On Thu, 2005-11-10 at 19:05, Dave Culp wrote:
Aside from the already mentioned glitch about the missing cloudlayers.xml
file, I was able to build 0.9.9-pre2 without any problems on my linux box.
I just moved on to 0.9.9.pre3
No (real) problems now.
Thanks to all who looked at my 'strace'
On Wed, 2005-11-09 at 19:46, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
FlightGear v0.9.9-pre2 (second prerelease for v0.9.9) is now available
for downloading and testing from the FlightGear web site
(http://www.flightgear.org)
It would be great if as many people as possible could download the
tarballs for
On Thursday 10 November 2005 17:02, Steve Hosgood wrote:
The latter few lines of strace fgfs look like this:
open(/usr/share/FlightGear/data/cloudlayers.xml, O_RDONLY) =
-1 ENOENT (No such file or directory)
I'm sure I saw an hour or so ago on this list that this file was mistakenly
Aside from the already mentioned glitch about the missing cloudlayers.xml
file, I was able to build 0.9.9-pre2 without any problems on my linux box. I
am getting some extraneous console output, which perhaps needs to be cleaned
up. (This is using the default log level, running the T-38 from
Steve Hosgood schrieb:
Seems like the program closes /usr/share/FlightGear/data/preferences.xml
and immediately crashes.
Hi Steve,
I had the same problem today after compiling new SimGear/FlightGear CVS.
Although I had downloaded FlightGear CVS data with cvs update -d -P I
got the message
FlightGear v0.9.9-pre2 (second prerelease for v0.9.9) is now available
for downloading and testing from the FlightGear web site
(http://www.flightgear.org)
It would be great if as many people as possible could download the
tarballs for this release and build and test it on as many platforms
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I am currently targeting the official v0.9.9 release for late next week
(time permitting.)
Is there any preferred version of OpenAL for this release? Just
wondering if there's a recommended version for linking against for the
binary packages.
Also, is there an fgrun
Jon Stockill wrote:
Is there any preferred version of OpenAL for this release?
The CVS from 1st April this year appears to be a good choice - BTW,
this is what FreeBSD folks decided to stick to ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends
A bit off topic: does anyone have success in compiling FlightGear and related
libaries using GCC-4.0?
I want to get my system sorted before I test the pre-release, but I might
ended up not being able to test FlightGear if GCC-4.0 has trouble compiling
FlightGear.
Ampere
On November 9, 2005 02:46 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
The more build errors and platform bugs we can catch now, the smoother
the v0.9.9 release will be for your favorite platform!
Well, I still can't get FlightGear to run under Xorg at 24bit depth. I am
still getting the following messages:
X
10 matches
Mail list logo
