Re: [Flightgear-devel] OpenScenegraph MSVC8

2006-11-04 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi, But there is one problem with the running flightgear than: it's about a factor 2 slower than the flightgear with plib (and shadows on)! I don't know if this can be improved with other compiler flags, but I am a little bit surprised. I moved the pre-osg branch to the same 3rdparty

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear starting time

2006-11-04 Thread Olaf Flebbe
However, FG-OSG compiled using Olaf's stuff (for which we must be most grateful) is both significantly slower to load and run than FG-Plib compiled with MSVC8 here. You actually see a slowdown on loading ? - Using Tomcat

[Flightgear-devel] OpenScenegraph MSVC8

2006-10-30 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi, A first try for a new build system including OSG for MSVC8 is at http://www.oflebbe.de/oflebbe/FlightGear. I was able to compile and run sucessfully a FlightGear executable from it. Greetings Olaf - Using Tomcat but

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OpenSceneGraph

2006-10-27 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Vivian Meazza schrieb: Martin wrote Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] OpenSceneGraph On Fri, Oct 27, 2006 at 09:52:25AM +0200, Martin Spott wrote: Building OSG on IRIX is really simple, just follow the rules, the same for Solaris. Yesterday I tried compiling from CVS on both

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Compiling FlightGear with Dev-C++

2006-10-12 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi, I do not know Dev-C++. But since it uses mingw as a compiler you may find the docs-mini/README.mingw file in the sources usefull. Olaf Hello, does anyone have experience in compiling FlightGear using Dev-C++ under Windows XP and/or 2000? I am a little bit stuck as to what

Re: [Flightgear-devel] up-to-date-version for windows?

2006-10-02 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi, My question is: Does anybody know/has done/has an idea of using CVS under Microsoft(tm) Win(tm)do(w)(tm) XP(tm)? Have a look at the tortoiseCVS software. Olaf - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT

[Flightgear-devel] Visual Studio .net 2005 (aka msvc8) instructions

2006-10-02 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi, In the case there are other users of the project files for MSVC8 included in the CVS: I did a change which will break the build system for MSVC8. More information about the new file systen layout, prebuilt dependency libraries, and instructions on how to recompile them are on

Re: [Flightgear-devel] How to turn off managed-view?

2006-08-17 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi, And from my point of view it is a misfeature to bolt the pilot's head on the fuselage, which is what it looks and feels like with For my point of view it is an error to end up in a constantly rotating view. This is what I get if I restart the bo105 after a crash. Olaf

Re: [Flightgear-devel] hud.hxx vs. HUD.hxx

2006-07-09 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi, The current layout breaks the VC8 Project files in current FG CVS quite heavily. #include hud.hxx vs. #include HUD.hxx That's not a valid argument, as the files are to be included as #include Instrumentation/HUD/HUD.hxx and Cockpit/hud.hxx. No ambituity there. But I have no

[Flightgear-devel] hud.hxx vs. HUD.hxx

2006-07-07 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi, please rename either hud.hxx or HUD.hxx. Getting the correct include file spelled with different cases on a on a case insensitive Filesystem (for instance MS Windows) is not easy. The current layout breaks the VC8 Project files in current FG CVS quite heavily. #include hud.hxx vs. #include

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [RFC] HUD

2006-06-20 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi, The comment for fast_log is IMHO incorrect. /** * This function is about 3 times faster than the system log() function * and has an error of about 0.01% */ The relative error can be larger than 7% it is almost nowhere about 0.01% when used in the range [ 0.5 - 1[. Try yourself: Olaf

Re: [Flightgear-devel] apt.dat changes ?

2006-06-15 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi, let me comment on the current apt.dat performance i.e. of the time spent in fgAirportDBLoad: ~25% of time time is spent in simgear::strutils::split ~10% is spent in atof() Measured with Intel VTune using MS Visualc C++ 2005. IMHO it is an indicator that we should not use a plain text

Re: [Flightgear-devel] apt.dat changes ?

2006-06-15 Thread Olaf Flebbe
2006/6/15, Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Olaf Flebbe wrote : Hi, let me comment on the current apt.dat performance i.e. of the time spent in fgAirportDBLoad: ~25% of time time is spent in simgear::strutils::split ~10% is spent in atof() Measured with Intel VTune using MS

Re: [Flightgear-devel] statistics: usage of texture memory (shocking!)

2006-06-15 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi, ..in a similar vein: Is there way to set the jpg-factory screen shot size, other than at compile time by editing this bit in SimGear/simgear/screen/jpgfactory.hxx ?: typedef enum { DEFAULT_XS = 320, DEFAULT_YS = 240 } JPG_FACTORY_ENUM; Does

Re: [Flightgear-devel] apt.dat changes ?

2006-06-15 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Reading the airportlist needs roughly half of the startup time Sorry, more precisly it is 19% ;-) ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] tower patch

2006-06-11 Thread Olaf Flebbe
2006/6/10, Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]: * Olaf Flebbe -- Monday 29 May 2006 23:14: latest workarounds in tower are not quite correct. Please apply. And what about the new ones ...? #1 0x080c4ada in FGTower::CheckCircuitList (this=0xed37920, dt=0.30004) at src/ATC

[Flightgear-devel] tower patch

2006-05-29 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi, latest workarounds in tower are not quite correct. Please apply. Cheers, Olaf tower.cxx.patch Description: Binary data

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MSVC project files

2006-05-21 Thread Olaf Flebbe
2006/5/19, Drew [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I remember Fredric maintained an archive of project files used to compile under MSVC, but I can't find a link to it on FlightGear.org. Are they hosted somewhere? Is version 2005 supported yet? yes. Please use

Re: [Flightgear-devel] compile with MSVC 2005 (the same as msvc 8?)

