How do you want to do interactive placement without interaction? ;-)I think there's no way other than gimp, if the placement of the watermark must
be adjusted for every single image...ThomasThere is PHP library GD which is used to to all kind of stuff with images.If is someone interested to do
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2006-06-04_15:47:21 (curt)
/var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/CanberraBI8/thumbnail.jpg
Add a pict for the web site.
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2006-06-04_18:00:51 (mfranz)
Hi,
On Sunday 11 June 2006 06:53, Mick - wrote:
I've managed to get Mathias' suggestion of using get_elevation_m but with
strange AGL values.
I used calc_gc_lon_lat from simgear/math/polar3d.hxx for getting the
latitude/longitude from
x-meters away, then feeding the resulting lat/lon values
On Friday 09 June 2006 21:50, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..Roberto _ is_ stretching understatement as concept, last years
AirVenture put over 10 000 planes on KOSH. My initial idea
was paint parked planes with copies of one texture. Textures is
what we see out the window in FG and it works on my
2006/6/10, Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
* Olaf Flebbe -- Monday 29 May 2006 23:14:
latest workarounds in tower are not quite correct. Please apply.
And what about the new ones ...?
#1 0x080c4ada in FGTower::CheckCircuitList (this=0xed37920,
dt=0.30004) at
* Olaf Flebbe -- Sunday 11 June 2006 21:03:
Is tower.cxx:905 in your source code this line?
t-landingType = t-planePtr-GetLandingOption();
Yes. And there was no commit since this crash happened, so the line
can't have moved. Sorry, I didn't investigate, because I have ATC always
turned off
On Sunday 11 June 2006 21:09, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Yes. And there was no commit since this crash happened, so the line
can't have moved. Sorry, I didn't investigate, because I have ATC always
turned off because of the flakiness, and I just returned to that mode.
I thought Dave would soon come
* Mathias Fröhlich -- Sunday 11 June 2006 21:31:
On Sunday 11 June 2006 21:09, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
I thought Dave would soon come up with a fixed/rewritten version, anyway.
:-)
True?
Is he working on that?
He said so. We just need to release 1.0 next week, and ... :-)
* David Luff
On Sunday 11 June 2006 21:36, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
He said so. We just need to release 1.0 next week, and ... :-)
* David Luff -- Thursday 20 April 2006 00:04:
| But tower.cxx is the only thing I'm working on at the moment - I want
| it fixed and stable before 1.0 as much as you guys,
Hello,After lots of exams, and almost infinite tasks at university, and before some more to come, I'd like to ask for a few things I'd like to do in the quiet sunny summer days.I'd like to mix FlightGear with Matlab through the aerospace toolbox.
Weeks ago I asked for the 0.9.8a versions, which
Hi
Hello,
After lots of exams, and almost infinite tasks at university, and before
some more to come, I'd like to ask for a few things I'd like to do in the
quiet sunny summer days.
I'd like to mix FlightGear with Matlab through the aerospace toolbox.
Weeks ago I asked for the 0.9.8a versions,
Correu PelDavid wrote:
Hello,
After lots of exams, and almost infinite tasks at university, and before
some more to come, I'd like to ask for a few things I'd like to do in
the quiet sunny summer days.
I'd like to mix FlightGear with Matlab through the aerospace toolbox.
Weeks ago I
On Saturday 10 June 2006 13:15, Tony Pelton wrote:
heck, even taking the records, and stuffing those records, as they are
now, into XML would be a start.
Already in XML format...
http://www.cs.yorku.ca/~cs233144/export_cyyz.svg
http://www.cs.yorku.ca/~cs233144/export_eddf.svg
I have posted an initial (but still useful) article I am writing on the
process of creating a JSBSim aircraft model. You can read it here:
http://jsbsim.sourceforge.net/CreatingJSBSimAircraft.pdf
If you have any comments on what is unclear, or where more detail needs to
be added, please let me
Before continuing, I thought I'd verify a few points with those in the know.
Through observation, I found that my calculated agl value (as discussed in
my
previous post) was close to that of /position/ground-elev-ft when using
the
current lat/lon values instead of those from
Point3D
15 matches
Mail list logo
