John Denker wrote:
1) I closed the bug-tracker issue concerning the taxiway
signs. That's all good.
2) Alas there are other scenery elements that still
exhibit an improper dependence on camera tilt angle.
Example:
http://www.av8n.com/fly/fgfs/img48/pole-dark.png
in contrast to
Could the poster be referring to the pole in the middle distance on the
right directly above the compass, it changes from bright whites into
greys, or even transparence. Pretty subtle.
I have a hard time seeing any difference between the two images.
- James Sleeman a écrit :
Could the poster be referring to the pole in the middle distance on
the
right directly above the compass, it changes from bright whites into
greys, or even transparence. Pretty subtle.
I have a hard time seeing any difference between the two images.
This
As noted by John in February, but I did not see it addressed in this thread, is
the chase view issue in 2.0. (chase view does not follow heading, and if you
select chase while in a turn the viewpoint holds that angle until you leave the
viewpoint) I sincerely hope it's not a feature, as there
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Peter Brown wrote:
As noted by John in February, but I did not see it addressed in this
thread, is the chase view issue in 2.0. (chase view does not follow
heading, and if you select chase while in a turn the viewpoint holds
that angle until you leave the viewpoint)
Hey folks,
you won't belive that- but Flight Pro Sim releases a new version! Isn't it
surprising?
Did you know that many of the technologies used in FlightGear are the same
within FlightProSim?
And that this has many improved graphics as well as 3D clouds and cool water?
And did you know
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hey folks,
you won't belive that- but Flight Pro Sim releases a new version! Isn't it
surprising?
Did you know that many of the technologies used in FlightGear are the same
within FlightProSim?
And that this has many improved graphics as well as 3D clouds and cool
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hey folks,
you won't belive that- but Flight Pro Sim releases a
new version! Isn't it surprising?
Did you know that many of the technologies used in
FlightGear are the same within FlightProSim?
And that this has many improved graphics as well as 3D
clouds
- Heiko Schulz a écrit :
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hey folks,
you won't belive that- but Flight Pro Sim releases a
new version! Isn't it surprising?
Did you know that many of the technologies used in
FlightGear are the same within FlightProSim?
And that this has many
One idea which I've used before, would be to create the
flightprosim.flightgear.org subdomain. then link sites (eg wiki, 3rd
party) to the subdomain. This gets it well up in the rankings and is
easy to implement.
When end up on that domain is a nice notice explaining what flightprosim.
Also
I did a bit of poking around FPS.com web site and found a
download
link on the disclaimer page (link:
http://www.flightprosim.com/disclaimer/).
The link to the download
file sourcess.zip contains a snapshot of the wiki from
October last
year along with some interesting stuff.
Clickbank is an interesting site.
See
http://www.clickbank.com/help/vendor-help/vendor-basics/selling-basics/what-products-are-allowed/
Perhaps they should be advised that he is selling GPL software which
includes material with copyright by many contributors.
On the other hand they may
Is it the same as this bug
Chase-view broken
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=99
pete
Anders Gidenstam wrote:
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Peter Brown wrote:
As noted by John in February, but I did not see it addressed in this
thread, is the chase view issue in 2.0.
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hey folks,
you won't belive that- but Flight Pro Sim releases a
new version! Isn't it surprising?
Did you know that many of the technologies used in
FlightGear are the same within FlightProSim?
And that this has many improved graphics as well as 3D
Heiko Schulz wrote:
That won't stop the fact that he already makes money with our work.
And yes, I seriously believe that he is able to bring our project in danger.
Making money is one thing; it's allowed by the GPL.
Problem here seems that, while our project tries to do everything to
keep it
Hi,
Fred wrote:
I think the whole thread should be removed by the moderator. I see no point
making
him advertisement and letting the flames grow up.
Has been done. Reason: we do not tolerate spam at our forums. No matter if that
is
some weird non-related software or a paid version of
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:50:34 +0100, Erik wrote in message
4b9e655a.9050...@ehofman.com:
Heiko Schulz wrote:
That won't stop the fact that he already makes money with our work.
And yes, I seriously believe that he is able to bring our project
in danger.
Making money is one thing; it's
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I think the whole thread should be removed by the moderator. I see no
point making him advertisement and letting the flames grow up.
