file
Innis Cunningham wrote:
So as to try and help with this problem.
On my system I have the 9.1 version of FG from the win binaries by
Norman on my E drive and the cvs build under cygwin on my H drive.
I have taken a copy of the scenery folder that contains the KSFO
terminal and put it in my win
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Innis Cunningham wrote:
Having built the cvs version of FG under cygwin. I cannot see the
terminal at KSFO.
It might have to do something with the fact that the terminal building
is untextured. Plib seems to have some problem with untextured objects.
Get into an aircraft with autopilot (preferably one with 2D panel, e.g.
the c182), climb to some safe altitude, then switch the autopilot to
altitude lock. Now pitch up or down manually and watch the elevator
trim go to the opposite direction. While it is off, unlock the altitude.
The elevator
Melchior,
Going with the principle of least surprise, I prefer the current
behavior. If I'm flying along with the autopilot and everything is
nice and trimed out, then I disable the autopilot, with your patch I
could suddenly be catestrophically out of trim. I'd rather the
autopilot leaves the
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Get into an aircraft with autopilot (preferably one with 2D panel,
e.g. the c182), climb to some safe altitude, then switch the
autopilot to altitude lock. Now pitch up or down manually and watch
the elevator trim go to the opposite direction. While it is off,
unlock
* Curtis L. Olson -- Friday 06 June 2003 17:38:
Going with the principle of least surprise, I prefer the current
behavior. If I'm flying along with the autopilot and everything is
nice and trimed out, then I disable the autopilot, with your patch I
could suddenly be catestrophically out of
* Andy Ross -- Friday 06 June 2003 17:48:
This is actually the way real aircraft work.
Ahh, OK. Then please forget both patches. Hey, I can't always be right. ;-)
m.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 6/6/03, Jim Wilson wrote:
Michael Selig [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I'd like people to try this out:
In the preferences.xml, change the line:
eye-heading-deg-path/orientation/heading-deg/eye-heading-deg-path
... line 126, for chase view (view #2)
to
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Andy Ross wrote:
And you're exactly right that this can be dangerous. There was a
Airbus that crashed in (I think) Taiwan a few years ago for exactly
this reason. The pilot had accidentally put the autopilot into
go-around mode, so it was trying to climb. He had to hold
From: Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Get into an aircraft with autopilot (preferably one with 2D panel, e.g.
the c182), climb to some safe altitude, then switch the autopilot to
altitude lock. Now pitch up or down manually and watch the elevator
trim go to the opposite direction. While it is
Very good idea ! As it's one of the planes I fly, I might get hold of some
data too, and perform a few tests in flight...
--
Jorge Van Hemelryck
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jorge Van Hemelryck wrote:
Very good idea ! As it's one of the planes I fly, I might get hold of some
data too, and perform a few tests in flight...
Are you sure your passengers are going to like it when you do some
flight tests?
Erik
___
Curtis L. Olson writes:
Going with the principle of least surprise, I prefer the current
behavior. If I'm flying along with the autopilot and everything is
nice and trimed out, then I disable the autopilot, with your patch I
could suddenly be catestrophically out of trim. I'd rather the
Jorge Van Hemelryck wrote:
Very good idea ! As it's one of the planes I fly, I might get hold of some
data too, and perform a few tests in flight...
Are you sure your passengers are going to like it when you do some
flight tests?
Erik
If he flies for Aeroflot, they may not notice the
Melchior FRANZ writes:
Get into an aircraft with autopilot (preferably one with 2D panel, e.g.
the c182), climb to some safe altitude, then switch the autopilot to
altitude lock. Now pitch up or down manually and watch the elevator
trim go to the opposite direction. While it is off, unlock
Gene Buckle wrote:
Jorge Van Hemelryck wrote:
Very good idea ! As it's one of the planes I fly, I might get hold of some
data too, and perform a few tests in flight...
Are you sure your passengers are going to like it when you do some
flight tests?
If he flies for Aeroflot, they may not notice
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 10:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Gene Buckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If he flies for Aeroflot, they may not notice the
difference. *gdr*
You guys are scaring me. ;-)
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 10:27:39 -0700 (PDT)
Gene Buckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If he flies for Aeroflot, they may not notice the
difference. *gdr*
You guys are scaring me. ;-)
You've obviously never seen an Aeroflot flight before. :)
When they first started flying into KSEA in the
D Luff wrote:
On 6 Jun 2003 at 9:00, Norman Vine wrote:
Innis Cunningham writes:
So any windows people managed to fix this.
Does it mean also if the file can be textured it will show?.
I would love to add some buildings but untill we get this little problem
sorted it will be a
I once witnessed an Aeroflot jet on approach to KSEA that had an
alignment problem actually horse the jet into a 45 degree bank, haul it
about a quarter mile to the west to get on the right approach. Freaked me
out on the ground just watching it. I don't want to think about what
those poor
Actually, I've flown on Aeroflot on several occasions, including domestic
lines (Moscow-Novosibirsk), and the flight has always been OK. What I
would say is that these pilots probably have a lot of merit trying to fly
these aircraft when the company doesn't always have enough money for
decent
You know, many people get wrong ideas about test flights. Most of the
time, it's about keeping most parameters as stable as possible, while
watching and noting down the rest of them. The flights during which you
explore the corners of the flight envelope are not all that common. Or
it's just
This just happened twice:
... blah blah ...
cvs server: Updating Aircraft/UIUC/beech99-v1/doc
cvs server: Updating Aircraft/UIUC/fkdr1-v1-nl
cvs server: Updating Aircraft/UIUC/marchetti-v1
cvs server: Updating Aircraft/UIUC/ornithopter
Terminated with fatal signal 9
Re's .. WillyB
On Friday 06 June 2003 01:14 pm, Gene Buckle wrote:
Fortunately, he either noticed or was notified in time find the OTHER big
concrete bit he needed to land on.
