On Montag 13 Juni 2005 11:03, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Probably a good idea. The old code is broken, unmaintained, and uses nasty
binary cloud definition files, while the new code yields much better
results (except when flying through clouds). The old code may be more
advanced in some respect
On June 6, 2005 06:44 pm, Josh Babcock wrote:
Well, take a look at what I put in, no wires, though I could do that
with about zero trouble if people think it would add to the model.
Personally I don't think it would add much though. Also I think the bar
I put in there is pretty sensible.
Now
Yeah... Also, the thing is I'm planning to create sceneries and
models for Hong Kong, and possibly some Taiwan and Sydney. I found
multimap pretty useful. I suppose I work on them based on FG's official
sceneries.
So, back to my original poblem, does anyone know what data is used
for
Gerard Robin wrote:
The new 3D clouds are a good exemple of programming ressource, which
could be used to simulate random waves ( i will get god lightnings or
rather devil fires, if i continu in that way ).
What I was referring to was moving masses of water. Simulating water
sparkles is
Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
So the last thing I remembered was that flying through clouds was much better
with the old code. The new clouds seem to be afraid from an aircraft. They
just move out of the flight path. As a result you almost never fly through
clouds.
Is this still the case?
Nope.
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
Water isn't the only other material that should be modelled. There are also
other materials such as grass and soil. Right now, I can take a short cut
across the grass in any airport without concern, and these sort of behaviours
should bring some consequences. =)
I have placed a compiled tarball of yesterdays OpenAL CVS files @
http://www.vso.cape.com/~nhv/files/cygwin/cyg_openAL.tgz
you might want to test these against the current FGFS before
blindly overwriting your currrent installation
Norman
___
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 10:13 +0200, Erik Hofman a crit :
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
Water isn't the only other material that should be modelled. There are
also
other materials such as grass and soil. Right now, I can take a short cut
across the grass in any airport without concern,
When the connection to Metar is unavailable (loop of requests on the
net), FG loads only after about 2 minutes.
Is it possible to reduce it.
It only happen with CVS release, 9-8 is good (no response, go on)
--
Gerard
___
Flightgear-devel mailing
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
Water isn't the only other material that should be modelled. There are also
other materials such as grass and soil. Right now, I can take a short cut
across the grass in any airport without concern, and these sort of behaviours
should bring some consequences. =)
I have placed a compiled tarball of yesterdays OpenAL CVS files @
http://www.vso.cape.com/~nhv/files/cygwin/cyg_openAL.tgz
you might want to test these against the current FGFS before
blindly overwriting your currrent installation
Is this distribution modified for use with CygWin as
Gerard Robin wrote:
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 à 10:13 +0200, Erik Hofman a écrit :
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
Water isn't the only other material that should be modelled. There are also
other materials such as grass and soil. Right now, I can take a short cut
across the grass in any airport
Gerard Robin wrote:
When the connection to Metar is unavailable (loop of requests on the
net), FG loads only after about 2 minutes.
Is it possible to reduce it.
It only happen with CVS release, 9-8 is good (no response, go on)
I've looked at it very briefly the past week and couldn't find
Jon Berndt wrote:
I have placed a compiled tarball of yesterdays OpenAL CVS files @
http://www.vso.cape.com/~nhv/files/cygwin/cyg_openAL.tgz
you might want to test these against the current FGFS before
blindly overwriting your currrent installation
Is this distribution modified for use with
Vivan Meazza wrote (in a CVS checkin):
I've removed all the features that rely on the diff to YASim
that I posted recently, I don't expect any reaction from Andy
any time soon! I feel a bit inclined to remind him of his rant
against Cygwin recently. I'm willing to be favourably
surprised.
On Monday 13 Jun 2005 15:14, Vivian Meazza wrote:
There remains some more eye-candy to do: nav lights, beam approach marker
lamps, realistic rad and oil temperature readings etc. In the meantime I
would be grateful for any comments, not least that it all downloads and
installs correctly!
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 16:13 +0200, Erik Hofman a crit :
Gerard Robin wrote:
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 10:13 +0200, Erik Hofman a crit :
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
Water isn't the only other material that should be modelled. There are
also
other materials such as grass and soil. Right
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 16:14 +0200, Erik Hofman a crit :
Gerard Robin wrote:
When the connection to Metar is unavailable (loop of requests on the
net), FG loads only after about 2 minutes.
Is it possible to reduce it.
It only happen with CVS release, 9-8 is good (no response, go on)
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 00:42, Josh Babcock wrote:
OK, model's done, same address. Now I'm going to do the animation XML.
If I'm really cool I'll be able to make the wind ribbon look good.
Otherwise, just controls and control surfaces.
Also, I didn't know what the rudder pedals looked like, so
Gerard Robin wrote:
If you think some numbers are (way) off, please sent corrections to me.
Most numbers where rough estimates without any testing.
OK, don't you think it could be rather an open discussion?