2006-04-02 Thread Olaf Flebbe
and libraries, but please do not mix them. Olaf 2006/4/2, Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Olaf Flebbe Yes there is a patch outstanding. Please go to the FlightGearLib Project in the solution explorer right click, select properties (the last entry) choose build events / pre build events

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: CVS: FlightGear/src/Main fg_init.cxx,1.159,1.160

2006-04-02 Thread Olaf Flebbe
2006/4/2, Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Olaf Flebbe wrote : My Documents\username *is* more or less $HOME on Windows XP. What ? Do you really use Windows ? Sometimes ... I was commenting on the first posting, but I think I got the intention of the first posting wrong. Sorry

Re: [Flightgear-devel] compile with MSVC 2005 (the same as msvc 8?)

2006-04-02 Thread Olaf Flebbe
2006/4/2, Frank Olaf Sem-Jacobsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Olaf Flebbe wrote: Please check out the dependent builds. All have to be compiled with /MT (Configuration C++/Code Generation) . (What library wet wrong?) I am not sure if this reply was intended for me, but I will go on assuming

Re: [Flightgear-devel] compile with MSVC 2005 (the same as msvc 8?)

2006-04-01 Thread Olaf Flebbe
\config.h The Release Mode was correct only debug was wrong. I have no clue what went wrong with exit(). Olaf 2006/4/1, Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Olaf Flebbe Cygwin last time, so I wonder if anyone has a quick and dirty howto for compiling flightgear and its dependencies in MSVS 2005

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: CVS: FlightGear/src/Main fg_init.cxx,1.159,1.160

2006-04-01 Thread Olaf Flebbe
My Documents\username *is* more or less $HOME on Windows XP. that makes use of this, but I expect more to come. Should we really dump everything to My\ Documents? (~/.fgfs/ is an ideal place for that on Unices.) --- This SF.Net email is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] compile with MSVC 2005 (the same as msvc 8?)

2006-04-01 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Please check out the dependent builds. All have to be compiled with /MT (Configuration C++/Code Generation) . (What library wet wrong?) --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications

Re: [Flightgear-devel] compile with MSVC 2005 (the same as msvc 8?)

2006-04-01 Thread Olaf Flebbe
O.k. for now, but if you intend to compiler Release you have to revert your change, since it was only a type in debug mode AFAIK. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web

Re: [Flightgear-devel] compile with MSVC 2005 (the same as msvc 8?)

2006-04-01 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Thanks! Curtis has a similar patch in his queue. Default modes should have been set correctly both for flightgear and simgear, too. (one is release, other is debug, if I remember correctly). --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] compile with MSVC 2005 (the same as msvc 8?)

2006-03-31 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Cygwin last time, so I wonder if anyone has a quick and dirty howto for compiling flightgear and its dependencies in MSVS 2005? I looked at the wiki, but I think there are some main problems that I don't really Have a look at http://www.oflebbe/oflebbe/FlightGear BTW: The patches for

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear/SimGear dsp/dsw files

2006-03-26 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi, sorry for the delay I second that config.h-msvc6.in (having cygwin to compile MSVC) is plain silly. You may have noticed that the Version in CVS has a config.h-msvc8 without the @VERSION@ madness. ... * They don't even work for newer Visual Studios (Dependencies are broken:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear/SimGear dsp/dsw files

2006-03-21 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Please delete the dsw/dsp files for four reasons:* They don't work as is.* The dsw files are for VC6. Visual C 6 does not compile FlightGear (any more). * They don't even work for newer Visual Studios (Dependencies are broken: Microsofts Fault, not our's) * IMHO No developer uses them.I would vote

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FG AI bug

2006-03-21 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Melchior told me about it and I was able to reproduce it once. I had to increase AI traffic and starting at KSJC (San Jose) I investigated it a lot and it seems to me that two AI Aircrafts have been introduced with the same callsign. (maybe one with the current player callsign) Deleting one of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FG AI bug

2006-03-21 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Neat trick - thanks! I've found the problem - in lines 661 to 664 of tower.cxx we check if t is the user, but then dereference the AI plane pointer of tt based on the result. In the case where t is not the user, but tt is the user, the AI plane pointer dereference ( -GetLeg() ) kills us.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] FG AI bug

2006-03-21 Thread Olaf Flebbe
The proposed patch is obsolete now, since the real root of the problem seems to be fixed now. --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Next FlightGear Release - upcoming.

2006-03-19 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi,You may try the patch (ATC.diff) I sent a few days ago. I would be interested if this would fix it. I wonder if you see any of the diagnostics . already known in the output.Olaf 2006/3/18, Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 19:19:19 +0100Melchior FRANZ wrote: * Melchior

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: Next FlightGear Release - upcoming.

2006-03-10 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi,2006/3/9, David Luff [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Melchior FRANZ writes: * Curtis L. Olson -- Thursday 09 March 2006 17:59: 2. We need to aggressively hunt down any random crashes I'm aware of four crashes: (A) tower.cxx /AI -- old, but very annoying. Happens occasionally. Very hard to reproduce. Olaf

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Nasal in scenery object XML files

2006-03-01 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Is there any chance we can get a nasal-modified binary for Win platform toplay with as soon as something works in an acceptable stable way? I'd appreciate that a lot.If the code is in CVS (and to be turned on manually) or in a reasonable clean patch, I can supply you with a windows build. Just

<    1   2