we need to sit on this as
2.2.freeflightsim.org.. We need a marketing plam somwhat.. I hope we stick
to release schedule..
We are currently well on track. We fixed many bugs from the tracker and now
that June has arrived, there are just roughly two weeks until we freeze 'next'
for the final
Am 01.06.11 07:41, schrieb Torsten Dreyer:
Can you please update http://wiki.flightgear.org/Release_Plan with this
very important information ? Something like a short description of
current state ?
Thanks a lot, Yves
Hi Yves,
this particular wiki page was written (mostly by myself) to
Chris/Geoff,
I normally see reams of these and other similar lines.
I think that you are seeing some form of count for terrain type.
My usual output has other textures mixed in there and only ever 3 as
the number expressed.
If you are using a hight level of detail (OSM residental) and processing
Hi Torsten
I only missed the statements from your message here in the list, which
is very important to see current progress. Because i.e. Text on
gitorious does not reflect the new plan. Sorry, I was away for some
weeks ... Maybe I will add a box or something on top of the wiki page
to
Another one, maybe final, attempt to attract FG community attention to
high altitude/speed flights and current terrain engine problems with it.
Current terrain engine makes flights on high altitudes or long flights
on high speeds unreasonable. There is no Earth surface visible, only
blue fog, but
Current terrain engine makes flights on high altitudes or long flights
on high speeds unreasonable. There is no Earth surface visible, only
blue fog, but lags very big, fps may drop to one per second or less,
simulation may crash on attempt to switch to other window and so on,
because it
I've recently done a visual comparison between hires Flightgear scenery
and reality - for those interested, see here:
http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5t=12259
One of the striking points is that in reality even in partially clouded
skies distant objects do not start to fade into
Following the idea of placing conditionals on position in materials.xml, I
have created a rather nice demo for regional textures. But the problem
remains that only the startup position counts, i.e. I suspect
materials.xml is parsed only once during a Flightgear session.
Is there a simple way to
As I indicated in the Forum
http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=6t=12005
a solution to the problem would be to represent Earth from high altitude
by pieces of a hires textured sphere (textures to be obtained from
Celestia), with (at least as demo) a simple Nasal script
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 14:50 +0300, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
I've recently done a visual comparison between hires Flightgear scenery
and reality - for those interested, see here:
http://www.flightgear.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=5t=12259
One of the striking points is that in reality
Greetings fgdata committers,
I notice that there is 4 outstanding merge requests for fgdata master
branch in git (including one that belongs to me).
It also looks like gitorious.org have changed their merge procedure
so it works much better now, which is good news.
Can some folks have
On Tuesday, May 31, 2011 03:02:09 PM Vivian Meazza wrote:
Hal,
I can't follow your logic - because there are some aircraft that need a lot
of work, the system shouldn't recognize advanced features in other
aircraft that do have them?
I should have been clearer - Sorry. What I was trying
On Tuesday, May 31, 2011 10:26:18 PM Robert wrote:
I absolutely agree with Vivian. The users should know about planes that
need much resources (CPU, RAM, VRAM).
This value should not influence the total score.
I think how much compute power is needed and how difficult a model is to
use/fly
Hi all,
with the last commit from James Turner I could not build FGFS on Linux.
Now with a fix from Frederic, I can compile but still not link.
Here is what I got:
http://pastebin.com/Xye7VeWr
g++ (Debian 4.6.0-6) 4.6.1 20110428 (prerelease)
Regards,
Roland
signature.asc
Description: This is
On 01.06.2011 20:48, Roland Häder wrote:
with the last commit from James Turner I could not build FGFS on Linux.
Fixed now. Friends of CMake forgot about automake... ;-)
cheers,
Thorsten
--
Simplify data backup and
Please see inline and below:
- Original Message -
Please see inline and below:
On Friday, May 27, 2011 05:23:59 PM Frederic Bouvier wrote:
AFAICS, MSVC2010 compiles current Git version without any problem.
The OP
doesn't say what version he is trying to build, but if I recall
Adding to Hal's comments:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Hal V. Engel wrote:
On Tuesday, May 31, 2011 03:02:09 PM Vivian Meazza wrote:
I also disagree with Stuart that such advanced
features are nice-to-haves and add little to the simulation - why the hell
are we including them then? Do the
Geoff McLane wrote:
It is certainly _NOT_ 'normal' behavior, and
historically (I assume Curt ;=)) implemented some
draconian 'rlimit' - setrlimit(RLIMIT_CPU,timeout),
to abort after a period of time, which is just
NOT available in my WIN32 environment, to avoid
such a 'forever' loop...
Hi,
18 matches
Mail list logo