It would, if the rest of us could test it, but at this point you seem to
be the
* Gerard Robin -- Tuesday 14 June 2005 18:16:
Gerard Robin wrote:
When the connection to Metar is unavailable (loop of requests on the
net), FG loads only after about 2 minutes.
i have tried directly the Metar command and i got immediately an answer
with the real Weather of the same
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 18:24 +0200, Erik Hofman a crit :
Gerard Robin wrote:
If you think some numbers are (way) off, please sent corrections to me.
Most numbers where rough estimates without any testing.
OK, don't you think it could be rather an open discussion?
It would, if the
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 18:24 +0200, Erik Hofman a crit :
Gerard Robin wrote:
If you think some numbers are (way) off, please sent corrections to me.
Most numbers where rough estimates without any testing.
OK, don't you think it could be rather an open discussion?
It would, if the
Steve Hosgood wrote:
On Sat, 2005-06-04 at 00:42, Josh Babcock wrote:
OK, model's done, same address. Now I'm going to do the animation XML.
If I'm really cool I'll be able to make the wind ribbon look good.
Otherwise, just controls and control surfaces.
Also, I didn't know what the rudder
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Gerard Robin -- Tuesday 14 June 2005 18:16:
Gerard Robin wrote:
When the connection to Metar is unavailable (loop of requests on the
net), FG loads only after about 2 minutes.
i have tried directly the Metar command and i got immediately an answer
with the real
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 19:17 +0200, Gerard Robin a crit :
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 18:24 +0200, Erik Hofman a crit :
Gerard Robin wrote:
If you think some numbers are (way) off, please sent corrections to me.
Most numbers where rough estimates without any testing.
OK, don't you
Aircraft Designers:
If you are an aircraft designer, especially one that maintains aircraft
outside of the FlightGear CVS system, please read this notice
carefully! Please feel free to ask questions if something here is not
100% clear.
I am about to commit round one of my electrical system
Gerard Robin wrote:
Sand MINE rolling-friction2.O/rolling-friction
bumpiness0.1/bumpiness
Sand FG rolling-friction0.1/rolling-friction
bumpiness0.1/bumpiness
That may make sense for a sea plane with floats, but it doesn't make
sense for an
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 03:50:18 +0200, Arnt wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 13:39:21 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2005 12:14:09 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..duh, you bought the Sullivan generator for $79! ;o)
http://www.sullivanproducts.com/GenesysContent.htm
Yes, I'm hoping I can rig up an onboard power system based on the
genesys. For what I'll be doing, batteries would work fine too, but I
thought it would be an
Jon Stockill wrote:
Gerard Robin wrote:
Sand MINE rolling-friction2.O/rolling-friction
bumpiness0.1/bumpiness
Sand FG rolling-friction0.1/rolling-friction
bumpiness0.1/bumpiness
That may make sense for a sea plane with floats, but it doesn't
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I was curious about the idea of removing the case from my Linksys WRT54G
wireless router and powering that by battery. Supposedly it's running
linux and is hackable, but I haven't played around with trying to hack
into it yet.
How much space do you actually have?
Jon Stockill wrote:
How much space do you actually have?
Would a nano-itx or even mini-itx board fit? With one of those you
could use a USB wireless interface, giving you flexibility to position
it for best signal (radome style bulge under the aircraft? :-)
Construction pictures here:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
anything. I'm just going to move forward slowly one step at a time and
ignore most of the bright ideas from the mailing list. :-)
Probably a wise move :-)
Jon
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Andy Ross wrote
Vivian Meazza wrote (in a CVS checkin):
I've removed all the features that rely on the diff to YASim
that I posted recently, I don't expect any reaction from Andy
any time soon! I feel a bit inclined to remind him of his rant
against Cygwin recently. I'm willing to be
AJ MacLeod wrote
On Monday 13 Jun 2005 15:14, Vivian Meazza wrote:
There remains some more eye-candy to do: nav lights, beam approach
marker
lamps, realistic rad and oil temperature readings etc. In the meantime I
would be grateful for any comments, not least that it all downloads and
On Tuesday 14 Jun 2005 22:57, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Is this in roll only? The ailerons are much more powerful, but also damped.
There shouldn't be any rapid movement in the ailerons, but the stick
reflects the input. Look at the ailerons in an external view - are they
jumping around too?
Yes
Jon Stockill wrote:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I was curious about the idea of removing the case from my Linksys
WRT54G wireless router and powering that by battery. Supposedly it's
running linux and is hackable, but I haven't played around with trying
to hack into it yet.
How much space do
I was looking at the gear jitter in the latest version of FlightGear with the
current C172
(JSBSim). I didn't notice much jitter at all - really very little. Is that
because winds
are off by default, now? Is there a particular setup where I can see it most
noticeably? I
have a possible fix that
Le mardi 14 juin 2005 20:25 -0500, Jon Berndt a crit :
I was looking at the gear jitter in the latest version of FlightGear with the
current C172
(JSBSim). I didn't notice much jitter at all - really very little. Is that
because winds
are off by default, now? Is there a particular setup
On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 13:40:23 -0500, Curtis wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..duh, you bought the Sullivan generator for $79! ;o)
http://www.sullivanproducts.com/GenesysContent.htm
Yes, I'm hoping I can rig up an onboard power system based on the
genesys. For
41 matches
Mail list logo
