Eric L Hathaway wrote:
I'll reply to my own message to point out that my problem with
FlightGear's joystick handling in Linux is not unique: Roy Vegard
Ovesen noted the same root cause of this problem a few weeks ago in a
posting to this list:
Eric L Hathaway wrote:
The attached patch modifies the JSBSim config file for the f15.
Hey thanks! I haven't looked at the F-15 model for ages. The model
itself should be pretty accurate (given the data and the source of the
data) but if you want to improve it, please go ahead.
I have dreams of
Erik Hofman wrote:
Eric L Hathaway wrote:
I'll reply to my own message to point out that my problem with
FlightGear's joystick handling in Linux is not unique: Roy Vegard
Ovesen noted the same root cause of this problem a few weeks ago in a
posting to this list:
On Monday 18 October 2004 00:24, Vivian Meazza wrote:
The ability to set a serviceability state for each submodel system would
seem to be the correct approach, but if I understand your proposal
correctly, it will end up in more files overall.
Actually the systems and instrumentation
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
A quick grep through the base package revealed that three aircraft use the
subsystem: F16, Spitfire and Hunter. I will of course move the subsystem
config to system config so that they don't get broken.
I have used the F-16 mostly as a demonstrator. I wouldn't mind much
Vegard Ovesen wrote:
Sent: 18 October 2004 09:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Submodels
On Monday 18 October 2004 00:24, Vivian Meazza wrote:
The ability to set a serviceability state for each submodel system would
seem to be the correct approach, but if I
- Original Message -
From: Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2004 4:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] VBOs - performance test results
James Turner a écrit :
On 17 Oct 2004, at 10:15, Erik
Roman Grigoriev wrote:
Frederic! I must admit that you are absolutly right with Dlists I got 107
fps and only 78 fps w/ VBO on 5950Ultra
It's w/o shaders. I make additional test And tell results with shaders.
Do you have a figure without VBOs ?
-Fred
Eric L Hathaway wrote:
The attached patch modifies the JSBSim config file for the f15.
Hey thanks! I haven't looked at the F-15 model for ages. The model
itself should be pretty accurate (given the data and the source of the
data) but if you want to improve it, please go ahead.
I have
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Vegard Ovesen wrote:
Sent: 18 October 2004 09:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Submodels
On Monday 18 October 2004 00:24, Vivian Meazza wrote:
The ability to set a serviceability state for each submodel system would
seem to be the correct
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Roy, Dave, Vivian, Erik
One thing that is not clear to me, is what happens with the submodel
stuff in a multi-display environment? Is there any facility for
replicating and syncing these objects across multiple visual channels?
Not yet, but I haven't forgotten about it.
Curt asked:
Sent: 18 October 2004 15:47
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Submodels
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Vegard Ovesen wrote:
Sent: 18 October 2004 09:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Submodels
On Monday 18 October
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Sent: 18 October 2004 09:19
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Linux joystick problem following
recentplib js updates
Erik Hofman wrote:
Eric L Hathaway wrote:
I'll reply to my own message to point out that my problem
Selon Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Sent: 18 October 2004 09:19
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Linux joystick problem following
recentplib js updates
Erik Hofman wrote:
Eric L Hathaway wrote:
I'll reply
Hi,
On Donnerstag 14 Oktober 2004 17:59, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Mathias Fröhlich wrote a long time ago:
... sadly yes.
In the next couple of days or so I will have completed a model of a Seafire
IIIc. It has a functioning hook, so I was set to wondering if there was any
progress on the
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Sent: 18 October 2004 18:59
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Linux joystick problem
followingrecentplib js updates
...snip...
I've just got around to trying to compile plib-20041012-FG.tar.gz under
Cygwin; fell at the
Gene Buckle wrote:
Eric L Hathaway wrote:
I have dreams of someday trying to implement a reasonably accurate model
of the F-15's FCS, using information available on Gene Buckle's web
site, http://www.f15sim.com (look in the Operation section), and from
some NASA reports. If somebody is already
Hi,
Can anyone explain why the KR 87 adf was commented out of the radio
stack code? This one slipped under my radar screen until now. I have a
project and critical demo coming up that uses the kr 87 code and I'm
confused as to why it was commented out, and what all the motivations
and
I have dreams of someday trying to implement a reasonably accurate model
of the F-15's FCS, using information available on Gene Buckle's web
site, http://www.f15sim.com (look in the Operation section), and from
some NASA reports. If somebody is already working on this, I'd be
interested in
* Curtis L. Olson -- Monday 18 October 2004 21:35:
Can anyone explain why the KR 87 adf was commented out of the radio
stack code?
The kr87 was what we had through the years. A while ago David(?) created an
adf instrument (- Instrumentation/adf.cxx) that implemented the ndb search
and needle
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
The kr87 was what we had through the years. A while ago David(?) created an
adf instrument (- Instrumentation/adf.cxx) that implemented the ndb search
and needle positioning. This was then used by all(?) models. The kr87, however
did the same again *and* additionally the
* Curtis L. Olson -- Monday 18 October 2004 22:04:
Most likely the cause of the adf beeping was due to incorrectly defined
or nonexistant inputs for some of the controls.
Yes, that's right. Because the kr87 and the generic adf used different
property names. But the applied fix was the only
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
Sent: 18 October 2004 09:26
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Submodels
On Monday 18 October 2004 00:24, Vivian Meazza wrote:
The ability to set a serviceability state for each submodel system would
seem to be the correct approach, but if
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 00:10, Vivian Meazza wrote:
OK, I've just updated cvs, and the inputs to some of my 3d instruments are
now broken in the Hunter, Seahawk and Spitfire. How do I get them back?
What instruments are not working, and what inputs do they use?
I just tried the Hunter,
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 01:00, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
On Tuesday 19 October 2004 00:10, Vivian Meazza wrote:
OK, I've just updated cvs, and the inputs to some of my 3d instruments
are now broken in the Hunter, Seahawk and Spitfire. How do I get them
back?
What instruments are not
25 matches
Mail list logo
