Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 61, Issue 12

2011-05-25 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote: I used it for the P-51D and found the system to be easy to use and it took all of perhaps 10 to 15 minutes to create ratings for the four areas that get scored and then create the entries in the *set.xml file. The system is easy to use and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 61, Issue 12

2011-05-25 Thread Stuart Buchanan
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:19 AM, I wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote: I used it for the P-51D and found the system to be easy to use and it took all of perhaps 10 to 15 minutes to create ratings for the four areas that get scored and then create the entries in the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 61, Issue 12

2011-05-25 Thread Citronnier - Alexis Bory
Le 25/05/2011 22:28, Stuart Buchanan a écrit : This is done. I've gone ahead and replaced the article completely with the rating system described in December. Now I'm off to rate all the aircraft I maintain! -Stuart Hehe, nice to see that a rating system may have a chance to be established.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 61, Issue 12

2011-05-25 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hello, Thanks for the poke. I completely forgot to write this up. I'll try to do this today, though it needs a proper name. This is done. I've gone ahead and replaced the article completely with the rating system described in December. Now I'm off to rate all the aircraft I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 61, Issue 12

2011-05-25 Thread Hal V. Engel
On Wednesday, May 25, 2011 01:28:39 PM Stuart Buchanan wrote: On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 9:19 AM, I wrote: On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote: I used it for the P-51D and found the system to be easy to use and it took all of perhaps 10 to 15 minutes to create ratings for the