Andy Ross wrote:
This is still bad, though. One would expect a version 1.1 API to
remain backwards compatible with the 1.0 API.
Look at PLIB, FlightGear depends on it as well and their policy is not
that much different,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its
Andy Ross wrote:
Alex Romosan wrote:
Dave Culp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just curious ... Is there any reason why OpenAl doesn't offer stable
releases?
probably because it's still under development? on their web page
(openal.org) they say they are migrating to openal 1.1 specifications.
as
Andy Ross wrote:
This is still bad, though. One would expect a version 1.1 API to
remain backwards compatible with the 1.0 API.
Oh, and it's not all bad. They are finally making the API compatible for
all supported platforms. Right now it differs at some places ...
Erik
Dave Culp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just downloaded the latest OpenAL from CVS and can't get SimGear
to compile with it. Here's the error:
apply this patch
--- openal_test1.cxx30 Apr 2004 00:44:04 - 1.5
+++ openal_test1.cxx21 Jun 2005 23:03:38 -
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
int
I just downloaded the latest OpenAL from CVS and can't get SimGear
to compile with it. Here's the error:
apply this patch
--- openal_test1.cxx30 Apr 2004 00:44:04 - 1.5
...
Thanks Alex,
Just curious ... Is there any reason why OpenAl doesn't offer stable releases?
Dave
Dave Culp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just curious ... Is there any reason why OpenAl doesn't offer stable
releases?
probably because it's still under development? on their web page
(openal.org) they say they are migrating to openal 1.1 specifications.
as such i would expect some changes in the
Alex Romosan wrote:
Dave Culp [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just curious ... Is there any reason why OpenAl doesn't offer stable
releases?
probably because it's still under development? on their web page
(openal.org) they say they are migrating to openal 1.1 specifications.
as such i would
Andy Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe the best thing to do is just to remove this test application
from the source tree. Does the fgfs build still work?
i don't think i had any problems with the build. the cvs version has
this in AL/alctypes.h
#define ALC_MAJOR_VERSION
