RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: 737-300 exposes a possible property/memory bug in real-weather-fetch

2006-04-05 Thread Jon S. Berndt
I'm subsribed to all fgfs/sg cvslogs mailing lists, and update and recompile *at least* once every day, often within minutes after a commit. Except if the commits were mine, which isn't exactly rare either. No, I won't update anything. I'm already running CVS/HEAD, just like always. (Of

[Flightgear-devel] Re: 737-300 exposes a possible property/memory bug in real-weather-fetch

2006-04-05 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Jon S. Berndt -- Wednesday 05 April 2006 15:21: What kind of climb rate do you see? How long does it take to get to those really high altitudes? Oh, it takes very long. More than an hour. That's why I'm not keen to try it without AP. I prefer to let the AP do that on another desktop, only

[Flightgear-devel] Re: 737-300 exposes a possible property/memory bug in real-weather-fetch

2006-04-05 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Jon S. Berndt -- Wednesday 05 April 2006 15:21: Now the question is, how up-to-date is your code? ;-) About an hour ago. plib/simgear/flightgear/base. Hehe ... OK. I just remember that you come occasionally with compilation problems that are caused by code changes done several weeks ago.

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: 737-300 exposes a possible property/memory bug in real-weather-fetch

2006-04-05 Thread Jon S. Berndt
* Jon S. Berndt -- Wednesday 05 April 2006 15:21: Now the question is, how up-to-date is your code? ;-) About an hour ago. plib/simgear/flightgear/base. Hehe ... OK. I just remember that you come occasionally with compilation problems that are caused by code changes done several weeks