Hello,
Can I just ask what version of OpenSceneGraph is required to compile and
run Flightgear/Simgear (v2.0.0). The release page suggests that any
version will do however newer versions =2.9.6 will run better but is
this the case? Will the latest stable release of OpenSceneGraph (2.8.3)
do?
Thanks for the info.
Chris
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 14:47 +0100, James Turner wrote:
On 21 Jul 2010, at 14:01, Chris Baines wrote:
Can I just ask what version of OpenSceneGraph is required to compile and
run Flightgear/Simgear (v2.0.0). The release page suggests that any
version will do
Hello Flightgear Developers,
I am looking at improving the Debian packages and support for your
wonderfull program and associated programs. I have nearly finished
packaging fgrun and am just working on upgrading and improving the other
packages. I have a couple of questions I was hoping you could
Hello,
I am trying to build simgear on Debian, but when I run make check in
the simgear/math folder I get the following output included below. Is
there something I can tweak to fix this bug?
Thanks,
Chris
make SGMathTest SGGeometryTest
make[1]: Entering directory
patch it directly without someones
guidance. Does anyone know if this bug applies to the version of
xmlparse.c included in simgear?
Chris
On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 18:51 +0100, Chris Baines wrote:
Hello,
I am in the process of hopefully updating the simgear package for
Debian. Simgear as far as i am
Hello,
I am trying to update the SimGear package in Debian (from 1.9.1 to
2.0.0), I have packaged the current version of fgrun and plan to upload
it, but it only compiles with SimGear (v2.0.0).
The current Debian Maintainer is as far as I can tell not active at the
moment, which is why I have
going to completely restructure the code
and the build system to directly support building simgear as shared
libraries.
Regards,
Curt.
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Chris Baines wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to update the SimGear package in Debian (from
I love the contradictory passages:
- ProFlightSimulator is an open source stand alone Flight Simulator.
- Customer support is only an email away
(Open source products do not offer any support)
They say open source projects don’t offer support (despite FlightGear
offering community support
I use Gnome 3 and FlightGear and it works well. I do like the Shell,
and after a while it does grow on you.
The main problem I think is that people logically think that as Gnome
3 is released the Shell is completed, where that is far from the
truth, much of the work is still to be done.
As you
A backport should not be needed for wheezy as it is testing, it should
just move in to testing, as you can see on the pts page (
http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/flightgear.html ) this hasn't happened
yet.
As for squeeze, openscenegraph would have to be backported first, so
its not something I
10 matches
Mail list logo
