Hi,
I have just put a new version of ogel to
http://www.t3r.de/fg/ogel/
and there are now two versions available:
one is for FG v 0.9.9 and before using the old JSBSim Code and one is for
current FG CVS with new JSBSim with the 2.x config-files.
Also, I put into the XML files the GPL header and
On Thursday 12 January 2006 15:42, AJ MacLeod wrote:
The ogeL is a really nice model, just needs a some drop tanks for our more
adventurous flights...
Hrm... spoke too soon. That, and a JSBSim-2.0 compatible config :-(
AJ
---
This SF.net
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:29:45 +0100, Torsten wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi all,
I just got a e-mail from LEGO saying that they grant permission to
publish the 3d-model to be used in FlightGear as I requested.
Only two restrictions apply:
- the word LEGO has to be followed by the
I tried the same approach as everyone else: get as close to the original as
possible.
What makes a model of a kids toy different from a model of a A380, a Cub, a
747 or a PA28?
But to keep it safe, I will send a description and a link to my model and to
flightgear to Lego and ask for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Torsten Dreyer schrieb:
I tried the same approach as everyone else: get as close to the original as
possible.
What makes a model of a kids toy different from a model of a A380, a Cub, a
747 or a PA28?
But to keep it safe, I will send a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ralf Gerlich schrieb:
Hi,
Christian Mayer schrieb:
BTW: at least in Germany it makes a difference if it used
geschäftsmäßig or not. As someone might ask money for distributing it
(at least the big distributions are!), it falls under the
Hi,
Christian Mayer schrieb:
IANAL, as well, but I think geschäftsmäßig does not necessarily have
to do with charging money for something. AFAIK it's about whether you do
something regularly. So even distributing it on a private webpage might
be considered geschäftsmäßig. However, I'm not sure
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:10:10 +0100, Torsten wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I tried the same approach as everyone else: get as close to the
original as possible.
What makes a model of a kids toy different from a model of a A380, a
Cub, a 747 or a PA28?
But to keep it safe, I will
..hang on a sec: Did you make ogeL, or did Lego? Extend this a bit, and
ask whether we can legally model the A380, the Wright Flyer etc.
..the test is, who made it. Inspiration can legally come from
anywhere, even from Microsoft. ;o)
We're wise to document all the details, however.
Oh -
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:36:08 +0100, Torsten wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
..hang on a sec: Did you make ogeL, or did Lego? Extend this a bit,
and ask whether we can legally model the A380, the Wright Flyer etc.
..the test is, who made it. Inspiration can legally come from
I thought ogeL had something to do with OpenGL at first, so I think it
would stand against allegations of trademark dilution :)
Besides, Lego owns the rights to the concept of linking the building
blocks used in the model, not the model itself, much less a computer
rendition of that model.
The
Hi everybody,
i made a new aircraft and placed it here:
http://www.t3r.de/fg/ogel/
It's name is ogeL.
ogeL?
Well - look yourself and with a little imagination...
Stay young!
Greetings, Torsten
(Comments, bugreports etc. are welcome)
Torsten Dreyer wrote:
i made a new aircraft and placed it here:
http://www.t3r.de/fg/ogel/
Oh, this one looks nice !!
Curt, would you add this to your 'collection' ?
Thanks,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 23:21 +0100, Christian Mayer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Torsten Dreyer schrieb:
Hi everybody,
i made a new aircraft and placed it here:
http://www.t3r.de/fg/ogel/
It's name is ogeL.
ogeL?
LOL!
(I hope that the
14 matches
Mail list logo
