quote fred: There is nothing that could prevent to release it under the GPL,
but in
the light of
recent events (read FPS) I am not fond of releasing something that
couldn't be used..
true but why not follow the Android etc. examples to not put everything under
GPL?
--- On Sun, 6/5/11,
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 07:43:12 Michael Sgier wrote:
why not simply change the fgfs licence once and for all? Android is not all
GPL anymore...we could do the very same.-
Would you really want to restrict the very freedoms that made FlightGear such
a successful project, just to have some
..protection under the GPL, depends on a willingness on the
part of the copyright owners to actually exercise their rights
under copyright law to defend or enforce their copyrights.
..if there is no such willingness in any FlightGear author,
there is no legal protection of FlightGear, and
On 08.06.2011 08:18, Michael Sgier wrote:
quote fred: There is nothing that could prevent to release it under the
GPL, but in
the light of
recent events (read FPS) I am not fond of releasing something that
couldn't be used..
Don't cut quotes. Fred actually agreed to release it under the GPL
Hal,
Glad to be able to help. I'm looking forward to your corrected model, then
I'll use it in part or in for the TR1133. As you probably know, the SCR-522
was the TR1133 built initially under a UK contract in the US. The TR1133
transmitter and receiver were reworked by Bendix into a single
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:30:12 +0200, ThorstenB wrote in message
4def2504.8020...@gmail.com:
On 08.06.2011 08:18, Michael Sgier wrote:
If you really want to fight those scamers, there's a very simple
way to do that: inform people.
..about what, FlightGear authors lack of willingness to
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:30:12 +0200, ThorstenB wrote in message
4def2504.8020...@gmail.com:
On 08.06.2011 08:18, Michael Sgier wrote:
If you really want to fight those scamers, there's a very simple
way to do that: inform people.
..about what, FlightGear authors
Hi,
why make it all so complicated? FGFS is GNU GPL (2/3?). Report that scam
to the FSF (Free Software Foundation). Maybe you will get nothing better
back than just to report that video to youtube (show prove to youtube,
and they must listen) but at least their scamming activity becomes more
..protection under the GPL, depends on a willingness on the
part of the copyright owners to actually exercise their rights
under copyright law to defend or enforce their copyrights.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't see how willingness to exercise
copyright under GPL would require moving to
Am 08.06.11 07:43, schrieb Michael Sgier:
why not simply change the fgfs licence once and for all? Android is not all
GPL anymore...we could do the very same.-
Why not throwing all the sources to trash and tell people the project
does not exist anymore ? :-)
No licence change has to be
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:06:48 +0300 (EEST), thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote
in message
54776.130.234.144.77.1307524008.squir...@webmail3.cc.jyu.fi:
..protection under the GPL, depends on a willingness on the
part of the copyright owners to actually exercise their rights
under copyright law to
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 12:13:42 +0200, HB-GRAL wrote in message
4def4b56.1080...@sablonier.ch:
Am 08.06.11 07:43, schrieb Michael Sgier:
why not simply change the fgfs licence once and for all? Android is
not all GPL anymore...we could do the very same.-
Why not throwing all the sources
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 08:44:25 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
isncp9$g82o$1...@osprey.mgras.de:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 08 Jun 2011 09:30:12 +0200, ThorstenB wrote in message
4def2504.8020...@gmail.com:
On 08.06.2011 08:18, Michael Sgier wrote:
If you really want to fight
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 12:27:30 Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:06:48 +0300 (EEST), thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote
in message
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't see how willingness to exercise
copyright under GPL would require moving to a different license.
..you assume
Am Sonntag, den 05.06.2011, 20:18 -0500 schrieb Curtis Olson:
This weekend I took the plunge and upgraded my main desktop machine to
Fedora 15 + Gnome 3. Out of the gate I hit some serious culture
shock, but I'm starting to get the hang of the new gnome interface and
it's growing on me
Am Mittwoch, den 08.06.2011, 08:19 +0200 schrieb Stefan Seifert:
Would you really want to restrict the very freedoms that made FlightGear such
a successful project, just to have some legal means against some shady people
who try to fool the uninformed into paying some money for FG? Chances
Oliver wrote:
This guy is allready calling its product Microsoft Flight Simulator
2011, so he doesn't even care about the trademarks of Microsoft
products or its company name.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6SX56YCTc5M
Now that video IS a copyright violation. It is a copy of Oscar's
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Robert wrote:
Look what I have found on Dailymotion:
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xgg2j5_next-generation-flight-simulator-2011-2012-demo_videogames
http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xh4vzn_pro-flight-simulator-2011-review-1_videogames
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..protection under the GPL, depends on a willingness on the
part of the copyright owners to actually exercise their rights
under copyright law to defend or enforce their copyrights.
