Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas is unable to draw Airports and Runways

2005-07-26 Thread Erik Hofman
Gerard Robin wrote: It do not solve the Atlas problem. Only one way to run atlas map is to use the old Airports format data. Atlas is a very old program which is partly obsolete regarding FGFS. Well, If you want Atlas to work with the kates data you will need to fix it, don't you? I've

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas is unable to draw Airports and Runways

2005-07-26 Thread Gerard Robin
Le mardi 26 juillet 2005 à 09:46 +0200, Erik Hofman a écrit : Gerard Robin wrote: It do not solve the Atlas problem. Only one way to run atlas map is to use the old Airports format data. Atlas is a very old program which is partly obsolete regarding FGFS. Well, If you want Atlas to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas is unable to draw Airports and Runways

2005-07-26 Thread Roy Vegard Ovesen
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 00:02, Gerard Robin wrote: Le lundi 25 juillet 2005 à 09:38 +0200, Erik Hofman a écrit : Markus Morawitz wrote: Please can anyone help me by teaching me some history about the Airport and NavAids file formats. Where is the current file format being described?

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas is unable to draw Airports and Runways

2005-07-26 Thread Gerard Robin
Le mardi 26 juillet 2005 à 16:40 +0200, Roy Vegard Ovesen a écrit : On Tuesday 26 July 2005 00:02, Gerard Robin wrote: Le lundi 25 juillet 2005 à 09:38 +0200, Erik Hofman a écrit : Markus Morawitz wrote: Please can anyone help me by teaching me some history about the Airport and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas is unable to draw Airports and Runways

2005-07-26 Thread Jim Wilson
From: Roy Vegard Ovesen On Tuesday 26 July 2005 00:02, Gerard Robin wrote: Le lundi 25 juillet 2005 à 09:38 +0200, Erik Hofman a écrit : Markus Morawitz wrote: Please can anyone help me by teaching me some history about the Airport and NavAids file formats. Where is the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas is unable to draw Airports and Runways

2005-07-25 Thread Erik Hofman
Markus Morawitz wrote: Please can anyone help me by teaching me some history about the Airport and NavAids file formats. Where is the current file format being described? FlightGear started out by using a native file format for airport data but recently switched to the file format also used

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas is unable to draw Airports and Runways

2005-07-25 Thread Gerard Robin
Le lundi 25 juillet 2005 à 09:38 +0200, Erik Hofman a écrit : Markus Morawitz wrote: Please can anyone help me by teaching me some history about the Airport and NavAids file formats. Where is the current file format being described? FlightGear started out by using a native file format

[Flightgear-devel] Atlas is unable to draw Airports and Runways

2005-07-24 Thread Markus Morawitz
Hello, I was able to compile and run Atlas 0.2.2 and Flightgear 0.9.8 on my Mac OS X 10.4.2. But Atlas is unable to draw Airports and Runways. Atlas is able to open the Airport and Runway data file but the format Atlas applies to the file (apt.dat.gz) is different to the real file format found

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-02-18 Thread David Luff
On 12/02/2005 at 22:31 Hans-Georg Wunder wrote: One question I have: With the left key,I am able to move around on the map. But then I destroy the flight track. Is it a bug or just a missing feature ? A bit of both, I guess. It won't be fixed for this release, but it irritates me as well,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-02-18 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Dave, How about retrying to make a release ? -Fred ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d

[Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-02-12 Thread Hans-Georg Wunder
Hello David, I just compiled the new Atlas-version on my Linux-Box (Debian 3.1) and it works great. I have had no compile-problems and the maps are looking very nice. With the new version I am able to visit foreign airports without additionnel enroute and approach charts. Great. One question

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-02-05 Thread Lee Elliott
On Friday 04 February 2005 02:27, Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:11:52 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Lee Elliott wrote: I did start looking at it but it wasn't clear to me exactly what I had to download and compile. At some points it started to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-02-05 Thread Lee Elliott
On Thursday 03 February 2005 22:11, Martin Spott wrote: Lee Elliott wrote: I did start looking at it but it wasn't clear to me exactly what I had to download and compile. At some points it started to look as though I'd have to get the entire XF86 tree. Yes, X11 is actually an example

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-02-03 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:43:47 +, Lee wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Saturday 29 January 2005 14:39, Christian Mayer wrote: Lee Elliott schrieb: Hello Dave, I'm using an ATI 9200 vid card with ATI's drivers and I'm getting: ..tried DRI? I run my 9250 on it. (128 bit

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-02-03 Thread Lee Elliott
On Thursday 03 February 2005 16:31, Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 17:43:47 +, Lee wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Saturday 29 January 2005 14:39, Christian Mayer wrote: Lee Elliott schrieb: Hello Dave, I'm using an ATI 9200 vid card with ATI's drivers and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-02-03 Thread Martin Spott
Lee Elliott wrote: I did start looking at it but it wasn't clear to me exactly what I had to download and compile. At some points it started to look as though I'd have to get the entire XF86 tree. Yes, X11 is actually an example of a monolithic piece of software. But rebuilding X11 isn't

