Still down:
The server at scenemodels.flightgear.org is taking too long to respond.
The server at mapserver.flightgear.org is taking too long to respond.
etc.
Sigh...only in USA. The last swiss power outage must have been ~10 years ago
and only lasting a couple of minutes.
--- On Tue, 5/29/12,
Michael Sgier wrote:
Still down:
Yes, Power and network are available again, but the machine doesn't
boot and so far I'm unable to tell why. I'll announce when it's back.
If it takes too long, I'll switch over to a slower but functional
backup site,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user
Michael Sgier scrat_h...@yahoo.com writes:
Still down:
The server at scenemodels.flightgear.org is taking too long to respond.
The server at mapserver.flightgear.org is taking too long to respond.
etc.
Sigh...only in USA. The last swiss power outage must have been ~10
years ago and only
It it's running Linux, do from a live dvd a fsck.
--- On Fri, 6/1/12, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.net wrote:
From: Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear mapserver offline
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Date: Friday, June 1, 2012,
Michael Sgier wrote:
It it's running Linux, do from a live dvd a fsck.
Cool idea, I've have never thought about that
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
De : Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.net
À : flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Envoyé le : Vendredi 1 juin 2012 13h35
Objet : Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear mapserver offline
Michael Sgier wrote:
It it's running Linux, do from a live dvd a fsck.
Do you have any pictures or dumps of the errors you get upon booting?
- Original Message -
From: Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.net
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Friday, June 1, 2012 1:35:28 PM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear mapserver offline
Michael Sgier
De : EViLSLT - Rob flightg...@evilslut82.com
À : FlightGear developers discussions
flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Envoyé le : Vendredi 1 juin 2012 13h49
Objet : Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear mapserver offline
Do you have any pictures or dumps of the errors you get upon
A while back I helped setup a 2000 node server farm and it was pretty cool.
Each node had a small embedded linux processor on top of the console
access that provided a virtual console over the net -- so you could power
cycle, reset, mount virtual DVD images -- all remotely. The only tricky
part
Hi Ron,
A quick test confirms that you were indeed right:
Engine state: 0, mag: 3, starter: 1, RPM: 440.915466
Engine state: 0, mag: 3, starter: 1, RPM: 440.567566
Engine state: 0, mag: 3, starter: 1, RPM: 447.837677
Engine state: 0, mag: 3, starter: 1, RPM: 445.897156
It must be that the
to be able to do a fsck is absolutely basic...how would you
run a server without that?
--- On Fri, 6/1/12, EViLSLT - Rob flightg...@evilslut82.com wrote:
From: EViLSLT - Rob flightg...@evilslut82.com
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] FlightGear mapserver offline
To: FlightGear developers
There is a change to the starter motor code (should be entering git real soon
now) that may help address this. But your engine should have 'started' as it
exceeded 440 RPM... Anyway, glad it works now, and we can revisit this after
FlightGear syncs JSBSim.
Ron
On Friday 01 June 2012 09:39:52
Actually the engine rpm is usually oscillating between 430 and 450 rpm.
Therefore it must be shutting down and starting up repeatedly, or at
least I think that's what's happening. Also it could be possible that
when the starter engages, it might pull the rpm back momentarily.
In any case, I
It makes me wonder if some other control is battling for the starter
property and it's not consistently switched on?
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Viktor Radnai viktor.rad...@gmail.comwrote:
Actually the engine rpm is usually oscillating between 430 and 450 rpm.
Therefore it must be shutting
Another month's over; time for another edition of the FlightGear Newsletter!
This time with an interesting article about a so called canvas. When
finished, it will allow developers to replicate
the advanced glass cockpits that aircraft tend to have these days more easily.
The monthly
new ubuntu installations etc. offer a rescue boot option but maybe, for such a
remote server, XFS would be the best filesystem? I've never heard of a fsck
needed with xfs.
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive
16 matches
Mail list logo
