Re: [Flightgear-devel] SGPropertyListener (was Re: [Flightgear-flightmodel] crash reporting)

2003-12-20 Thread Erik Hofman
James Turner wrote: However, I think that large number of properties (all the JSBSim ones?) are of the 'bound' type, so quite a bit of polling would still occur (iff there's a listener on the property). I think the FDM trees could be marked non-polling upon creation. I don't see a way to use

[Flightgear-devel] SGPropertyListener (was Re: [Flightgear-flightmodel] crash reporting)

2003-12-19 Thread James Turner
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 19 Dec 2003, at 19:03, Andy Ross wrote: You would need to hook up the reset code as a command, so that Nasal and other bindings could see it. But it should work. One thing that isn't implemented yet is a SGPropertyListener interface that can be