Selon Lee Elliott :
On Monday 24 April 2006 12:16, Martin Spott wrote:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
There's a reason why hardly any graphics professional uses a
flatscreen for his work. Those people insist on CRTs. My CRT
was quite cheap, and doesn't seem to have a linear
* Martin Spott -- Sunday 23 April 2006 23:17:
I'm now using a TFT after a customer opted to pay in kind - and I want
to tell you that the difference in displaying colours between CRT and
TFT, even if they both settle in the high-quality/-price region, is
huge,
There's a reason why hardly any
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
There's a reason why hardly any graphics professional uses a flatscreen
for his work. Those people insist on CRTs. My CRT was quite cheap, and
doesn't seem to have a linear voltage/brightness curve, but colors are
OK.
Last year on the LinuxTag I met Harald Koenig again
Martin Spott wrote:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
There's a reason why hardly any graphics professional uses a flatscreen
for his work. Those people insist on CRTs. My CRT was quite cheap, and
doesn't seem to have a linear voltage/brightness curve, but colors are
OK.
Last year on the LinuxTag I
On Mon, 24 Apr 2006, Jon Stockill wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Last year on the LinuxTag I met Harald Koenig again - formerly known as
Mr. S3 :-)
He was displaying a system for handling and employing colour management
profiles. Maybe we can elaborate a recommendation for how to calibrate
On Monday 24 April 2006 12:16, Martin Spott wrote:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
There's a reason why hardly any graphics professional uses a
flatscreen for his work. Those people insist on CRTs. My CRT
was quite cheap, and doesn't seem to have a linear
voltage/brightness curve, but colors are
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
... but, yes, maybe a bit greener to match all sorts of shrubby areas.
I have no clue if the landuse sources distinguish dry shrub and green
shrub. If they do, then my complaint is invalid, of course.
Terra-/FlightGear is able to distinguish between the landcover types
Hi Mel,
I think I need to get a new monitor :D lol
I like the color adjustments you've done to the city [1,2,3] textures, please feel free to commit it to CVS. As for the Default Shrub texture, well it's not really appropriate for my region either...but a slight concession had to be made for
* Martin Spott -- Sunday 23 April 2006 22:14:
Terra-/FlightGear is able to distinguish between the landcover types
listed here - [...]
Thanks. Interesting. But doesn't tell if one and the same shrub type is
used for dry (as in bay area) and for green areas (as I'm used to). Also,
looking at
we are mapping two types to three different textures. Wouldn't it make more sense to map ShrubCover and ShrubGrassCover to different textures? This wouldn't use more space, but possibly match reality
better. I would assume that ShrubCover is greener than
ShrubGrassCover.
The answer isn't that
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
nameShrubCover/name
nameShrubGrassCover/name
textureTerrain/shrub.rgb/texture
textureTerrain/shrub2.rgb/texture
textureTerrain/shrub3.rgb/texture
we are mapping two types to three different textures. Wouldn't it make
more sense to map ShrubCover and
Yeah, I noticed that the colors seemed really close together on the mapsever too. I've been meaning to send you that file for the color mapping (I used the same color averaging method in GIMP as you used however the colors seemed close together).
-Rob
There's another thing: When picking colours
12 matches
Mail list logo
