Quoting Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
Thanks, glad to see you like it and it doesn't kill all the framerate.
For people that are not following CVS updates, check out :
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/sanfran.htm
The lights are brighter in FG than on
* Erik Hofman -- Friday 09 January 2004 11:24:
Modified Files:
baybridge-e-fb.ac baybridge-fb.ac baybridge-fb.xml ggb-fb.xml
Added Files:
light-pat-1.rgb
Log Message:
Frederic Bouvier:
here are some updates to the bridges :
- GoldenGate : alpha test added
- Bay Bridge west
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Erik Hofman -- Friday 09 January 2004 11:24:
Modified Files:
baybridge-e-fb.ac baybridge-fb.ac baybridge-fb.xml ggb-fb.xml
Added Files:
light-pat-1.rgb
Log Message:
Frederic Bouvier:
here are some updates to the bridges :
- GoldenGate : alpha test added
Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
Thanks, glad to see you like it and it doesn't kill all the framerate.
For people that are not following CVS updates, check out :
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/sanfran.htm
The lights are brighter in FG than on jpeg but you will have an idea.
That remind me that
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I'm waiting for the reflections of the bridge lights in the water. I
saw this in a commercial A320 sim once and it was a really neat effect.
I think the way the aircraft shadows are draw makes this possible. It
probably would look even better than the aircraft shadows
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
Thanks, glad to see you like it and it doesn't kill all the framerate.
For people that are not following CVS updates, check out :
http://perso.wanadoo.fr/frbouvi/flightsim/sanfran.htm
The lights are brighter in FG than on jpeg but you will