On Wednesday 21 September 2005 19:54, Oliver Schroeder wrote:
The problem lies in XDR_encode_double() and XDR_decode_double(). Making all
arguments const did the trick. You can find my updated version here:
http://www.o-schroeder.de/fg_server/tinyxdr.tgz
please test it.
I can confirm that it
Oliver Schroeder wrote:
The problem lies in XDR_encode_double() and XDR_decode_double(). Making all
arguments const did the trick. You can find my updated version here:
http://www.o-schroeder.de/fg_server/tinyxdr.tgz
It's committed.
Erik
___
Erik Hofman
Oliver Schroeder wrote:
The problem lies in XDR_encode_double() and XDR_decode_double(). Making
all
arguments const did the trick. You can find my updated version here:
http://www.o-schroeder.de/fg_server/tinyxdr.tgz
It's committed.
Erik
That seems to break
Vivian Meazza wrote:
swap_test.cpp:12: error: invalid conversion from `uint32_t*' to `unsigned
int*'
Ok, this is fixed.
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
AJ MacLeod wrote:
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:57, Erik Hofman wrote:
Hmm, that should be correct.
What does the utility output if you include byteswap.h instead off our
own functions?
Swapping #include byteswap.h instead of tiny_xdr.hpp I get exactly the
same result here..
That's odd.
Erik Hofman wrote:
That's odd. This *should* indicate that it still would work with our own
definition of these functions ??!?
I've updated the code slightly to swap two 32-bit bytes on 32-bit
hardware. Could you test it again?
Erik
___
On Wednesday 21 September 2005 10:46, Erik Hofman wrote:
That's odd. This *should* indicate that it still would work with our own
definition of these functions ??!?
I should note here that I'm a really only a simple sysadmin and not a
programmer, so I'm saying nothing as to what should work
Sorry about that - I was too quick to test and didn't read the cvs log
carefully enough :-)
Here's the output of your swap test
UI32: (normal) 1234567
UI32: (swapped) 67452301
UI64: (normal) 123456789abcdef
UI64: (swapped) efcdab8967452301
AJ
___
AJ MacLeod wrote:
Certainly... Unfortunately it appears that the problem (for whatever reason)
is still there...
http://www.adeptopensource.co.uk/personal/fg/server_map_screenshot.png
Hmm, this looks like a signed/unsigned mismatch.
Erik
___
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005 13:21:27 +0200, Erik wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AJ MacLeod wrote:
Certainly... Unfortunately it appears that the problem (for
whatever reason) is still there...
http://www.adeptopensource.co.uk/personal/fg/server_map_screenshot.png
Hmm, this looks
Am Mittwoch 21 September 2005 10:23 schrieb Erik Hofman:
AJ MacLeod wrote:
Swapping #include byteswap.h instead of tiny_xdr.hpp I get exactly
the same result here..
That's odd. This *should* indicate that it still would work with our own
definition of these functions ??!?
I'm lost here
Hi Erik,
Erik Hofman wrote:
Secondly I've updated the code to use the ulEndianSwap() function
instead of defining our own (my system doesn't even define byteswap.h).
There's something really odd with byteswapping. Using your modified
version does not work. Using my own byteswap functions
Oliver Schroeder wrote:
There's something really odd with byteswapping. Using your modified
version does not work. Using my own byteswap functions does not work.
Using byteswap.h (ie. remove both bswap-functions and #include
byteswap.h instead) does work.
So far I did not find out what it is.
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 10:36, Erik Hofman wrote:
I've added a byte swap test utility in the MultiPlayer directory so you
can easily test if it really makes a difference. On my machine all
(should) work(s) fine.
Are you sure? It doesn't here since yesterday (Linux x86. ) FG runs OK, and
AJ MacLeod wrote:
The byte swap test utility you added today gives this;
UI32: (normal) ffaaccee
UI32: (swapped) eeccaaff
UI64: (normal) bbaaddffaaccee
UI64: (swapped) eeccaaffddaabb00
Hmm, that should be correct.
What does the utility output if you include byteswap.h instead off our
own
On Tuesday 20 September 2005 14:57, Erik Hofman wrote:
Hmm, that should be correct.
What does the utility output if you include byteswap.h instead off our
own functions?
Swapping #include byteswap.h instead of tiny_xdr.hpp I get exactly the
same result here..
AJ
Hi list.
I have prepared a new patch for multiplayer, which fixes endianess issues with
multiplayer code. It's basically identical to the patch I sent before my
vacation, but contains minor fixes.
Multiplayer should now be working under all unix-like environments and windows
native. The basic
Oliver Schroeder wrote:
Hi list.
I have prepared a new patch for multiplayer, which fixes endianess issues with
multiplayer code. It's basically identical to the patch I sent before my
vacation, but contains minor fixes.
Multiplayer should now be working under all unix-like environments and
18 matches
Mail list logo
