Yea not bad but still a little low-tech. What about such:
http://www.activision.com/index.html#home|de_DE
Click on images either for links for screenshots. Interesting also for the
future when we
hopefully have addons. So you could get an impression and then decide to visit
the link
or not.
Hi Curt
are you, or someone else, working on integrating the new apt.dat format as of
x-plane 9?
--- On Sat, 3/20/10, Curtis Olson curtol...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Curtis Olson curtol...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug: nav[12] selected radial
To: FlightGear developers
On Tuesday 23 March 2010 07:08:47 Michael Sgier wrote:
Yea not bad but still a little low-tech. What about such:
http://www.activision.com/index.html#home|de_DE
Click on images either for links for screenshots. Interesting also for the
future when we hopefully have addons. So you could
Csaba Halász wrote:
This fixes compilation error for non-bsd systems that happen to return
const char* from dlerror().
No reason not to, since const char* is assignable from char*.
It's committed, thanks.
Erik
--
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
visible. Now I think I managed to get it right with 3d objects. See :
http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgfs-city-relief-4.jpg
Even more impressive!
Erik
--
Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio
Erik Hofman wrote:
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
visible. Now I think I managed to get it right with 3d objects. See :
http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgfs-city-relief-4.jpg
Even more impressive!
There's just one thing, the wrong side of the buildings seem to be lit
with this update?
Erik
- Erik Hofman a écrit :
Erik Hofman wrote:
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
visible. Now I think I managed to get it right with 3d objects. See
:
http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgfs-city-relief-4.jpg
Even more impressive!
There's just one thing, the wrong side of the buildings seem to
Possibly its better and easier with a big servo motor setup but while
i have seen many posts in sim builder forums about testing different
types of motor, I have not seen an example of a motor that really fits
the bill.
Possibly we can compare notes on a separate email as this hardware
Back in the 60´s and 70´s we found that bungee rubber gave better feel than
steel springs when we made simple (i.e. non-hydraulic) feel units from time
to time for our research simulator.
I also built a few hydraulic systems, but these need lots of safety devices
to protect the pilot from
Looks fantastic!
David
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:22 AM, Erik Hofman e...@ehofman.com wrote:
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
visible. Now I think I managed to get it right with 3d objects. See :
http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgfs-city-relief-4.jpg
Even more impressive!
Erik
Ok Wille and Allan
For pix of works in progress, if you go to
http://www.bali-gold.com/Avionics/index.php
Then to the sim two directory, I have put in some new pix with
comments on them of the rudder setup and the unit i am building up
right now which will be for the ailerons.
This design is
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Michael Sgier wrote:
Hi Curt
are you, or someone else, working on integrating the new apt.dat format as
of x-plane 9?
A few of us have been in correspondence with Ben Supnik from time to time,
but as far as I know, no one within FlightGear has tackled the new
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Curtis Olson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Michael Sgier wrote:
Hi Curt
are you, or someone else, working on integrating the new apt.dat format as
of x-plane 9?
A few of us have been in correspondence with Ben Supnik from time to time,
but as far as I know,
* Curtis Olson -- Tuesday 23 March 2010:
A few of us have been in correspondence with Ben Supnik from time to time,
but as far as I know, no one within FlightGear has tackled the new x-plane 9
apt and navaid data formats.
The parts of the new format that I have designed (with some input from
Curtis Olson wrote:
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:15 AM, Michael Sgier wrote:
are you, or someone else, working on integrating the new apt.dat format as
of x-plane 9?
A few of us have been in correspondence with Ben Supnik from time to time,
but as far as I know, no one within FlightGear has
Gene Buckle wrote:
Is the 850 spec considered the new apt.dat format?
Yup, at least it's the most recent public spec. See:
http://data.x-plane.com/designers.html#Formats
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 10:03 -0700, cas...@mminternet.com wrote:
Hi,
Can anyone shed some light on the following question?
Does JSBSim calculate elevator position and control hinge moments based on
the general equation of motion, including inertial coupling, is described
by Etkin( 1982 ),
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 09:17 +0100, Erik Hofman wrote:
Michael Sgier wrote:
Yea not bad but still a little low-tech. What about such:
http://www.activision.com/index.html#home|de_DE
I hate websites that consists only of flash content.
In fact I've added a flash blocker because of that.
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Martin Spott wrote:
Gene Buckle wrote:
Is the 850 spec considered the new apt.dat format?
Yup, at least it's the most recent public spec. See:
http://data.x-plane.com/designers.html#Formats
Thanks Martin, that's what I thought.
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
I have to support Ron and others on this-- I much prefer usability and
speed of access over visual gimmicks, especially Flash-based content
navigation.
-Gary aka Buckaroo
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Ron Jensen w...@jentronics.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 09:17 +0100, Erik Hofman
In France we use SPIP a lot : http://www.spip.net/rubrique25.html
It a simple open source PHP/MySQL web publishing-focused CMS.
See http://www.spip.net/en_article2009.html for some web examples.
The fact is : the webmaster just has to know HTML/CSS + design, and integrate
the SPIP routines in
Ron Jensen wrote:
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 09:17 +0100, Erik Hofman wrote:
Michael Sgier wrote:
Yea not bad but still a little low-tech. What about such:
http://www.activision.com/index.html#home|de_DE
I hate websites that consists only of flash content.
In fact I've added a flash blocker
willie schrieb:
+1 to that, brother
There are many excellent sites out there using simple html and
intelligent CSS. I don't see why we can't be one of them. Keep it simple
and fast.
1+ to the whole usability and design consortium here.
When you read the whole thread you see that this is
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 19:20 +0100, HB-GRAL wrote:
willie schrieb:
+1 to that, brother
There are many excellent sites out there using simple html and
intelligent CSS. I don't see why we can't be one of them. Keep it simple
and fast.
1+ to the whole usability and design consortium
There does not seem any need to go totally Googly
when all that Pete has done can be done to the
current site, in an incremental page-by-page way...
Am I missing something here?
Can I clear something up here once and for all re the fg-www.appspot.com
site
1) The site is presently
Geoff McLane schrieb:
But his good work _IS_ being used, extensively -
1 left TOC
2 CSS design
3 XHTML 1.0
I have added a little more today...
http://geoffair.net/fg/site
including a bottom TOC - presently not quite the
same as the left, but it will be...
Geoff,
I am actually not
- Frederic Bouviera écrit :
- Erik Hofman a écrit :
Erik Hofman wrote:
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
visible. Now I think I managed to get it right with 3d objects.
See
:
http://frbouvi.free.fr/flightsim/fgfs-city-relief-4.jpg
Even more impressive!
There's just one
But his good work _IS_ being used, extensively -
1 left TOC
2 CSS design
3 XHTML 1.0
Can I suggest a way forward as we are probably replicating work...
1) create a branch of the cvs website in git. (maybe on gitorious/fg)
2) give commit rights to whoever gonna contribute
3) design the
28 matches
Mail list logo
