On 11 Sep 2009, at 06:15, Ron Jensen wrote:
ICAO Annex 10 Volume 1 gives a great amount of information on the nav
radio system in general. Chapter 3 would be a good read for anyone
working on the nav radio code. There is an online version here:
Please consider whether the snotty supercilious response you have just
given is conducive to encouraging others to help.
This project is only going to grow and will need all the help it can get
at a variety of levels.
Your attitude will do nothing to assist there.
I humbly apologise for not
syd adams wrote:
I know , it's wikipedia , but it gives a short explanation of the VOR -DME
pairing ...
I think the pairing of a DME with a VOR is unchallenged. People
(including me) are doubtful about the pairing of a DME with an NDB,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just
Martin Spott wrote:
syd adams wrote:
I know , it's wikipedia , but it gives a short explanation of the VOR -DME
pairing ...
I think the pairing of a DME with a VOR is unchallenged. People
(including me) are doubtful about the pairing of a DME with an NDB,
Martin.
Here's a
On 09/10/09 14:11, willie wrote:
I think the pairing of a DME with a VOR is unchallenged. People
(including me) are doubtful about the pairing of a DME with an NDB,
Here's a real-world discussion showing that they really do exist.
http://www.pprune.org/archive/index.php/t-77933.html
It
OK, so I guess that was entirely my fault on not tuning the DME to the
DME on the NDB-DME station. Blame Atlas for that! :D
Sorry for starting such an OT discussion :P
On 09/10/09 14:11, willie wrote:
I think the pairing of a DME with a VOR is unchallenged. People
(including me) are
Sorry , I was not reading closely enough ...
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.netwrote:
syd adams wrote:
I know , it's wikipedia , but it gives a short explanation of the VOR
-DME
pairing ...
I think the pairing of a DME with a VOR is unchallenged. People
On Thu, 2009-09-10 at 16:03 -0700, John Denker wrote:
2) There is no doubt that there is frequency pairing for
collocated VOR/DME. The pairing scheme for DME/VOR,
DME/MLS, and DME/ILS/MLS are documented starting on
page 3-100 of ICAO Annex 10 Volume 1 Aeronautical
08.09.09, 21:47, James Turner zakal...@mac.com:
BTW, for NDBs, FlightGear *should* be picking the closest NDB with the
matching frequency - exactly as MSFS. If that's not what you're
seeing, that's a bug, and likely my fault. Please let me know a
suitable test location and NDB
On 9 Sep 2009, at 21:28, Atadjanov Daniyar wrote:
Just tested NDB freqs problem - everything work good. Sorry for
panic.
That's good news indeed! I was worried I'd broken the spatial searches.
Thanks for checking, and please let me know if you see other strange
behaviour.
James
On 7 Sep 2009, at 14:36, dave perry wrote:
I was wrong about the height being correct. Thought it might be a
scope
problem for nav_elev so I tried moving the declaration back to
navradio.hxx and moving the assignment of a value back into the
search.
The search is never called??? I'll
James Turner wrote:
- runways (and taxiways) are initialised with the airport elevation
instead of a zero elevation in the apt_loader. This is still a poor
substitute for correct values, but in the absence of source for the
actual runway elevation profile, it's much better than
Hi!
Is it possible to fix another bug in navradio (?) system? If runway or the
region has two (or more) NDBs with same frequency, then FG shows only one of
them _everytime_. In real life (as far as i know) NDBs of working runway are
turned on and other NDBs with same freqs are turned off. In
This:
Just want to ask developers: is it possible to make ILS/LOC
establishing radius more realistic?
What we have now in FG? You can establish ILS/LOC anywere you are if
you are in n-kilometers over airport. In real life ATC asks pilots:
Report localizer established because in real
One thing I would like, if it's not already avaliable: Being able to
tune a DME to a NDB-DME. I can't do that in FG, although Atlas reports
some NDBs as having DME capability.
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the
One thing I would like, if it's not already avaliable: Being able to
tune a DME to a NDB-DME. I can't do that in FG, although Atlas reports
some NDBs as having DME capability.