Oh yes, I'm supportive of this procedure, also of installing a
'flightprosim.flightgear.org' page - which could get re-directed to the
- Martin Spott a écrit :
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I think the whole thread should be removed by the moderator. I see
no
point making him advertisement and letting the flames grow up.
Oh yes, I'm supportive of this procedure, also of installing a
'flightprosim.flightgear.org' page
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010, Pete Morgan wrote:
Is it the same as this bug
Chase-view broken
http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=99
Yes, it seems so.
Cheers,
Anders
--
---
Anders Gidenstam
WWW:
I have noticed that one of the screens on their website uses my alternative
summer textures which were partially made using Google Earth images hence they
are not GNU-GPL (see my website http://flightgear.xf.cz ). I do not know how
many problems I could have with Google corporation doing this
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Frederic Bouvier fredfgf...@free.frwrote:
What will happen if this guy creates a flightgear.flightprosim.com page ?
We could only hope ... !!!
Can we get in trouble ourselves for using his name?
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/
On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:04:35 +0100 (CET), Frederic wrote in message
29285847.3999171268669075452.javamail.r...@spooler4-g27.priv.proxad.net:
- Heiko Schulz a écrit :
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hey folks,
you won't belive that- but Flight Pro Sim releases a
new version! Isn't
wrote:
What will happen if this guy creates a flightgear.flightprosim.com
page ?
We could only hope ... !!!
Can we get in trouble ourselves for using his
name?
Curt. --
Yes!
And I don't like this idea. It won't help but starts a war, which we maybe
can't win.
Curtis Olson wrote:
On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Frederic Bouvier fredfgf...@free.fr
mailto:fredfgf...@free.fr wrote:
What will happen if this guy creates a flightgear.flightprosim.com
http://flightgear.flightprosim.com page ?
We could only hope ... !!!
Can we get in
This kind of thing happens sometimes -- not much we can do unless we
want to spend tens of thousands of $$ going to court, so there's no
point getting stressed. I did go to Google Sidewiki and leave a
comment on the page, so that anyone using the Google toolbar or a
sidewiki add-on in their
Btw: Blender has more or less the same problem- and it seems from the design of
the webpage, that is the same company.
Blender were able to fight against successfully last year. But this year they
are back.
That's un-believable, but he's done his research, the license allows you to
sell it =/ He obviously did his research and found a loophole. It's a shame
that someone would go the great lengths to actually do something as immoral as
this.
On Mar 15, 2010, at 4:13 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Btw:
This guy sure does waste a lot of time for FG developers to discuss this
every few months :-(
One thing that has struck me that could be done, is to have a welcome
message broadcast to the user on the MP chat when players connect, for
example something like...
Welcome to FlightGear
Just sent an email to New Zealand open Source and got this reply,
pete
Hello Peter,
Thanks for bringing this to our attention. Please recognise that the GPL
does not in any way preclude people from packaging up and selling a
software application *so long as they comply with the terms of the
I have to agree that much can't be done . I hate to see it removed from the
forum , flame war or not , since keeping as much information out there as
possible might keep a few some being conned .
Cheers
--
Download
Just upgraded to the latest CVS (I try to do that).
I found a bug that may be difficult to find at random -- the ground.cxx
bombed out with the following message:
unable to find path to runway threshold in ground.cxx for airport KEMT
followed by the dreaded unknown exception in main loop. I'm
http://home.att.net/~m--sandlin/bug.htm
This gent is having some issues getting an accurate flight model for his
gliders in X-Plane. Apparently cruise speed is 20kts. Anyone care to
give this a shot?
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 19:23 -0700, Gene Buckle wrote:
http://home.att.net/~m--sandlin/bug.htm
This gent is having some issues getting an accurate flight model for his
gliders in X-Plane. Apparently cruise speed is 20kts. Anyone care to
give this a shot?
g.
I know not of this
Hi guys:
I ever successfully build and run the flightgear-1.9.1 under WindowsXP by
MSVC90. It is a great work and very interesting.
Last week I download the source packege of flightgear-2.0.0.
Build the source of flightgear is OK, but when step to debug, there is an
exception:
First-chance
35 matches
Mail list logo
