Heiko wrote:
And especially in FGFS not really Vertices is one of the big problems,
but .xml's and nasal-scripts.
No, you can't say that in general. It quite depends on what you do and
what options you use. Whatever you compute, it costs some amount of
resource, and how long your frame takes
On Sun, 5 Feb 2012, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
I haven't really seen any guidelines about efficient shader coding, but
I've come across a few statements here and in the forum now and then,
which I so far assumed to be true. I've now spent the last few days
benchmarking my
Pushing most of the haze shader computation from the vertex to the
fragment level would seem to suggest an approximately constant cost for
the haze for the same view regardless of scenery complexity since the
number of hazy fragments remain about the same.
Thanks for the explanations - that
Pushing most of the haze shader computation from the vertex to the
fragment level would seem to suggest an approximately constant cost
for the haze for the same view regardless of scenery complexity since
the number of hazy fragments remain about the same.
Thanks for the explanations -
Pushing most of the haze shader computation from the vertex to
the fragment level would seem to suggest an approximately constant
cost for the haze for the same view regardless of scenery complexity
since the number of hazy fragments remain about the same.
Thanks for the
Am 06.02.2012 09:51, schrieb thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi:
I guess my bottomline is that any code running on a per-frame basis should
be made more efficient when it can be made more efficient, regardless if
it is currently the limiting factor for someone or not, simply because it
may be the limiting
http://flightsimulatorplus.com/terms.html
Seems FSP or PFS or FPS or whatever has reinvented itself - that link showed on
my Facebook page just now for the first time in perhaps 6 months.
What shits me is that the site shows screenshots from v2.4.0 or from git, as
the new shader effects are
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Chris Wilkinson wrote:
http://flightsimulatorplus.com/terms.html
Seems FSP or PFS or FPS or whatever has reinvented itself - that link
showed on my Facebook page just now for the first time in perhaps 6
months.
For those of you with YouTube accounts, please search for
Please refrain from providing real/full links to those websites. You help them
getting more exposure
on search engines etc. (these mailinglist discussions are available online)
Gijs
And they even have an old screenshot of FGSD showing LFPX (the airfield where I
used to fly in RL)
ROFL
-Fred
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for
It is a very mixed bag when it comes to screenshots - some look good, some look
old (bad?), some look fake - surely that would be a give-away to warn people
away from it? :-)
Regards,
Chris Wilkinson, YBBN/BNE.
From: Frederic Bouvier fredfgf...@free.fr
To:
Thorsten,
And especially in FGFS not really Vertices is one of the big problems,
but .xml's and nasal-scripts.
No, you can't say that in general. It quite depends on what you do and
what options you use. Whatever you compute, it costs some amount of
resource, and how long your frame takes is
On 7 February 2012 03:24, Chris Wilkinson blobster...@yahoo.com.au wrote:
It is a very mixed bag when it comes to screenshots - some look good, some
look old (bad?), some look fake - surely that would be a give-away to warn
people away from it? :-)
And the 419 Nigerian scams doesn't work.
13 matches
Mail list logo