Arnt, while the PFS guys are doing morally despicable things, they're
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Martin Spott wrote:
..easy now, without a willingness to defend FlightGear copyright,
Just a repetition of the above. Oh my, what an outstanding example of
canned nonsense,
Yeah, but he stamps New and Improved! on his can of nonsense, so it's
ok, right? *snickers*
g.
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Stefan Seifert wrote:
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 12:27:30 Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:06:48 +0300 (EEST), thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote
in message
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't see how willingness to exercise
copyright under GPL would require moving to
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 06:05:07 -0700 (PDT), Gene Buckle ge...@deltasoft.com
wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..protection under the GPL, depends on a willingness on the
part of the copyright owners to actually exercise their rights
under copyright law to defend or enforce their
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 2:24 PM, David Van Mosselbeen wrote:
Hi all,
I just download the source code of that magic scam at
http://proflightsimulator.com/source/Source-Files.7z
snip
This was discussed ad naseum quite some time ago on this
list and on the forums.
Those unfamiliar are welcome
Ahoy Scenery Guys,
two things related to the transitional solution
use-custom-scenery-data I stumbled on:
No. 1)
As Csaba already pointed out a few days ago[1], aren't the files named
ICAO.parking.xml in $fgdata/Scenery/Airports/I/C/A/ supposed to be
named as ICAO.groundnet.xml in order to work?
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:47:52 +0200, Stefan wrote in message
201106081247.52326.n...@detonation.org:
On Wednesday 08 June 2011 12:27:30 Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 12:06:48 +0300 (EEST), thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi
wrote in message
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I can't see how
..correct, once they are defended. Our current practice is
effectively a license alongside the GPL, until someone gets
off his ass and defends his copyright on his own GPL code.
Ask gpl-violations.org for help. They have already solved some cases.
signature.asc
Description: This is a
I ran some tests yesterday about the possibility of using static jetways
as placeholders. At KSFO, with animated jetways disabled and no dynamic
jetway models at all, FPS was at about 32-33 on my system. With animated
jetways, it plummeted to 15-16. When I used
$FG_ROOT/Models/Airport/jetway.xml
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..our current GPL practice [...]
Arnt, for what stupid reason are you using the terms we and our ?
Except from annoying the developer's mailing list with unwanted
outpourings you have not been involved in the FlightGear project at
all, at least not for the last twelve years.
http://hsf-sulzbach.de/indexz51X.php
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
http://hsf-sulzbach.de/indexz51X.php
Stuart, your yahoo account has been comprimised. Please change your
password asap!
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.simpits.org/geneb - The
More spam on yahoo accounts?
--
EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content
authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image
Editing and ensure content is compliant with
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Ryan M wrote:
More spam on yahoo accounts?
I think what is happening is people might be getting whacked by drive-by
browser attacks or something else. What I've been seeing is a number of
people with Yahoo addresses getting hit like this - it seems to be pretty
platform
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 19:59:23 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
isokar$lc0u$1...@osprey.mgras.de:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..our current GPL practice [...]
Arnt, for what stupid reason are you using the terms we and our ?
Except from annoying the developer's mailing list with unwanted
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011 14:57:46 -0700 (PDT), Gene wrote in message
alpine.lfd.2.00.1106081456310.12...@grumble.deltasoft.com:
On Wed, 8 Jun 2011, Ryan M wrote:
More spam on yahoo accounts?
I think what is happening is people might be getting whacked by
drive-by browser attacks or something
Hi,
Flightgear Mac OS X site also has a note. See
http://macflightgear.sf.net/home/downloads
By the way, one thing I really hate about these products is that they skip
supporting users. As a result, more than 30 users yelled at me like:
hey, I got your product but I can't launch it
Alex D-HUND wrote:
two things related to the transitional solution
use-custom-scenery-data I stumbled on:
The recommended way of defining Scenery directories is to put multiple
directories into the Scenery-Path, whereas the TerraSync-directory
should be precede the Base Package Sceners. See
Martin Spott wrote:
The recommended way of defining Scenery directories is to put multiple
directories into the Scenery-Path, whereas the TerraSync-directory
should be precede the Base Package Sceners. See also:
Please excuse my typos and spelling mistakes, I'm simply too tired,
37 matches
Mail list logo
