On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 08:30 +0200, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Looks great, flies good. I managed some pretty landings after I got a
feel for it. Is it supposed to pitch down so violently when the flaps
deploy, though?
No, that has to be improved
There is an entry in SenecaII-jsbsim.xml
There is an entry in SenecaII-jsbsim.xml controlling pitch due to flaps.
I changed the signs and it pitches up, but way too much.
Yep - the flap behaviour is crap - I'm working on an improved FDM config. Have
to get deeper in my old aerodynamics books for that...
So the TAS dial is manually
On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 08:30 +0200, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Looks great, flies good. I managed some pretty landings after I got a
feel for it. Is it supposed to pitch down so violently when the flaps
deploy, though?
No, that has to be improved
There is an entry in SenecaII-jsbsim.xml
Looks great, flies good. I managed some pretty landings after I got a
feel for it. Is it supposed to pitch down so violently when the flaps
deploy, though?
No, that has to be improved
The instrument panel is outstanding, does (will) the white dial on the
airspeed indicator move to give
On Mon, 2006-04-24 at 22:38 +0200, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Hi all,
it's been a while, since I announced the model for a Seneca. It is a *LOT*
more work, than I expected it to be so it took a lot longer than I thought.
But I think I can show you what I have so far:
Hi all,
it's been a while, since I announced the model for a Seneca. It is a *LOT*
more work, than I expected it to be so it took a lot longer than I thought.
But I think I can show you what I have so far:
http://www.t3r.de/fg/seneca/
The site gives you a something to look at and a
6 matches
Mail list logo
