David Megginson writes:
Norman Vine writes:
This should work fine, the only thing I am worried about is that it
seems as if every sub component of FGFS is passing a double dt in
both the initialization and the update function. Then locally
storing a double elapsed variable to
Norman Vine writes:
David Megginson writes:
Norman Vine writes:
This should work fine, the only thing I am worried about is that it
seems as if every sub component of FGFS is passing a double dt in
both the initialization and the update function. Then locally
storing a
Norman Vine writes:
Are you sure that's true?
Yes !
The event queue still needs to check every
event every iteration to see if anything is ready to run ...
Not if the event queue is ordered by next run time !
All you have todo is process those items whose time stamp
is less then
On Wed, 04 Jun 2003 12:33:30 -0500
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Norman Vine writes:
Are you sure that's true?
Yes !
The event queue still needs to check every
event every iteration to see if anything is ready to run ...
Not if the event queue is ordered by next
