On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 20:24, David Culp wrote:
Matthew Johnson wrote:
Animal could be a Swallow...
African or European?
Errr..I don't know...
Matt
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Richard A Downing FBCS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since XML seems to come naturally to people around here, why not set up a
FlightGear-The-Book projectin a cvs repository? Then people can get html,
pdf and whatever else formats. Or you could use LaTeX.
The Getting Started manual is written in
Curtis L. Olson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you haven't taken a look at our installation and getting started
guide (available in the docs section of the web site) please have a
read through that. It addresses many items on your list given below.
Unfortunately, for personal reasons, Michael
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. We need people to go over paper lists and airport diagrams for
countries that don't publish air navigation data free online
(i.e. almost everyone but the U.S.) and fill in the blanks in our
navaid and airport databases.
Unfortunately this involves
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 09:25, Martin Spott wrote:
snip
p.s. Why isn't there an O'Reilly FlightGear book yet? What mascot
should they use?
Do we have a FlightGear icon for Windows-/KDE-/Gnome-Desktops ? ;-)
FlightGear icon...What would that look like, if I had the money a
competition
Matthew Johnson wrote:
Animal could be a Swallow...
African or European?
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
David Culp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Johnson wrote:
Animal could be a Swallow...
African or European?
As far as I know the European swallows stay in Africa during European winter
- did I mix up anything ? ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its
Martin Spott wrote:
David Culp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthew Johnson wrote:
Animal could be a Swallow...
African or European?
As far as I know the European swallows stay in Africa during European winter
- did I mix up anything ? ;-)
I think the correct answer was I don´t know
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 13:45:39 +1000
Tim Jelliffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Would all these need to be done in Blender? I had a go at using this
the other day, and quite frankly I found it very hard to use, even
after following a couple of the tutorials. Assuming that I can get the
Hi Tim I live in Perth WA.
As far as I understand all that is needed to put models in the sim is to
make the model in AC3D put it in the scenery folder that contains the tile
for the area the model belongs then modify the stg file for the area.
To get some idea how it works have a look in the
Hi David
David Megginson wrote
. We need people to start modelling identifiable human-made landmarks
like bridges, stadiums, and major buildings. Around the Bay area,
bridges are especially important (there's a sad, lonely gap between SF
and Marin Co. right now where the Golden Gate should be).
Richard A Downing FBCS writes:
There are two different motivations for writing OS software: (1)
'cos it's fun and you are interested and you want it for
yourself, and (2) 'cos there's a demand out there, and you can
satisfy it. Every OS hacker feels both motivations. But if (2)
is
David Megginson wrote:
p.s. Why isn't there an O'Reilly FlightGear book yet? What mascot
should they use?
I always thought FlightGear could need an owl with it's sharp vision.
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Innis Cunningham wrote :
Hi Tim I live in Perth WA.
As far as I understand all that is needed to put models in the sim is to
make the model in AC3D put it in the scenery folder that contains the tile
for the area the model belongs then modify the stg file for the area.
To get some idea how
Thanks for picking up on my joke about the O'Reilly book. The biggest
problem with serious documentation right now is that so much of
FlightGear is in a state of flux: even the mini-HOWTO's I've written
fall quickly out of date. I'm not saying that we shouldn't document,
but anyone working
David Megginson wrote:
Norman Vine writes:
FWIW - I like WIKIs for documentation in that they tend
to be updated more often as the efforts of ones work
is immediately accessable to all.
That's an outstanding idea. Can anyone set up a FlightGear doc WIKI?
We have a WIKI base, it's called
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your comments. You make some very good points.
Documenation is something that is hard work, but that we should all
strive to do a better job with it.
Being an open-source project, one of our big challenges is we don't
have any full time employees who we can dedicate
Erik Hofman writes:
BTW. I just learned what WIKI really is and think it is quite useful.
There is one drawback, it really needs active moderators to monitor
what happens to the docs. But that might be a minor drawback.
Moderators? Wiki's don't need no stinkin' moderators! If you don't
David Megginson wrote:
Erik Hofman writes:
BTW. I just learned what WIKI really is and think it is quite useful.
There is one drawback, it really needs active moderators to monitor
what happens to the docs. But that might be a minor drawback.
Moderators? Wiki's don't need no stinkin'
-devel] next volunteer
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your comments. You make some very good points.
Documenation is something that is hard work, but that we should all
strive to do a better job with it.
Being an open-source project, one of our big challenges is we don't
have any full time employees who we
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
p.s. Why isn't there an O'Reilly FlightGear book yet?
Because there isn't enough already-free-on-the-internet documentation to be
pirated for a book. :-)
What mascot should they use?
Bill Gates in a monkey suit?
Best,
Jim
Hi,
beside working on the flight school, I would also like to do some
coding for FlightGear (as long as my fiance lets me ;-)). Unfortunately
I am still a absolut beginner in coding. So I would like to start
working on some really(!!) easy stuff together with some very patient
person to help me.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
beside working on the flight school, I would also like to do some
coding for FlightGear (as long as my fiance lets me ;-)). Unfortunately
I am still a absolut beginner in coding. So I would like to start
working on some really(!!) easy stuff together with some very
It's starting to get problematic.
All entries in the help wanted list on the website look like they are
implemented more or less. We need to come up with some new goals.
Documentation. Step by step, newbie documentation. Including better and more
complete 'howto's' for building Aircraft,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi,
beside working on the flight school, I would also like to do some
coding for FlightGear (as long as my fiance lets me ;-)). Unfortunately
I am still a absolut beginner in coding. So I would like to start
working on some really(!!) easy stuff together with some
h, I do not know how difficult it would be, but I got some ideas:
- Flight-Management-System for B737 or B747 cockpits?
- Weather Radar
- Flight-planing GUI (select departure and arrival airport, waypoints,
aircraft, etc)
- Do we have outside lights for the aircrafts (Beacon, landing light,
Richard A Downing FBCS [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
It's starting to get problematic.
All entries in the help wanted list on the website look like they are
implemented more or less. We need to come up with some new goals.
Documentation. Step by step, newbie documentation. Including
On Tue 10. June 2003 14:04, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
beside working on the flight school, I would also like to do some
coding for FlightGear (as long as my fiance lets me ;-)). Unfortunately
I am still a absolut beginner in coding. So I would like to start
working on some
Martin Dressler wrote:
On Tue 10. June 2003 14:04, you wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
beside working on the flight school, I would also like to do some
coding for FlightGear (as long as my fiance lets me ;-)). Unfortunately
I am still a absolut beginner in
Martin Dressler wrote:
On Tue 10. June 2003 14:04, you wrote:
All entries in the help wanted list on the website look like they are
implemented more or less. We need to come up with some new goals.
No problems. But none of it looks like a easy stuf.
3d clouds - still not usable.
Support for
Erik Hofman writes:
It's starting to get problematic.
All entries in the help wanted list on the website look like they are
implemented more or less. We need to come up with some new goals.
We really could do with an awful lot of grunt work outside of the
FlightGear core:
1. We need
Hi,
Just read Davids post about volunteers making
models of buildings and things. Just something that occured to me the other day,
has anyone made an aircraft carrier model for flightgear yet? :)
I live in Sydney, Australia, and it would be great
to have a model of the Sydney Opera house
32 matches
Mail list logo
