Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8

2012-12-22 Thread Clement de l'Hamaide
I have had no contact with them either by phone or otherwise. http://equipe-flightgear.forumactif.com/t899p30-pour-une-meilleur-integration-des-travaux-de-la-paf-dans-flightgear#15971 In English the last line is let me know when you're ready and I call him

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8

2012-12-22 Thread geneb
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012, Clement de l'Hamaide wrote: I have had no contact with them either by phone or otherwise. I don't know whether or not either party has a legitimate gripe. What I DO know is that it doesn't have a damn thing to do with the purpose of this mailing list. I would strongly

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8

2012-12-22 Thread Gijs de Rooy
I would strongly request you take your drama to the forums. It has no place here. Better take the drame to your own forum... This all just leads away from the issue raised by Emilian: the DR400 document that Emanuel uploaded contains a copyright notice that is not compatible with the GPL.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8

2012-12-22 Thread geneb
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012, Gijs de Rooy wrote: I would strongly request you take your drama to the forums. It has no place here. Better take the drame to your own forum... That makes no sense at all. I'll write it off to a collision between your writing and my understanding. :) This all just

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8

2012-12-22 Thread Gijs de Rooy
Better take the drame to your own forum... That makes no sense at all. I'll write it off to a collision between your writing and my understanding. :) With your forum I meant Emmanuel's forum. Didn't mean Gene's forum :-) Sorry for being unclear.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8

2012-12-22 Thread geneb
On Sat, 22 Dec 2012, Gijs de Rooy wrote: Better take the drame to your own forum... That makes no sense at all. I'll write it off to a collision between your writing and my understanding. :) With your forum I meant Emmanuel's forum. Didn't mean Gene's forum :-) Sorry for being unclear.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8

2012-12-22 Thread TDO Brandano
You mean you speak Dutch? :) Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 11:47:19 -0800 From: ge...@deltasoft.com To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8 On Sat, 22 Dec 2012, Gijs de Rooy wrote: Better take the drame to your own

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8

2012-12-22 Thread Vivian Meazza
Double, most of the time J Vivian From: TDO Brandano [mailto:tdo_brand...@hotmail.com] Sent: 22 December 2012 20:51 To: Flightgear Devel List Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8 You mean you speak Dutch? :) Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2012 11:47:19

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 80, Issue 8

2012-12-21 Thread BARANGER Emmanuel
Le 21/12/2012 23:31, flightgear-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net a écrit : Hi Clement Yes it is really sad to see such commit messages. But maybe the PAF team also thinks too concurrently in headers, gpl and copyright notice and file descriptions here. Maybe the PAF team has to take