=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2007-06-10_01:07:36 (durk)
/var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/AIModel/AIAircraft.cxx
Changed formatting to K&R/4 by "popular demand".
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2007-06-10_03:50:03 (fredb)
/var/cvs/F
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
2007-06-11_11:09:51 (mfranz)
/var/cvs/SimGear-0.3/source/simgear/props/props.cxx
advance tracing messages from SG_INFO to SG_ALERT. If a developer has
demanded tracing, then he shouldn't get these important messages buried
in thousands
Bohnert Paul wrote:
>
> All,
>
> The EAA fly-in at Oshkosh is the last week of July.
>
> Is anyone doing anything FlightGear related at EAA Oshkosh this year?
>
> Last year I noticed a few vendors were using FlightGear. Mostly to
> demostate flight simulator hardware.
>
> Robin's latest airport
Hello,
I notice a some strange behaviours with the Instrument Altimeter
The Instrument Altimeter is unable to indicate more than 61831 feet
Here the snapshot of property:
instrument/altimeter/indicated-altitude-ft==> 61831
position/altitude-ft ==> 75793
http://perso.orange.fr/GR
Welcome to those who decided to have a look at this posting despite the
highlited keyword in the Subject ;-)
Curt, I decided to write this into public because I think the
FlightGear project in its current form, driven by people with the aim
to build "something better" (TM), is starting to suffer
Ron Jensen wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 10:37 +, Martin Spott wrote:
> > This is everuthing I need to build FG with current OSG,
> >
>
> Thanks, but the problem is in OSG. I have been building and installing
> debian packages. Its not the supported way to build, so when it quit
> working
On Sat, 2007-06-16 at 10:37 +, Martin Spott wrote:
> Ron Jensen wrote:
>
> > I must agree. I haven't had a working flightgear for about a month
> > because OSG-SVN/head quit building for me.
>
> How does the error message look like ? I know, unfortunately I'm
> repeating myself, yet it mig
Nick Warne wrote:
> I have been building OSG over the last 3 months, and even updated today to
> rev. 7002 - everything builds/works great and I haven't had to touch a
> thing!?
Perhaps you've been building against old OSG headers. Few weeks ago
Robert Osfield has removed a header file that con
On 6/10/07, Csaba Halász <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This is better code anyway, so we should get it into OSG.
Looks like I was wrong there, the constructor call is not equivalent
to the reserve call.
So just comment out the reserve call on line 922. I get invalid
pointers later on at exit, but
Martin Spott wrote:
> Hans Ulrich Niedermann wrote:
>
>> recently one of my aircraft had invalid XML, and the parser duly threw
>> an exception. Unfortunately, fgInitFDM() considered it appropriate to
>> report the error as
>>
>>,
>>| FlightGear aborting
>>`
>>
>> and actually
Hi,
Ooops, I forgot to comment out a debug line in A-10/Nasal/A-10-fuel.nas
Sorry for that,
Alexis
Index: Nasal/A-10-fuel.nas
===
RCS file: /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Aircraft/A-10/Nasal/A-10-fuel.nas,v
retrieving revision 1.2
di
On Saturday 16 June 2007 11:37:35 Martin Spott wrote:
> Ron Jensen wrote:
> > I must agree. I haven't had a working flightgear for about a month
> > because OSG-SVN/head quit building for me.
>
> How does the error message look like ? I know, unfortunately I'm
> repeating myself, yet it might help
Ron Jensen wrote:
> I must agree. I haven't had a working flightgear for about a month
> because OSG-SVN/head quit building for me.
How does the error message look like ? I know, unfortunately I'm
repeating myself, yet it might help applying this patch to FlightGear:
--- FlightGear/src/Main/f
"Curtis Olson" wrote:
> Our approach with plib is that if we absolutely must depend on something in
> cvs, we push the plib folks hard to get that into an official release first,
> then we cut over and allow our code to depend on it. This is not without
> headaches, but it's worked pretty well fo
Jonathan Wagner wrote:
> Just a thought for the rest of the list. Now that OpenSceneGraph-2.0
> has been released, what are the thoughts on setting that as a "fixed"
> dependency for now (i.e., future development should work on
> OpenSceneGraph-2.0).
While we are at it, somebody could now add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
This patch fixes the test for support of cursor changes in OSG 2.0.
Tim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGc5T/eDhWHdXrDRURAhbfAKCxT8vRMAmHHDAgjlL
16 matches
Mail list logo