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-02-03 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 22:11:52 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Lee Elliott wrote: I did start looking at it but it wasn't clear to me exactly what I had to download and compile. At some points it started to look as though I'd have to get the entire XF86 tree.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-30 Thread Lee Elliott
On Saturday 29 January 2005 14:39, Christian Mayer wrote: Lee Elliott schrieb: Hello Dave, I'm using an ATI 9200 vid card with ATI's drivers and I'm getting: Seaching for extensions... GLX_SGIX_fbconfig: NO GLX_SGIX_pbuffer: NO One or more required extension(s) could not be

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-30 Thread Lee Elliott
On Saturday 29 January 2005 17:31, Jon Stockill wrote: Lee Elliott wrote: I was hoping to generate some 2048x2048 maps, to improve the roads railways and then intended to scale them down to a more usable size for use with Atlas. I'm just waiting for a bunch of 4096x4096 maps to generate

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-30 Thread Lee Elliott
On Saturday 29 January 2005 21:56, David Luff wrote: Lee Elliott writes: I'm using an ATI 9200 vid card with ATI's drivers and I'm getting: Seaching for extensions... GLX_SGIX_fbconfig: NO GLX_SGIX_pbuffer: NO One or more required extension(s) could not be found:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-29 Thread Robicd
A windows binary of the code a few weeks ago is here: ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Win32/atlas-win32-20050112.zip courtesy of Fred Bouvier. Hopefully he will produce a release binary as well. Oh! That's nice :-) Thank you Frederic, you are sooo great ! Downloaded right now ... I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-29 Thread Lee Elliott
On Friday 28 January 2005 13:16, David Luff wrote: Hi all, I've put a release candidate of Atlas-0.3 up at: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~eazdluf/Atlas-0.3.0-rc1.tar.gz If a few folk could take the time to download this and try it out that would be great. Changes in the last year or so:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-29 Thread Christian Mayer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Lee Elliott schrieb: Hello Dave, I'm using an ATI 9200 vid card with ATI's drivers and I'm getting: Seaching for extensions... GLX_SGIX_fbconfig: NO GLX_SGIX_pbuffer: NO One or more required extension(s) could not be found:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-29 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Robicd wrote : A windows binary of the code a few weeks ago is here: ftp://ftp.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Win32/atlas-win32-20050112.zip courtesy of Fred Bouvier. Hopefully he will produce a release binary as well. Oh! That's nice :-) Thank you Frederic, you are sooo great ! Downloaded

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-29 Thread Jon Stockill
Lee Elliott wrote: I was hoping to generate some 2048x2048 maps, to improve the roads railways and then intended to scale them down to a more usable size for use with Atlas. I'm just waiting for a bunch of 4096x4096 maps to generate before I feed them to mogrify. 2048x2048 still had a lot of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-29 Thread Stewart Andreason
Jon Stockill wrote: Lee Elliott wrote: I was hoping to generate some 2048x2048 maps, to improve the roads railways and then intended to scale them down to a more usable size for use with Atlas. I'm just waiting for a bunch of 4096x4096 maps to generate before I feed them to mogrify. 2048x2048

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-29 Thread David Luff
Lee Elliott writes: I'm using an ATI 9200 vid card with ATI's drivers and I'm getting: Seaching for extensions... GLX_SGIX_fbconfig: NO GLX_SGIX_pbuffer: NO One or more required extension(s) could not be found: GLX_SGIX_fbconfig GLX_SGIX_pbuffer Unable to continue in headless mode

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-29 Thread David Luff
David Luff writes: Lee Elliott writes: I'm using an ATI 9200 vid card with ATI's drivers and I'm getting: Seaching for extensions... GLX_SGIX_fbconfig: NO GLX_SGIX_pbuffer: NO One or more required extension(s) could not be found: GLX_SGIX_fbconfig GLX_SGIX_pbuffer

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-29 Thread Innis Cunningham
Hi Fred Thank you Fred for these. I don't thank you often enough for the windows binaries you provide for the windows community.They are probably as close as most windows users get to a CVS system. I think I would speek for the majority of windows users when I say that without these binaries I

[Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-28 Thread David Luff
Hi all, I've put a release candidate of Atlas-0.3 up at: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~eazdluf/Atlas-0.3.0-rc1.tar.gz If a few folk could take the time to download this and try it out that would be great. Changes in the last year or so: * Now reads FG-0.9.8 airport and navaid formats * Atlas

