I just did it on FC 6, but I haven't tried FC 5.
Lee
Nick Othieno wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone successfully compiled flightgear on FC5. I need to do some
development work on COMMS but I can't even get it to run on my FC5
box. The error it gives is something about an ALUT state when it is
still
I just did it on FC 6, but I haven't tried FC 5.
Lee
Nick Othieno wrote:
Hi,
Has anyone successfully compiled flightgear on FC5. I need to do some
development work on COMMS but I can't even get it to run on my FC5
box. The error it gives is something about an ALUT state when it is
still
Nah. I've been putting it off myself. It's always such a painful
excursion into computer hell.
Lee
Nick Othieno wrote:
Thanks,. If all goes bad I'll just upgrade to FC6 or FC7. Do you know
anyone who has tried it on FC7 and got it working.
On Nov 6, 2007 9:17 PM, Lee Duke [EMAIL PROTECTED
This may seem really naive--I'm new to FlightGear, myself--but I found
that performance improved radically when I went to the new graphics
driver software. I'm running FC 6 on an x386 with an NVidia graphics
card. Everything works fine for me. I compiled from source I got out of
the cvs.
Lee
12.7.1941 is a good number to avoid as well.
Curtis Olson wrote:
How about a quick, friendly, positive, informal thread here to do a
poll on what what folks are thinking for the next version number.
I don't intend to slant the discussion, but here is what I'm thinking.
0.9.11 is the next in
Jeez, Bill, 2.718281828459 makes a lot more sense.
Lee
Bill Galbraith wrote:
*From:* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf
Of *Lee Duke
*Sent:* Friday, November 30, 2007 8:14 AM
How about /0.x.y/ where /x/ and /y /can be variables and everyone can
just choose their favorite or preferred numbers rather than filling my
in box with discussions of which number comes after/ z/.
Lee
P.S. The correct answer is /z + 1/.
Richard Bytheway wrote:
It seems to me that we are
If you want to make the simulation more realistic turning up the
turbulence is not the best way to do it. At the NASA Dryden Flight
Research Center, the simulations were operated at 1.4 times real-time to
give the pilot a task that resembled the real thing.
This technique was developed during
put together.
Lee Duke
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
Sorry for the cross post. I know a lot of people will be getting two
copies of this.
I'm looking for information about any of these aircraft: BAC
Strikemaster, the BAE Systems Hawk, or the Pilatus PC-9.
I'm looking for information about aerodynamics, propulsion system,
flight controls, crew
Thanks for the link.
Lee
Ron Jensen wrote:
On Sun, 2007-12-09 at 16:23 -0500, Lee Duke wrote:
Sorry for the cross post. I know a lot of people will be getting two
copies of this.
I'm looking for information about any of these aircraft: BAC
Strikemaster, the BAE Systems Hawk
GW--
Sure, coffeemakers are a good idea. But what about the cement trucks and
bulldozers used to build an airport: should those be included just in
case someone wants to build an airport in their backyard? Perhaps we can
get a large group of people to post links to photos of those backyards
This Air Force reconstruction shows the Nov. 2 crash of an F-15 as it
participated in a simulated dogfight over Missouri.
http://www.latimes.com/la-na-f17-vidblurb,0,7597123.blurb?coll=la-home-center
-
Check out the new
Has anyone tried integrating this radar with standard terrain models
such as those from the DMA? Also, it seems that integrating a
realistic radar simulation feature into FlightGear is valuable even if
it runs a little slow, because having such a model would provide
developers an open source,
What are AI Aircraft models?
Lee
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Stuart Buchanan -- Wednesday 09 April 2008:
As I mentioned in my reply to Vivian, I don't want any dependency
on the Aircraft tree,
You don't want that, fine. And *I* don't want a parallel structure
of aircraft with megabytes
I don't want to take sides in this discussion, I just wanted to share
some information about the Controlled Impact Demonstration (CID)--or as
it was known at Dryden, Crash In the Desert.
The story of what happened depends on who you talk to. I remember that
the FAA was not very happy with the
I think the link I sent to the CID movie was bad. Try this:
http://www1.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Movie/CID/Medium/EM-0004-01.mpg
Here are some photos:
http://www1.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Photo/CID/Large/index.html
--
This
The autopilot would have been the easy part. I offered to do one having
just demonstrated--on the HiMAT vehicle---an autopilot that performed
flight test maneuver automatically. The pilot, Fitz Fulton, refused. He
believed he could fly manually from a remote location.
Curtis Olson wrote:
On
Artem,
You might want to consider using JSBSim instead of FlightGear. I think
you'll find it a lot easier to work with.
Lee
Artem Chernodub wrote:
Hello to everyone!
I'm Ph.D. student from Kiev, Ukraine and I'm studying ways and methods
for developing acontrol systems on the basis of
19 matches
Mail list logo
