Re: [Flightgear-devel] Blackbird -SR71 A and B

2007-07-15 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* gh.robin -- Friday 13 July 2007: Here is a new version of SR71-BlackBird. Committed, thanks. (I picked up the newer version that you posted on the IRC channel.) m. - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download

Re: [Flightgear-devel] AI callsign

2007-07-15 Thread Durk Talsma
On Tuesday 10 July 2007 02:52, Csaba Halász wrote: Anyway, attached is a new version of the AI patch (for OSG branch) which also takes care of a little naming inconsistency involving Path vs. SMPath and some const issues. I've integrated this patch into a larger one, which I've just

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Chaos in FG development [was: Bomb patch for vulcanb2]

2007-07-15 Thread leee
On Saturday 14 July 2007 18:48, Melchior FRANZ wrote: * leee -- Saturday 14 July 2007: Perhaps FG has reached the point where it positively needs some sort of oversight management and planning, as seems to happen with many, if not most, large-scale Open-source projects e.g. Apache, Wine

[Flightgear-devel] 787 Revisions and Deletions

2007-07-15 Thread JOSHUA WILSON
I have made some further revisions to the liveries and huds. Also, 787-8-splash.rgb, 787-set.xml, Models/787.xml, Models/787co.rgb, Models/body.ac, Models/lights2.rgb, and Models/measure.ac should be removed. Josh- This

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Blackbird -SR71 A and B

2007-07-15 Thread Hans Ulrich Niedermann
AnMaster wrote: Mike Schuh wrote: How are FG aircraft connected to an aircraft carrier? Could the same technique be used for airborne carriers? Well for AI carriers that would work, note that there are no MP carriers. There lag would be an issue (as far as I understand it). Lag should

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OpenSceneGraph 2.0

2007-07-15 Thread Hans Ulrich Niedermann
Holger Wirtz wrote: I don't understand why there is this problem... is this a bug in the fglrx_dri.so? Why does fgfs worked until this problem occurs a month ago? I tried to use the ATI drivers from www.ati.com, but they have no DRI driver for Radeon X1400 Chips :-( fglrx *is* the driver

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 787 Revisions and Deletions

2007-07-15 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Sunday 15 July 2007: But there are problems with the 787: Some more: Nasal runtime error: nil used in numeric context at $FG_ROOT/Aircraft/787/Nasal/system.nas, line 193 Nasal runtime error: setprop() value is not string or number at

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Blackbird -SR71 A and B

2007-07-15 Thread gh.robin
On Sun 15 July 2007 14:53, Melchior FRANZ wrote: * gh.robin -- Friday 13 July 2007: Here is a new version of SR71-BlackBird. Committed, thanks. (I picked up the newer version that you posted on the IRC channel.) m. Melchior, thanks I did nor gave any diff files because of a lot of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 787 Revisions and Deletions

2007-07-15 Thread JOSHUA WILSON
... but forgot to mention a link ... :-) The 787 is really the only airliner to show off! All others have one or the other nice strong side (mostly nice 3D models), but none is as complete. I haven't yet commented on what the 0.9.11 release should contain, but for me the 787, the A-6E and the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Chaos in FG development [was: Bomb patch for vulcanb2]

2007-07-15 Thread Stefan Seifert
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 leee wrote: It is difficult to see a good answer to this issue. On the one hand, planning ahead and setting specific objectives for the FG developers to work towards would give known objectives and a clear development path but at the same

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Chaos in FG development [was: Bomb patch for vulcanb2]

2007-07-15 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Stefan Seifert -- Sunday 15 July 2007: The largest open source project with thousands of developers, namely the Linux kernel itself does not have the slightest idea of a road map, even though most of the developers are in fact paid to work on it. And it works pretty well. Exactly. I'm

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Blackbird -SR71 A and B

2007-07-15 Thread gh.robin
On Sun 15 July 2007 17:20, Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote: AnMaster wrote: Mike Schuh wrote: How are FG aircraft connected to an aircraft carrier? Could the same technique be used for airborne carriers? Well for AI carriers that would work, note that there are no MP carriers. There lag

[Flightgear-devel] MP 787 crashes FG on windows

2007-07-15 Thread Stuart Buchanan
Hi All, Just a quick note that I'm seeing crashes on HEAD under windows when another person joins MP using the 787. It's happened 3 times immediately after a 787 has joined the MP session, so I'm fairly sure it's not a coincidence. Unfortunately I haven't been able to build a debug image so I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Blackbird -SR71 A and B

2007-07-15 Thread Maik Justus
Hi, gh.robin schrieb am 15.07.2007 21:07: Yes and Lag is not a problem at all, because the problem is very simple. B52/X15 are first linked together , and only one pilot the B52 pilot is driving the other pilot (X15 pilot) is only an observer, in a passive mode. There is not any problem

[Flightgear-devel] Joystick conf help

2007-07-15 Thread Thiago Drechsel
Hi all. I'm having some problems with my new joystick. When I connect and test it with js_demo program, I can see that even with all axis and trims centered, js_demo tells me they are not. The output is below: # ./js_demo Joystick test program. ~~ Joystick 0: Padix Co. Ltd.

[Flightgear-devel] Weather interpolation patch

2007-07-15 Thread Stuart Buchanan
Hi All, Wind shear cause by METAR updates is a common problem in FG, especially around the San Francisco bay, where there are a large number of airports with METAR, and quite localized weather conditions. As a first attempt to solve this, I've made some simple changes to the environment

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Joystick conf help

2007-07-15 Thread Csaba Halász
On 7/15/07, Thiago Drechsel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all. I'm having some problems with my new joystick. When I connect and test it with js_demo program, I can see that even with all axis and trims centered, js_demo tells me they are not. The output is below: ... The question is: Is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Weather interpolation patch

2007-07-15 Thread Hans Fugal
I once went from reasonable headwind to strong crosswind during short final. It was quite exciting. I am in favor of interpolating weather changes, rather than the wall of weather. On 7/15/07, Stuart Buchanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All, Wind shear cause by METAR updates is a common

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Chaos in FG development [was: Bomb patch for vulcanb2]

2007-07-15 Thread Hans Fugal
On 7/15/07, Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Stefan Seifert -- Sunday 15 July 2007: The largest open source project with thousands of developers, namely the Linux kernel itself does not have the slightest idea of a road map, even though most of the developers are in fact paid to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Weather interpolation patch

2007-07-15 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
On July 15, 2007 07:27:48 pm Hans Fugal wrote: I once went from reasonable headwind to strong crosswind during short final. It was quite exciting. It is quite annoying. It pretty much defeats the purpose of following glideslope and locolizer. I am in favor of interpolating weather changes,