Martin Spott wrote:
BTW, it doesn't necessarily require you to hold an IFR rating, the same
counts for VFR flights as well as long as you don't have known terrain
in sight,^
's/known/familiar/g'
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly
On 01/29/2007 11:01 PM, Dave Perry wrote:
This is exactly the situation that John Denker maintained was an
exception to the rule report position as the radial from the station
and DME distance. This pilot agreed with John.
Actually I have changed my mind about this. A couple of days
ago I
I had not planned to comment again on this issue. But today, I received
an AOPA e-mail that included a link to NTSB accident report Number:
DEN04FA043 concerning a FATAL accident involving a Cessna 206 on a
flight from Jeffco (KBJC) to just beyond the Medicine Bow VOR, where it
crashed into a
among other FAA documents which use the phrase inbound radial
without the slightest hesitation.
There are many other instances where you need to know one thing
when taking the written test, and need to know something quite
different for flying in the real world. Unless otherwise
On 01/04/2007 04:28 AM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Well - at least on the eastern side of the atlantic, where I do instrument
flights in real world, the 090 radial is always EAST of the station, the 270
radial is WEST of the station.
A controller advice proceed on radial 090 or intercept radial
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 10:45 -0500, John Denker wrote:
Bottom line:
-- When specifying pointlike positions, radials are rays i.e. half-lines
radiating /from/ the station.
-- When specifying course lines, radials are full lines.
OK, which is it? My initial *correction* was to 1) in this
On 01/03/2007 09:07 PM, Dave Perry wrote:
This may seem a nit. I had the following quote drilled into my mind
by Don Berman in one of his well know Instrument Written Ground School
seminars.
Radials eminate from the station; direction of flight has nothing to
do with location.
1)
7 matches
Mail list logo
