Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:13:56 +0100
From: Lee Elliott
On Thursday 21 October 2004 22:47, Jon S Berndt wrote:
Would it be grumpy of me to suggest that we try a little
harder to trim quotes when replying with quotes? I've noticed
that there are several emails today with 100 to 200 lines
On Sat, 23 Oct 2004 18:46:38 +1000, Nick wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 22:13:56 +0100
From: Lee Elliott
On Thursday 21 October 2004 22:47, Jon S Berndt wrote:
Would it be grumpy of me to suggest that we try a little
harder to trim quotes when replying
On Thursday 21 October 2004 22:47, Jon S Berndt wrote:
Would it be grumpy of me to suggest that we try a little
harder to trim quotes when replying with quotes? I've noticed
that there are several emails today with 100 to 200 lines of
quoted material, followed by anywhere from a few lines to
Would it be grumpy of me to suggest that we try a little harder to
trim quotes when replying with quotes? I've noticed that there are
several emails today with 100 to 200 lines of quoted material,
followed by anywhere from a few lines to ten or so. Over time, this
stuff builds up...
Jon
Jon S Berndt wrote:
Would it be grumpy of me to suggest that we try a little harder to
trim quotes when replying with quotes? I've noticed that there are
several emails today with 100 to 200 lines of quoted material, followed
by anywhere from a few lines to ten or so. Over time, this stuff
Yeah I noticed that too - it makes for some hard reading.
Does this become a bandwidth issue on the mailing list server by any chance?
I've got a couple of basic rules that I try stick to.
Maybe they will help others a bit.
1. Try to only quote what the last guy said - remove all the 2nd hand