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-28 Thread Roberto Inzerillo
Hi all, I've put a release candidate of Atlas-0.3 up at: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~eazdluf/Atlas-0.3.0-rc1.tar.gz Do you think there will be some Win32 binary too? It would be very nice :-) I don't know if it's even possible (I didn't look into the code in order to determine if libraries

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-28 Thread David Luff
On 28/01/2005 at 15:34 Roberto Inzerillo wrote: Do you think there will be some Win32 binary too? It would be very nice :-) I don't know if it's even possible (I didn't look into the code in order to determine if libraries and the source itself is portable) but I really hope so. A windows

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-28 Thread Adam Dershowitz
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: flightgear-devel@flightgear.org Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate Hi all, I've put a release candidate of Atlas-0.3 up at: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~eazdluf/Atlas-0.3.0-rc1.tar.gz If a few folk could take the time to download this and try it out

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-28 Thread Jon Stockill
David Luff wrote: Hi all, I've put a release candidate of Atlas-0.3 up at: http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/~eazdluf/Atlas-0.3.0-rc1.tar.gz If a few folk could take the time to download this and try it out that would be great. It builds ok on Slackware Linux 10.0, --headless seems to work ok with Map

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-28 Thread David Luff
On 28/01/2005 at 09:15 Adam Dershowitz wrote: I have never tried to build Atlas before, but just tried with this release. I am working on a Mac and ./configure gives me the following errors: checking for pthread_exit in -lpthread... yes checking for glNewList in -lGLcore... no checking for

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-28 Thread David Luff
On 28/01/2005 at 17:55 Jon Stockill wrote: It builds ok on Slackware Linux 10.0, --headless seems to work ok with Map - I'm running it remotely at the moment. I'll test the Atlas app when I get home and it finishes building the maps. One thing it is showing up is quite a few missing scenery

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas release candidate

2005-01-28 Thread Stewart Andreason
Jon Stockill wrote: One thing it is showing up is quite a few missing scenery tiles in the 0.9.8 scenery. I noticed the missing tiles last week, but found they were introduced a while back, as they are also in scenery-0.9.5, (at least the 3 I managed to download last year) I've almost got all

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ATLAS ? (navaids *symbols* ?)

2004-09-29 Thread Jon Stockill
Boris Koenig wrote: Jon Stockill wrote: It's not feasible to dynamically modify the scenery (not in the short term anyway), yes, that's what I believe meanwhile, too however, creating a seperate scenery tree with just the airports in the Objects tree would achieve one of your goals - Right,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ATLAS ? (navaids *symbols* ?)

2004-09-25 Thread Boris Koenig
David Megginson wrote: On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 10:34:05 +0200, Boris Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have actually already looked for symbols online, but probably one would have to draw new ones, in order to be able to release them under the GPL - vector images would be also neat, so that they can

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ATLAS ? (navaids *symbols* ?)

2004-09-25 Thread robert
Quoting Boris Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2. put models of the actual navaid transmitters in the scenery. For what purpose ? :-) Do you mean to improve situational awareness, so that a 3D model of a VORTAC is displayed, including the current bearing within the outside view window ?

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ATLAS ? (navaids *symbols* ?)

2004-09-25 Thread Chris Metzler
On Sat, 25 Sep 2004 14:18:20 +0200 Boris Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This might be worthwile to consider for the Atlas developers: they would merely have to use FlightGear's navaids database and fetch the positions of navaids, and OPTIONALLY display their symbols at the corresponding

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ATLAS ? (navaids *symbols* ?)

2004-09-25 Thread Boris Koenig
Hey Robert: are you back ? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Quoting Boris Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED]: 2. put models of the actual navaid transmitters in the scenery. For what purpose ? :-) Do you mean to improve situational awareness, so that a 3D model of a VORTAC is displayed, including the current

[Flightgear-devel] Atlas CVS: fails to render 1024x1024 png maps

2004-05-20 Thread Chris Metzler
Hi. I should probably be asking this in atlas-devel, but at first glance it looks pretty dead there; and I'm guessing someone here has encountered this, or can easily. I recently built Atlas from CVS (that took some work, but that's a different conversation). I then set about generating maps,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas CVS: fails to render 1024x1024 png maps

2004-05-20 Thread Lee Elliott
On Thursday 20 May 2004 08:43, Chris Metzler wrote: Hi. I should probably be asking this in atlas-devel, but at first glance it looks pretty dead there; and I'm guessing someone here has encountered this, or can easily. I recently built Atlas from CVS (that took some work, but that's a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas CVS: fails to render 1024x1024 png maps

2004-05-20 Thread Chris Metzler
On Thu, 20 May 2004 19:54:51 +0100 Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 20 May 2004 08:43, Chris Metzler wrote: So it seems that 1024x1024 files are the problem. Does anyone else see this with a current Atlas from CVS? Any suggestions on what I can do to fix this? Obviously

