Re: [Flightgear-devel] GPL licensing question.

2006-06-07 Thread Erik Hofman
Oliver wrote: But what about nasal script code in a xml file that is written from scratch but makes use of flightgear's nasal implementation? That should rise no problems, just as PHP and java scripts don't inherit the interpreters license. Erik -- http://www.ehtw.info (Dutch)Future

Re: [Flightgear-devel] panel/splash-screen/hud fonts

2006-06-07 Thread Erik Hofman
Melchior FRANZ wrote: I've now converted all font-using parts in fgfs to use the font-cache. And while I was at it, I also made some fonts configurable: Nice! Good work. Erik -- http://www.ehtw.info (Dutch)Future of Enschede Airport Twente http://www.ehofman.com/fgfs FlightGear

Re: [Flightgear-devel] GPL licensing question.

2006-06-07 Thread Erik Hofman
Mathias Fröhlich wrote: From my point of view that is the same with gcc. The compiler is GPL, but the programs compiled with gcc do not need to be gpl. The runtime libraries used by gcc compiled codes is a little less than LGPL. I think that you can do properitary aircraft with flightgear.

[Flightgear-devel] Sailing Ships and Submarines (was Re: Tides in FlightGear?)

2006-06-07 Thread Steve Hosgood
Oliver wrote: Maybe we could integrate code from the submarine simulation Danger of the Deep. They have allready very nice eye candy water effects. [...] If we think about this a little further perhaps they might be interested in a merge of both projects. Because even a submarine simulation

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Lee Elliot-ComperSwift

2006-06-07 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 01:26:22 -0400, Josh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Lee Elliott wrote: lowest I dared stall? Like he had a choice? ..or no chute? Or, not wanting to risk an unique plane? Could be fun modelling it to see how close we get to it. (Back to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Lee Elliot-ComperSwift

2006-06-07 Thread Martin Spott
Arnt, Arnt Karlsen wrote: (Back to http://80.239.32.252/terrorgear.configure.fails) Do you really think you're making new friends by hijacking every thread that comes by and posting your non-functional URL to each of them ? I heavily doubt, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Lee Elliot-ComperSwift

2006-06-07 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Wed, 7 Jun 2006 12:59:29 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Arnt, Arnt Karlsen wrote: (Back to http://80.239.32.252/terrorgear.configure.fails) ..fixed, thanks. Wifi link out was down 1300 thru 1500 UTC today. TerraGear build-terror remains unsolved, diagnosis

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Lee Elliot-ComperSwift

2006-06-07 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Quoting Arnt Karlsen: (Back to http://80.239.32.252/terrorgear.configure.fails) ..fixed, thanks. Wifi link out was down 1300 thru 1500 UTC today. TerraGear build-terror remains unsolved, diagnosis help needed. My isp's smtp box is down too, but that's no big deal, pop3 and webmail works

[Flightgear-devel] configurable HUD colors [breaks backward compatibility]

2006-06-07 Thread Melchior FRANZ
HUD colors are now configurable in preferences.xml. Aircraft can set different colors for /sim/hud/colors/color[*]/{red,green,blue}, or add more color groups (only considered at startup, runtime addition or removal are ignored). Colors can be changed at runtime, too, but this only takes effect if

Re: [Flightgear-devel] configurable HUD colors [breaks backward compatibility]

2006-06-07 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Wednesday 07 June 2006 20:09: Especially fighters with real HUD may want to adjust the day color. The default green is IMHO too saturated, and should be more white-ish. Just tried the f16-3d with these values: brightness=1.0 red=0.5 green=1.0 blue=0.7 ... which

Re: [Flightgear-devel] configurable HUD colors [breaks backward compatibility]

2006-06-07 Thread Erik Hofman
Melchior FRANZ wrote: Just tried the f16-3d with these values: brightness=1.0 red=0.5 green=1.0 blue=0.7 ... which looked quite nice. Brighter, and slightly blue-ish. But then again, I've never seen a real HUD in action. My experience is only from other sims, and my memory

Re: [Flightgear-devel] configurable HUD colors [breaks backward compatibility]

2006-06-07 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 07 June 2006 23:06: Melchior FRANZ wrote: Just tried the f16-3d with these values [...] which looked quite nice. If you wish to commit it, please go ahead. I can always tune it afterwards. OK, I did, but tuning that will indeed be recommendable. I've no idea how a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Lee Elliot-ComperSwift

2006-06-07 Thread Lee Elliott
On Wednesday 07 June 2006 13:35, Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 01:26:22 -0400, Josh wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Lee Elliott wrote: lowest I dared stall? Like he had a choice? ..or no chute? Or, not wanting to risk an unique plane? Could be fun modelling it to see how

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: data/Navaids nav.dat.gz, 1.4, 1.5

2006-06-07 Thread Martin Spott
David Megginson wrote: Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Navaids In directory baron:/tmp/cvs-serv15639 Modified Files: nav.dat.gz Log Message: Added missing Quebec localizers (no glidescope). Don't these navaids get supplied by Robin's database like the airports do ? I'm just