Once or twice a year someone lands on the wrong
airport/runway/taxiway/concrete. What's most amazing is that this happens
even in
WillyB writes:
This just happened twice:
... blah blah ...
cvs server: Updating Aircraft/UIUC/beech99-v1/doc
cvs server: Updating Aircraft/UIUC/fkdr1-v1-nl
cvs server: Updating Aircraft/UIUC/marchetti-v1
cvs server: Updating Aircraft/UIUC/ornithopter
Terminated with fatal signal 9
Just
Reminds me of my flight into Bologna last year in one of go's (now
Easyjet) latest 737-300s -- there was a period of about 10 minutes
when we never flew straight. But they eventually managed to get the
thing aligned, and we did fly the last couple miles in a straight
line...
Most likely the
This just happened twice:
... blah blah ...
cvs server: Updating Aircraft/UIUC/beech99-v1/doc
cvs server: Updating Aircraft/UIUC/fkdr1-v1-nl
cvs server: Updating Aircraft/UIUC/marchetti-v1
cvs server: Updating Aircraft/UIUC/ornithopter
Terminated with fatal signal 9
Just
Major A writes:
You could tell the crew wasn't the most experienced in the world from
the amateurish announcements of the captain, BTW.
On my last flight from LA to MSP the pilot announced that the flight
would take 1 hour and 14 minutes (normally a 3.5 hour flight.)
I thought to myself, uh
Same for me, is there some way to recover from that, other than by
deleting the UIUC directory ?
--
Jorge Van Hemelryck
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Last thing on the cockpit voice recorder:
Captain: oh look, my gyro has tumbled.
CoPilot: look, my gyro has tumbled too.
Or the ever popular:
Hey, watch this!
Last thing on the A320's CVR: Hey, what's this bloody plane doing
again?
Andras
My wife and I were flying Vangaurd airlines (now defunct?) into Kansas
city (on a 737) a couple years ago and on *very short* final the pilot
made us all temporarily weightless to get back down on the glide slope
quickly. Recent x-rays show that my wife's fingernails are still
embeded into
I'm moving cvs over to the faster server ... you may experience some
temparary outages during the transition, please be patiet!
Thanks,
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson IVLab / HumanFIRST Program FlightGear Project
Twin Citiescurt 'at' me.umn.edu curt 'at' flightgear.org
Minnesota
Curtis L. Olson writes:
I'm moving cvs over to the faster server ... you may experience some
temparary outages during the transition, please be patiet!
Ok, cvs should now be moved over to the faster/bigger server. You
shouldn't hopefully see any differences (other than hopefully a
possible
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 21:16:25 +0100,
Major A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My wife and I were flying Vangaurd airlines (now defunct?) into
Kansas city (on a 737) a couple years ago and on *very short* final
the pilot made us all temporarily weightless to get back
Nice to see the 0.92 release made it on to flightsim.com quickly.
Although it's dominated by FS2002, any publicity is good publicity as
they say.
Regards,
Matt.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Saturday, June 7, 2003, at 12:45 am, matthew Law wrote:
Nice to see the 0.92 release made it on to flightsim.com quickly.
Although it's dominated by FS2002, any publicity is good publicity as
they say.
Though this is a slippery slope, what about avsim.com? (Which I
consider to be marginally
The cvs server move seemed to fix it here.
No problems this last time I updated.
Thanks Curt
Re's
WillyB
On Friday 06 June 2003 12:01, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
WillyB writes:
This just happened twice:
... blah blah ...
cvs server: Updating Aircraft/UIUC/beech99-v1/doc
cvs server:
On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 01:29:56 +0200,
Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2003 21:16:25 +0100,
Major A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My wife and I were flying Vangaurd airlines (now defunct?) into
Kansas city (on
Hi All
I have downloaded a 737-300 model EX FS98 and have got it to show thanks to
David Megginson and Wolfram Kuss's wise words.
Has some got a model about ready if not do you want this one when I get it
Teaked.
Also if there are people here who are working on FDM's for other A/C types
that
Michael Selig [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have tried essentially what you mentioned. Here's specifically what I
used in the uiuc-set.xml file:
view n=2
config
eye-heading-deg-path/orientation/gamma-horiz-deg/eye-heading-deg-path
/config
/view
The outcome is that this
At 6/7/03, Jim Wilson wrote:
Michael Selig [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I have tried essentially what you mentioned. Here's specifically what I
used in the uiuc-set.xml file:
view n=2
config
eye-heading-deg-path/orientation/gamma-horiz-deg/eye-heading-deg-path
/config
/view
The
71 matches
Mail list logo
