Jonathan Adam Muse wrote:
Hello Everyone,
I'm an aerospace engineering student looking to use flightgear as an
image generator for my generic flight dynamics model project. I'm
starting to get decent at programming but some of these flightgear
errors are above me. Is there anyone out
Maik Justus wrote:
Hello Fred,
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Hi,
There is a bug ( at least for me with MSVC ) in Rotor.cpp related with
the
usage of the % operator. In MSVC -1 % 4 == -1 not 3,
oh, good to know!
Could it be corrected before the release ( patch below ) ?
Thanks
-Fred
On Mon, Oct 13, 2003 at 07:50:50PM +0200, Maik Justus wrote:
In the next days I will try to optimize the settings for the bo105 and
to write a file similar to the Jet Ranger (not the 3D, just the flight
model),
I'll start a Jet Ranger 3D model as soon as the bo105 is acceptable. I'm
not
Hi,
I made a CVS update and now, with the A320, I am not able
to increase power to take of. The engines are desesperately
at the idle power ( N1=30 N2=60 ) while moving my joystick
throttle.
This is with a modified -set file where I implemented the
starting sequence ( engines not running at
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Hi,
I made a CVS update and now, with the A320, I am not able
to increase power to take of. The engines are desesperately
at the idle power ( N1=30 N2=60 ) while moving my joystick
throttle.
This is with a modified -set file where I implemented the
starting
Jon Stockill writes:
Actually it really helps getting your head around all the engine controls
to do in-air starts. If you're feeling particularly sadistic don't bother
setting vc either.
That's our being-dropped-from-a-giant-helicopter simulation.
All the best,
David
Jonathan Polley [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I just did a computer upgrade and I am trying to better understand its
capabilities, WRT FlightGear. To do this, I am curious as to the frame
rates that people are seeing with buildings turned ON. Here is my
.frgsrc (and FlightGear is build single
Actually, it is the buildings that cause a MAJOR throughput hit. Does
anyone know how to turn them off (disabling random objects does not
disable buildings)?
If I use [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a benchmark, the new machine is about 3x faster
than the old one. This is a G5 PowerMac with a Radeon
Jonathan Polley wrote:
Actually, it is the buildings that cause a MAJOR throughput hit. Does
anyone know how to turn them off (disabling random objects does not
disable buildings)?
You can tweak the following properties in preferences.xml :
/sim/rendering/static-lod/detailed
James Turner wrote:
Here's a patch to locate the base package inside the application bundle
on OS-X. The patch also disables the CPSForeground hack in boostrap.cxx,
which is unnecessary if the we're running as a proper bundle rather than
a Unix command line program.
Both of these changes are
Fred,
That does help my frame rates (the worst case rate went from 8FPS
to 14), but I still have the structures being drawn. What I would like
is something like --disable-structures (I looked and couldn't find one).
Jonathan Polley
p.s., I also had to set the LOD to be tiny (detailed=15,
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Here they are !
The installable package ( 80Mb ) :
ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Win32/fgfs-win32-msvc-full-0.9.3-pre1b.exe
I managed to build the excellent Bernie Bright's fgrun program
and I added it to a new (80Mb) package that I am uploading right
now.
I had to re-login to my old machine to finish transferring some files. Here are the
frame rates that the old Mac was giving (it is a single processor G4 running at 867
MHz, with 1 GB RAM, GeForce3 with 64 MB RAM).
On tarmac = 8 FPS (compared to 20 with the new machine)
Flying at the end of the
Dave Perry wrote:
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Here they are !
The installable package ( 80Mb ) :
ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Win32/fgfs-win32-msvc-full-0.9.3-p
re1b.exe
I managed to build the excellent Bernie Bright's fgrun program
and I added it to a new (80Mb) package that I
Dave Perry wrote:
Feedback:
1. The launcher is great!!! Thanks Bernie!
2. I noticed that there are no lights at all away from airports.
3. I also noticed that the Maintenance building to the right of 28R at
KSFO and Candelstick park are both white with no textures. Is this a
Windows issue
Jonathan Polley wrote:
I had to re-login to my old machine to finish transferring some files.
Here are the frame rates that the old Mac was giving (it is a single
processor G4 running at 867 MHz, with 1 GB RAM, GeForce3 with 64 MB RAM).
On tarmac = 8 FPS (compared to 20 with the new machine)
Fred,
I just ran FlightGear on my PC (built with cygwin under Windows)
and got some numbers similar to yours (I was running at 800x600 window
size). That leads me to ask for some clarification, when I say
buildings, I mean this (http://homepage.mac.com/eq_fidget/mac_fgfs.jpg)
and not
17 matches
Mail list logo
