Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug#461399: simgear_1.0.0-1 (alpha/unstable): FTBFS: Unrecognized CPU architecture

2008-02-19 Thread Ove Kaaven
Sorry for the late reply... been ill, and then I had much to catch up on afterwards, and so on... almost forgot I needed to answer this. Andy Ross skrev: Ove Kaaven wrote: It's not just him being cranky about his own pet issues, it's about policy and the pursuit of high software standards.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug#461399: simgear_1.0.0-1 (alpha/unstable): FTBFS: Unrecognized CPU architecture

2008-01-19 Thread Andy Ross
Ove Kaaven wrote: It's not just him being cranky about his own pet issues, it's about policy and the pursuit of high software standards. High standards for software you (literally!) can't run? Please. This is pedantry and egotism at its worst. I'm terribly sorry my software isn't good enough

[Flightgear-devel] Bug#461399: simgear_1.0.0-1 (alpha/unstable): FTBFS: Unrecognized CPU architecture

2008-01-18 Thread Ove Kaaven
Hi FlightGear developers. It looks like there are some portability issues in the current code... I got this report on the Debian packages. I could patch the missing ifdefs I guess (though it'd be nice if you fixed them for a future release), but could you comment on the 64-bit issue? Steve

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Bug#461399: simgear_1.0.0-1 (alpha/unstable): FTBFS: Unrecognized CPU architecture

2008-01-18 Thread Andy Ross
Ove Kaaven wrote: It looks like there are some portability issues in the current code... On three platforms which don't have the CPU power (or GPU support!) to actually, y'know, run the software. :) Steve Langasek wrote: So this assumes the kernel will never expose more than 48bits of