You might want to give kst [1] a try, which includes a plugin for
weighted least-squares data fitting [2].
imho, kst is the easiest way to plot data in real time (with or
without filters), and works very good with flightgear csv output (with
a little bit of javascript).
Wim
[1]
Flightgear works like a charm on Fedora 7.
Wim
On 11/6/07, Nick Othieno [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks,. If all goes bad I'll just upgrade to FC6 or FC7. Do you know
anyone who has tried it on FC7 and got it working.
On Nov 6, 2007 9:17 PM, Lee Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just did
Hi there,
The attached patch adds support for the Saitek Cyborg evo Wireless
joystick to Flightgear by adding its name to the Cyborg-Evo.xml file.
Greetings,
Wim
Saitek.diff.bz2
Description: BZip2 compressed data
-
This
Hi all,
I bought a new laptop (intel core 2 duo with nvidia graphics card) and
I'm having problems with the (too high) frame rates (fg/osg).
Whenever I look outside in fg, the framerate skyrockets to values
around 300 which induce stutter in the simulation.
A (partial) solution would be to
On 6/27/07, Martin Spott wrote:
wim van hoydonck wrote:
Whenever I look outside in fg, the framerate skyrockets to values
around 300 which induce stutter in the simulation.
A (partial) solution would be to increase /sim/model-hz in the
internal properties browser, so that less time
I just noticed that there might be/is a typo in the ch53e-yasim.xml file.
change:
ground-effect-constatnt=1.25
to:
ground-effect-constant=1.25
Greetings,
Wim
On 1/3/07, wim van hoydonck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I just checked Janes' All the world aircraft (versions 1979-1880
I just looked at the data for the ch47, and I think there are some
values that could/should change, based on the data for our own chinook
flight dynamics model (for the CH47D)
rotor parameters:
blade mass - 111.6 [kg]
omega - 23.562 [rad/s] (=225 rpm) - value much too high in yasim config file
with
another configuration.
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, wim van hoydonck wrote:
blade mass - 111.6 [kg]
This is different from the blade mass I am using: 357 lbs ~= 162 kg
An upgraded blade perhaps? Composite material technology hasn't exactly stood
still in the last 20 years.
blade twist
] wrote:
Hi Wim,
wim van hoydonck schrieb am 19.12.2006 23:44:
The minimum pitch angle at the blade root (or pitch bearing) for most
helicopters is somewhere around 0 degrees, sometimes a bit more,
sometimes a bit less. This is probably dictated by airworthiness
requirements related
] http://users.pandora.be/tuinbels/afstuderen/appA.pdf
On 12/19/06, Maik Justus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Wim
wim van hoydonck schrieb am 18.12.2006 23:23:
Hi Maik,
Once our library opens again next year (they are moving to a new
building), I'll cross check that data with Janes (I work
Hi there,
Some data for the CH53e yasim model, taken from Prouty [1], p. 699.
Looking at the data in cvs, rotor diameters and chords should/could be
changed, just like control input ranges for the main and tail rotor.
Weights (lb):
- Empty:33009
- MTOW
the incidence is measured?
Do you have such data for other helicopters in your book (bo105 (but
here the actual data should be correct), ec135, ec145, ch47d, s76c,
little nellie)?
Thank you,
Maik
wim van hoydonck schrieb am 18.12.2006 15:49:
Hi there,
Some data for the CH53e yasim model
Hi,
The following data is taken from Janes (S76c):
Powerplant:
2 turbomeca Arriel 2S1 turboshafts with FADEC
- each rated at 638 kW (856 shp) for take-off,
- 731 kW (980 shp) OEI for 30 seconds,
- 592 kW (794 shp) max continuous
Standard fuel capacity:
- 1083 litres of which 1064
You may want to try the following app to extract your data:
http://www.frantz.fi/software/g3data.php
Wim
On 11/25/06, Ampere K. Hardraade [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 24 November 2006 04:27, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
I'd suggest using the playback protocol (described here:
Hi there,
That's because you have to install the patched OSG version and not the
one from the AUR (I suppose you did that). See here:
http://wiki.flightgear.org/flightgear_wiki/index.php?title=OpenSceneGraph
Or if you do not want to run the osg version of flightgear, do a
cvs update
Hi there,
The current simgear magnetic model (WMM2000) is out of date. The
attached patch updates this model to use WMM2005, valid between 2005.0
and 2010.0.
The reference for this patch is:
http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/seg/WMM/data/TRWMM_2005.pdf
Greetings,
Wim
magvar.patch
Description:
Hi there,
I was browsing through the code of simgear and noticed that the
magnetic model used is the one defined in 2000. Since these magnetic
models are only valid for 5 years, it is outdated.
Sourcecode and documentation for the latest model (2005) can be
downloaded from here:
, wim van hoydonck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I was browsing through the code of simgear and noticed that the
magnetic model used is the one defined in 2000. Since these magnetic
models are only valid for 5 years, it is outdated.
Sourcecode and documentation for the latest model (2005) can
18 matches
Mail list logo
