Durk Talsma wrote:
- FlightGear runs fine now, but I seem to have some problems with my
joystick
configuration (CH yoke and pedals, both USB), specifically the POV-HAT,
keeps
spinning in circles. All the other buttons and axes seem to be working
fine
on both the yoke and pedals. Has anybody
Jim Wilson writes:
What we need is something that looks ahead and makes adjustments based on
future error in order to avoid overruns due to the momentum of the aircraft.
http://baron.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2003-July/018510.html
http://autopilot.sourceforge.net/kalman.html
Straight out of the manual:
---
Special VFR allows the relaxation by ATC, in certain circumstances, of some
restrictions to facilitate the operation of a flight without lowering the flight
safety to an unacceptable level. SVFR is usually applied by ATC in Class D or E
Control Zones, when
IIRC, someone had come up with a way to display various properties on the
HUD or instrument panel or something for debugging purposes. What was that?
Take a look at Aircraft/T38/Instruments/aero.xml
There's a more general way to do it, using static text for the field names.
I'll make one
Take a look at Aircraft/T38/Instruments/aero.xml
There's a more general way to do it, using static text for the
field names. I'll make one now.
Dave
I'll want to try and make one for the prop aircraft so I can test the drag
of the prop.
Jon
Matthew Law wrote:
The bottom line is it isn't just for getting in and out below minimums.
It is a required clearance before you will even be allowed into your
destination if it lies within a class D or E CTR.
From what you posted, UK SVFR sounded like the same thing we have in North
America
Jon
In file included from SkyRenderableInstance.hpp:27,
from SkySceneManager.hpp:38,
from SkySceneManager.cpp:29:
mat33.hpp:60: warning: friend declaration `Vec3Type operator*(const
Vec3Type, const Mat33Type)' declares a non-template function
In fact
Stroustrup C.13.2
I think this is rather appropriate...the examples even about matrix and
vector multiplication
Chris
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Starting to feel quite out of it now... there is NO typo.
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 14:47, Christopher S Horler wrote:
In fact
Stroustrup C.13.2
I think this is rather appropriate...the examples even about matrix and
vector multiplication
Chris
On Sat, 2004-02-07 at 14:47, Christopher S Horler wrote:
In fact
Stroustrup C.13.2
I think this is rather appropriate...the examples even about matrix and
vector multiplication
Bad style replying to myself, before anyone points out the missing
punctuation.
I also think there's a typo
Norman Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jim Wilson writes:
What we need is something that looks ahead and makes adjustments based on
future error in order to avoid overruns due to the momentum of the aircraft.
http://baron.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2003-July/018510.html
Jim Wilson writes:
What we need is something that looks ahead and makes adjustments based on
future error in order to avoid overruns due to the momentum of the aircraft.
this is one approach using the Kalman filter
http://icat-server.mit.edu/Library/Download/102_ICAT-99-5.pdf
Perhaps this was mentioned already, but I believe in the US in order to
request an SVFR clearance at night you also have to be instrument rated
and the plane must be equipped for IFR flight. I don't recall whether
you have to be IFR current or not though. Sounds like you were fine in
this
Norman Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jim Wilson writes:
What we need is something that looks ahead and makes adjustments based on
future error in order to avoid overruns due to the momentum of the
aircraft.
this is one approach using the Kalman filter
Jim Wilson writes:
Norman Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jim Wilson writes:
What we need is something that looks ahead and makes adjustments based on
future error in order to avoid overruns due to the momentum of the
aircraft.
this is one approach using the
Norman Vine [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Read the whole thesis disregarding the GPS correction stuff :-)
He develops a simgle antenna GPS assisted Kalman based autopilot
This is *very* similar to FGFS in that the position reported by the FDM
is ~identical to a 'corrected' GPS signal
Yeah
Put onto the FGFS list in case east coast FGFS people are interested.
Subject: [Fwd: Planning Community Based FOSS Event in NYC]
From: Joe Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Events NA list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 07 Feb 2004 13:05:02 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
17 matches
Mail list logo