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas and recent rework of Airports

2003-09-24 Thread Erik Hofman
Dave Perry wrote: The recent changes from default.apt.gz to basic.dat.gz and runways.dat.gz breaks the use of Atlas. Even the CVS Atlas is still looking for default.apt.gz. Will we try to update Atlas before the FG9.3 release? I don't think we should delay the release because of Atlas since

[Flightgear-devel] Atlas and recent rework of Airports

2003-09-23 Thread Dave Perry
The recent changes from default.apt.gz to basic.dat.gz and runways.dat.gz breaks the use of Atlas. Even the CVS Atlas is still looking for default.apt.gz. Will we try to update Atlas before the FG9.3 release? Dave ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas and recent rework of Airports

2003-09-23 Thread Lee Elliott
On Wednesday 24 September 2003 02:13, Dave Perry wrote: The recent changes from default.apt.gz to basic.dat.gz and runways.dat.gz breaks the use of Atlas. Even the CVS Atlas is still looking for default.apt.gz. Will we try to update Atlas before the FG9.3 release? Dave I noticed this

[Flightgear-devel] Atlas

2003-07-10 Thread Christopher S Horler
I would like to try atlas, do I need to give flightgear any specific configure options (or anything else associated to fgfs). Chris ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] atlas binary

2002-07-10 Thread Darren Hammond
Jim This is a fairly old one - the file date is 26 Feb this year. I think it was compiled on RH7.2 before I upgraded the box to RH7.3. It still works for me. Darren attachment sent to Jim off-list On Wednesday 10 Jul 2002 5:03 am, Jim Wilson wrote: Got my new machine pretty much the way I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] atlas binary

2002-07-10 Thread Olivier Grisel
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Jim Wilson wrote: Got my new machine pretty much the way I want it...but rebuilding atlas is one of those little things that are left. It looks like there's some issues with Atlas and simgear that haven't been fixed in CVS yet (well as far as I've looked). Anyone have

Re: [Flightgear-devel] atlas binary

2002-07-10 Thread Jim Wilson
Works great! Thank you very much :-) Best, Jim Darren Hammond [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Jim This is a fairly old one - the file date is 26 Feb this year. I think it was compiled on RH7.2 before I upgraded the box to RH7.3. It still works for me. Darren attachment sent to Jim

Re: [Flightgear-devel] atlas binary

2002-07-10 Thread Jim Wilson
Olivier Grisel [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I used fg's autogen.sh to build it as mentionned in Atlas mailing list. Yes, I tried that and it didn't work. Then I messed around a bit and got a configure to run, and ran into build problems. Think I fixed one and then got another error, at which

Re: [Flightgear-devel] atlas binary

2002-07-10 Thread Olivier Grisel
I also needed to do : 'mv acsite.m4 acinclude.m4' as mentionned on the post : http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/8316/2002/5/0/8733592/ Hope this can help. Best -- Champi (03) Olivier Grisel *** Paix, Amour, Liberté et Fleurs. ***

Re: [Flightgear-devel] atlas binary

2002-07-10 Thread Jim Wilson
Olivier Grisel [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I also needed to do : 'mv acsite.m4 acinclude.m4' as mentionned on the post : http://www.geocrawler.com/archives/3/8316/2002/5/0/8733592/ Hope this can help. Yes it did. Not sure just what I did now, but that did the trick. Thanks, Jim

[Flightgear-devel] atlas binary

2002-07-09 Thread Jim Wilson
Got my new machine pretty much the way I want it...but rebuilding atlas is one of those little things that are left. It looks like there's some issues with Atlas and simgear that haven't been fixed in CVS yet (well as far as I've looked). Anyone have a working Atlas binary that will probably

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas source requires modification in the Makefilewrt sg libraries.

2001-11-28 Thread Curtis L. Olson
Ross Golder writes: On Tue, 2001-11-27 at 17:20, Alex Perry wrote: Well, I always do an automake and autoconf before the configure, so maybe the versions of the Makefile.in that are provided in the cvs tree are old ? Surely they should be removed from the CVS tree! Yes, surely, but

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas source requires modification in the Makefile wrt sg libraries.

2001-11-26 Thread Erik Hofman
C Hanish Menon wrote: Hi I also tried getting Atlas up and running on my debian machine. In the process I found that the Makefile requires to add some additional library files to get the program compiled on the linux machine. I tried informing the Atlas mailing list, but it requires

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Atlas source requires modification in the Makefilewrt sg libraries.

2001-11-26 Thread Alex Perry
I also tried getting Atlas up and running on my debian machine. The configure script should be checking for plib and simgear being present. In any case, atlas works fine with Debian; I'm using it under potato and woody. Although flightgear itself is packaged for Debian, I have no idea whether