Hi all,
Did some possibly useless patches for SG and FG plib branch:
simgear.plib-distclean.patch:
The directory compatibility/ and threads/ are repeated in
DIST_SUBDIRS as they already present in $(SUBDIRS), causing 'make
distclean' in SG broken.
--- Martin Spott wrote:
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
I have a pair of patches for the c182 and c182rg.
Done for CVS HEAD (OSG),
Thank you.
Could someone commit this for the PLIB branch as well please, as that is
where the bugs manifest themselves.
Thanks,
-Stuart
I have found an early problem with simgear-0.3.11-pre1
configure and make went fine,
but make check has stopped with errors.
make[2]: Entering directory `/usr/src/SimGear-0.3.11-pre1/simgear/math'
make SGMathTest
make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/SimGear-0.3.11-pre1/simgear/math'
if g++
Martin Spott wrote:
Why is setting to 0.0 not sufficient to reach the desired goal ?
Martin.
This lines only initialize the internal values of the electrical system.
The properties are set in the propagate function :
// publish values to specified properties
for ( i =
Hi,
On Saturday 19 May 2007, gh.robin wrote:
I try to understand the big FPS differences i get when i build FG
first with an old OSG library 10 april 2007,
second with a recent OSG library 1.9.4 version
I believe that you built osg without optimization.
When building without optimization you
Mathias Fröhlich schrieb:
Hi,
On Saturday 19 May 2007, gh.robin wrote:
I try to understand the big FPS differences i get when i build FG
first with an old OSG library 10 april 2007,
second with a recent OSG library 1.9.4 version
I believe that you built osg without optimization.
Hi Tim,
Just tried this patch and had a couple observations (beyond noticing that it
generally works pretty well.) :-)
1. The application continuously scrolls the following message:
Viewer::checkWindowStatus() - 1
I couldn't immediately see where that was coming from.
2. The numeric keypad
Jon S. Berndt wrote:
I'm not in a position at this time to check whether Z pos'n in the
FDM/configuration file was wrong or the Z offset in the Model file
was wrong;
Unless the one that's in the FlightGear distribution is different from the
one that's been in JSBSim CVS for years, it isn't
Short version:
Here is the link to an updated patch which (a) corrects the
VRP precisely as Anders did with the F80C while removing the
somewhat incorrect Z offset in /Models and (b) adds several
contact points. It does not change any other pre-existing
gear, etc coordinates:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 19 May 2007, gh.robin wrote:
I try to understand the big FPS differences i get when i build FG
first with an old OSG library 10 april 2007,
second with a recent OSG library 1.9.4 version
I believe that
On Mon 21 May 2007 19:46, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
Hi,
On Saturday 19 May 2007, gh.robin wrote:
I try to understand the big FPS differences i get when i build FG
first with an old OSG library 10 april 2007,
second with a recent OSG library 1.9.4 version
I believe that you built osg
I've discovered that I really love the AN-2 and the new fly-by view mode!
I've posted a youtube video of the FlightGear AN-2 landing at Ranger Creek,
WA (taken with a cheesy digital camera pointed at my computer screen ...):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bGmqDYb2rsw
The video should be ready
Hi,
On Monday 21 May 2007, Tim Moore wrote:
In case it's not obvious how to do that (I sure missed it!), in the
ccmake configuration screen change CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE to Release.
That is also possible ...
Greetings
Mathias
Hi,
I need to know: what coordinate system is Flightgear using actually? Is
it by any chance the worldwide air navigation standard of WGS84
coordinates?
Thx.
Pep Ribal.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
14 matches
Mail list logo
