Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..treat these fields the same way we treat the WTC Twin Towers,
axe'em down on 9/11/2001.
Hmmm, I sure any insenstivity here was not intentional
Insensitivity, or perhaps Tourett's Syndrome, which I've always suspected
anyway, and isn't his fault.
Dave
From: Dave Culp
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..treat these fields the same way we treat the WTC Twin Towers,
axe'em down on 9/11/2001.
Hmmm, I sure any insenstivity here was not intentional
Insensitivity, or perhaps Tourett's Syndrome, which I've always suspected
anyway, and isn't his
I was thinking of the way we could ommit lifetime for our terrain and
scenery objects. For e.g. if we get a WTC towers models or some other
historical buildings one day, we cannot place them into year 2003. What
if every object has a timestamp - an interval from when to when certain
object
by
textureTerrain/18th_century_city.rgb/texture in the
BuiltUpCover of the materials file which is located in the root of
the base package.
Hm... as mentioned before if I recall correctly, it would be cool to add
a time interval property for terrain objects (eg. WTC twin towers from
1979 to 2001
On Saturday, 20 December 2003 20:27, Matevz Jekovec wrote:
Hm... as mentioned before if I recall correctly, it would be cool to add
a time interval property for terrain objects (eg. WTC twin towers from
1979 to 2001)
While we're adding time properties to scenery models we need to add priority
Matevz Jekovec wrote:
Hm... as mentioned before if I recall correctly, it would be cool to add
a time interval property for terrain objects (eg. WTC twin towers from
1979 to 2001) and terrian itself (mesh (evolution of the Earth maybe?) +
textures (18th century pack)). When starting fgfs, you
to include
those! It's not *that* hard to rebuild a few tiles of custom scenery
oneself though.
..treat these fields the same way we treat the WTC Twin Towers,
axe'em down on 9/11/2001.
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his
Jim Wilson wrote:
From: Dave Culp
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..treat these fields the same way we treat the WTC Twin Towers,
axe'em down on 9/11/2001.
Hmmm, I sure any insenstivity here was not intentional
Insensitivity, or perhaps Tourett's Syndrome, which I've always suspected
anyway, and isn't
Matevz Jekovec wrote:
I was thinking of the way we could ommit lifetime for our terrain and
scenery objects. For e.g. if we get a WTC towers models or some other
historical buildings one day, we cannot place them into year 2003. What
if every object has a timestamp - an interval from when
On Wed, 11 May 2005 18:59:26 -0400, Josh wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jim Wilson wrote:
From: Dave Culp
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..treat these fields the same way we treat the WTC Twin
Towers, axe'em down on 9/11/2001.
Hmmm, I sure any insenstivity here
would rate a large
sized object with medium uniquenes of design higher.
Josh
Paul Surgeon wrote:
On Saturday, 20 December 2003 20:27, Matevz Jekovec wrote:
Hm... as mentioned before if I recall correctly, it would be cool to add
a time interval property for terrain objects (eg. WTC twin towers
think he'd want to include
those! It's not *that* hard to rebuild a few tiles of custom scenery
oneself though.
..treat these fields the same way we treat the WTC Twin Towers,
axe'em down on 9/11/2001.
Hmmm, I sure any insenstivity here was not intentional, but occasionally
it doesn't hurt
On Wed, 11 May 2005 14:09:20 -0500, Dave wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..treat these fields the same way we treat the WTC Twin Towers,
axe'em down on 9/11/2001.
Hmmm, I sure any insenstivity here was not intentional
..apologies, my point was we show
the same way we treat the WTC Twin Towers,
axe'em down on 9/11/2001.
Hmmm, I sure any insenstivity here was not intentional, but
occasionally it doesn't hurt to think before you speak. There have
been many far worse tragedies before 9/11 and after. Earthquakes,
tsunamis, wars
14 matches
Mail list logo
