Hi all
Several recent patches that were checked in with the following
log entry
This patch is there to correct a problem that prevent to load static objects when
specifying
a relative fg-root or a different, relative, fg-scenery.
It appears that there is a mix between fg-root, fg-scenery
Norman Vine wrote:
Several recent patches that were checked in with the following
log entry
This patch is there to correct a problem that prevent to load static objects when
specifying
a relative fg-root or a different, relative, fg-scenery.
It appears that there is a mix between
Frederic BOUVIER wrote:
Norman Vine wrote:
Several recent patches that were checked in with the following
log entry
This patch is there to correct a problem that prevent to load static objects when
specifying
a relative fg-root or a different, relative, fg-scenery.
It
Frederic BOUVIER writes:
Hmmm. I just redid some testing with a different current directory (c:/)
and an absolute FG_ROOT (d:/flightgear/cvs/fgfsbase) and I don't
see any problem.
Hmmm how are you launching FGFS
Can you tell me what is your exact test case ?
Sure - Here are pertinent
Norman Vine wrotes:
Frederic BOUVIER writes:
And a dumb question : have you updated and recompiled SimGear ?
I hope that 17-Sep-2003 7:11:50p is recent enough GMT +5
Hmm.. Checking simgear / scene / model / model.cxx
I see a minor differance then what is in the CVS
recompiling
Norman Vine wrote:
Norman Vine writes:
Frederic BOUVIER writes:
And a dumb question : have you updated and recompiled SimGear ?
I hope that 17-Sep-2003 7:11:50p is recent enough GMT +5
Hmm.. Checking simgear / scene / model / model.cxx
I see a minor difference then what is
Norman Vine wrote:
Norman Vine wrotes:
Frederic BOUVIER writes:
And a dumb question : have you updated and recompiled SimGear ?
I hope that 17-Sep-2003 7:11:50p is recent enough GMT +5
Hmm.. Checking simgear / scene / model / model.cxx
I see a minor differance then what is