Huh? As far as I know there are only DME paired to VOR but not NDB. There are
places where DME and NDB might be at the
Then it's my fault :D I don't know how to get DME frequencies, Atlas
doesn't tell me that...
Thanks for the information!
One thing I would like, if it's not already avaliable: Being able to
tune a DME to a NDB-DME. I can't do that in FG, although Atlas
reports
some NDBs as having DME
2009/9/8 Torsten Dreyer tors...@t3r.de:
NDB-DME
There ara a lot NDB-DME in /data/Navaids/nav.dat
...
2 -42.72933900 170.95621900146 310 1000.0 HK HOKITIKA NDB-DME
...
http://wikimapia.org/9701833/Hokitika-NDB-DME
--
---
WBR, Vadym.
2009/9/8 Torsten Dreyer tors...@t3r.de:
NDB-DME
There ara a lot NDB-DME in /data/Navaids/nav.dat
...
2 -42.72933900 170.95621900146 310 1000.0 HK HOKITIKA NDB-DME
...
http://wikimapia.org/9701833/Hokitika-NDB-DME
No doubt about this. But I don't know of any NDB receiver
Do I have to do so with NAV1/2? I don't seem to find any way to tune
the KI226 DME without using the radio dialog/using the NAV radios.
--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
On Tue, 8 Sep 2009, James Turner wrote:
This:
Just want to ask developers: is it possible to make ILS/LOC
establishing radius more realistic?
What we have now in FG? You can establish ILS/LOC anywere you are if
you are in n-kilometers over airport. In real life ATC asks pilots:
Report
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distance_measuring_equipment
I know , it's wikipedia , but it gives a short explanation of the VOR -DME
pairing ...
On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 1:01 PM, James Turner zakal...@mac.com wrote:
On 8 Sep 2009, at 20:01, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
There ara a lot NDB-DME in
On 6 Sep 2009, at 22:50, dave perry wrote:
The height is correct. It looks like every other call of
FGNavRadio::updateWithPower gets the wrong value for nav_elev. Hope
this helps find the bug.
Thanks Dave, this is almost certainly my fault - and indeed all the
airports I tested at are
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 3:37 AM, James Turner wrote:
Thanks Dave, this is almost certainly my fault - and indeed all the
airports I tested at are very close to sea level elevation.
Very odd that it's alternating from a valid value to zero, I'll dig
into the code today.
Dave,
You could be
James Turner wrote:
On 6 Sep 2009, at 22:50, dave perry wrote:
The height is correct. It looks like every other call of
FGNavRadio::updateWithPower gets the wrong value for nav_elev. Hope
this helps find the bug.
I was wrong about the height being correct. Thought it might
On 7 Sep 2009, at 13:00, Curtis Olson wrote:
You could be seeing the results of nav1 nav2 interleaved. You
might try tuning them both in to valid stations and seeing what
happens.
D'oh, good observation Curt :)
Unfortunately having CVS-uped, my SG and FG won't start - crashes with
On 6 Sep 2009, at 05:23, syd adams wrote:
Hello.
Unless Im doing something wrong , I'm now getting these errors
trying to compile FG...
navradio.cxx: In member function ‘virtual void
FGNavRadio::update(double)’:
navradio.cxx:362: error: ‘struct SGVec3d’ has no member named ‘sg’
After many tries , deleting navradio , doing make clean , make distclean,I
finally had to delete the FG and SG source and do a new checkout . Now
everything compiles fine .
Another reason I'd love to see CVS gone :)
--
Let
I updated SimGear, fgfs source and data yesterday for both my desktop
and notebook. The glide slope is now broken. The angle seems correct
but it now acts as if the ILS is always from 0 ft MSL. I tried the rw
23 ILS at KBTL with field elevation of 952 ft, rw 23 at KBJC with field
elevation
Hello.
Unless Im doing something wrong , I'm now getting these errors trying to
compile FG...
navradio.cxx: In member function ‘virtual void FGNavRadio::update(double)’:
navradio.cxx:362: error: ‘struct SGVec3d’ has no member named ‘sg’
navradio.cxx:362: error: ‘struct SGVec3d’ has no member
30 matches
Mail list logo
