Re: [Flightgear-devel] Google Bug Tracker and Aircrafts

2010-02-27 Thread syd adams
Yeah this was discussed earlier because that list rapidly filled up with old bugs . I agree , missing features , or incomplete feature , or not knowing how an instrument works shouldn't be filed as a bug :) On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Heiko Schulz aeitsch...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi, The

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Google Bug Tracker and Aircrafts

2010-02-27 Thread Gijs de Rooy
Heiko Schulz wrote: I wonder if a bug-tracker makes really sense here- we have more than 130 (?) aircrafts 130?! There's 300 of them in CVS, so about 350 with the additional hangars! :) Agree with you on all points btw. It might be nice to have an additional bug tracker for aircraft

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Google Bug Tracker and Aircrafts

2010-02-27 Thread Tim Moore
I don't want to see any feature requests for the code either :) Tim On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 9:54 PM, Heiko Schulz aeitsch...@yahoo.de wrote: Hi, The Google Bug tracker is a nice instrument for the harcore developers here. But I have some problems with bug tracking there on aircrafts. All